Hmmm... I might just have to go out and buy this game
| Quake3World.com https://www.quake3world.com/forum/ |
|
| Why Quake 4 rocks so hard https://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=11824 |
Page 2 of 7 |
| Author: | Duhard [ 10-16-2005 11:29 PM ] |
| Post subject: | |
SHUT THE FUCK UP O'DIUM |
|
| Author: | mjrpes [ 10-17-2005 01:34 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hmmm... I might just have to go out and buy this game
|
|
| Author: | DooMer [ 10-17-2005 02:06 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Indeed, mrherpes. Indeed. |
|
| Author: | rebb [ 10-17-2005 02:08 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ok Zombie, admit it, how many clerks did you stab to get this so early ? 
|
|
| Author: | phantasmagoria [ 10-17-2005 02:26 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
| I'm jealous
|
|
| Author: | MKJ [ 10-17-2005 03:53 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
hey, the edge remake looks like :gasp: the edge! 
|
|
| Author: | chris [ 10-17-2005 04:25 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Duhard wrote: I have a feeling that "blood rose" map is gonna own..
dude, im in agreement, it looks fucking mint and thats just from a screenshot! callvote blood rose duals on its release!! |
|
| Author: | R00k [ 10-17-2005 04:42 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dear god. I might have to run by EB Games here before work and see if they're selling copies. Thanks for posting Zombie, you're my new hero. 
|
|
| Author: | alright [ 10-17-2005 05:02 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
How does it feel, physics wise? Is it similar to VQ3 or CPMA... or maybe a combination of both? Really curious about the movement |
|
| Author: | R00k [ 10-17-2005 05:06 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yea, and we're still waiting on your system specs, and how playable the game is on them.
|
|
| Author: | busetibi [ 10-17-2005 05:20 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
There's a shitload of screenshots (MP and SP) here -> http://www.dailyrush.dk/features/galler ... arts/3349/ edit: takes a while for it to load |
|
| Author: | chris [ 10-17-2005 05:20 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
I can't remember if it was this forum or another but someone else was quoted playing it on a 2.2 P4 and a 6800 and said they were getting a playable 40fps |
|
| Author: | Pext [ 10-17-2005 05:31 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
whoah... those MP maps look like sex in a can! can't wait to get my hands on this game ( and an internet connection at home i just moved this weekend... )
|
|
| Author: | Oeloe [ 10-17-2005 06:09 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
How about the copy protection? Is it really some starforce proggy you have to install? And do the physics really feel 1:1 with Quake 3, like Tim Willits said (mathematically the same). 60 FPS max, that sux though. |
|
| Author: | Eraser [ 10-17-2005 06:17 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oeloe wrote: 60 FPS max, that sux though.
No it doesn't. Everybody thinks high FPS are a necessity. They aren't. 125 fps was only important in Q3 because of the physcis. You won't notice it in Quake 4. Also, it's only it's internal speed. Your videocard will still render maybe 120fps (if it's technically capable of that) but it'll be rendering the exact same scene twice 
|
|
| Author: | Fjoggs [ 10-17-2005 06:19 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'll be happy If I can achieve 20fps. |
|
| Author: | iMoose [ 10-17-2005 06:20 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Its weird thats there are no bots as they obviously had to create some kind of AI for singleplayer (same with Doom3); I don't know how all that works but couldn't they have just have added it to the multiplayer? It doesn't matter though. Looking at those screenshots, I know Quake 4 will rule.
|
|
| Author: | Fjoggs [ 10-17-2005 06:28 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
SP AI and MP AI is completely different. |
|
| Author: | DrWho [ 10-17-2005 06:29 AM ] |
| Post subject: | Q4 server set up |
could you post info on q4 server set up and rcon commands please? |
|
| Author: | Don Carlos [ 10-17-2005 06:35 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sandstorm looks like a map for winners |
|
| Author: | -mess- [ 10-17-2005 06:46 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
is there anything like "timedemo" or smth? could you benchmark game with: 1024/full (dunno about fsaa and anizo, or soft shadows) and 800x600 + low? and give us more shots of mp maps pls 
|
|
| Author: | chris [ 10-17-2005 06:50 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oeloe wrote: How about the copy protection? Is it really some starforce proggy you have to install? And do the physics really feel 1:1 with Quake 3, like Tim Willits said (mathematically the same). 60 FPS max, that sux though.
Buy it you fag! We're not talking some shit box film or something you downloaded off the internet, we're talking ID's much loved and anticipated sequel, QUAKE 4. |
|
| Author: | Zyte [ 10-17-2005 06:53 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
nice screens. very nice. |
|
| Author: | Don Carlos [ 10-17-2005 06:58 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
-mess- wrote: is there anything like "timedemo" or smth?
could you benchmark game with: 1024/full (dunno about fsaa and anizo, or soft shadows) and 800x600 + low? and give us more shots of mp maps pls Best idea of the thread!!! |
|
| Author: | chris [ 10-17-2005 07:00 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Don Carlos wrote: -mess- wrote: is there anything like "timedemo" or smth? could you benchmark game with: 1024/full (dunno about fsaa and anizo, or soft shadows) and 800x600 + low? and give us more shots of mp maps pls Best idea of the thread!!! Yeh definitly, i want to see some results!!! Wanna see how hard my pc rocks against q4
|
|
| Author: | -mess- [ 10-17-2005 07:05 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
just make sure to tell us graphic settings 
|
|
| Author: | rgoer [ 10-17-2005 07:10 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
There is some MP footage (well, not so much "proper" mp footage as it is "one dude running around a couple of maps recording a demo"--but they are maps we haven't shown to the public before, so it's something new to see) available here: http://forum.ingame.de/quake/showthread.php?s=&threadid=187229 Links to vids: http://bad.qgl.org/video/eoc.bad_q4ctf.avi http://bad.qgl.org/video/eoc.bad_q2dm1_run.avi If anybody can mirror these, it would be appreciated--I'm sure the intarweb will find out about these and this guy's server will melt by lunchtime. |
|
| Author: | glossy [ 10-17-2005 07:38 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
rgoer wrote: Links to vids:
http://bad.qgl.org/video/eoc.bad_q4ctf.avi http://bad.qgl.org/video/eoc.bad_q2dm1_run.avi If anybody can mirror these, it would be appreciated--I'm sure the intarweb will find out about these and this guy's server will melt by lunchtime. I have them downloaded, if you need a mirror drop my a PM and i'll upload them
|
|
| Author: | MKJ [ 10-17-2005 07:40 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fjoggs wrote: SP AI and MP AI is completely different.
they couldve used pretty much the same AI as q3 does though :o |
|
| Author: | Iccy (temp) [ 10-17-2005 07:45 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
can someone edit that cfg post, its fucking up the whole thread. |
|
| Author: | DooMer [ 10-17-2005 07:53 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
The physics are like vq3, but with the addition of ramp jumping, it feels a little bit more floaty. |
|
| Author: | Iccy (temp) [ 10-17-2005 07:55 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well i just watched the videos and only one thing comes to me. My baby is back
*edit* thnx for fixing that post doomer |
|
| Author: | Duhard [ 10-17-2005 08:01 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Here's a scan of a q4 review in a german magazine.. http://img224.imageshack.us/my.php?image=q400180gm.jpg ..ownership. |
|
| Author: | Fjoggs [ 10-17-2005 08:08 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
I want this game so bad. |
|
| Author: | shiznit [ 10-17-2005 08:09 AM ] |
| Post subject: | |
Looks great. More screenshots pls.
|
|
| Page 2 of 7 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
