OnLive

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by tnf »

thx for that link. Signed up, who knows?
Even if it was laggy, it'd be cool to beta something that potentially groundbreaking.
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5986
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Κracus »

Yeah I wish I could apply but Canadians are not cool enough :(
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Transient »

Applied. If I get in, I'll see if Linux users in the boonies have any luck with it. :smirk:
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by bitWISE »

I signed up under Leopard. Hopefully fewer people choose that and thus my odds are better.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: OnLive

Post by scared? »

lol another no0b concept soon to fail...
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5986
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Κracus »

Well that's what people say but apparently the developers of the technology disagree.

http://kotaku.com/5194510/onlive-founde ... -will-work
Steve Perlman, one of the founders of the OnLive streaming video game service unveiled at last week's GDC, has defended the innovations powering the PC gaming service, dismissing articles calling the technology "unworkable" as "ignorant."

While Perlman used that term specifically in regard to a Eurogamer editorial—"Why OnLive Can't Possibly Work"—the outlet isn't the only one questioning whether OnLive can deliver high-definition, perceptually real-time video game experiences without a console or PC. He tells the BBC that critics have not yet used the system, nor do they understand the technology behind it.

"We have nine of the largest game publishers in world signed up," Perlman said. "They have spent several years in some cases actually going and reviewing our technology before allowing us to associate with their company names and allowing us to have access to their first-tier franchises."
[/quote]
User avatar
DooMer
Posts: 3068
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by DooMer »

They can say whatever they want. Even if they do overcome the bandwidth issue, What about ping? When I hop on a game server, I can tell the difference between 30 ping and LAN. How can an algorithm lower your ping? Out of the many years of online gaming, the evolution of netcode, a company out of nowhere is going to wave a magic wand and make the ping issue go away?

What kind of hardware is it going to take to run this shit, and encode the video? What about the latency when encoding live video, especially in an HD format? Also to handle the number of people connecting and trying to play this shit?

Maybe it will work, but it sounds like bullshit to me.
axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by axbaby »

if you can afford the fast reliable internet connection with no download cap then you can afford a decent video card and cpu.
4/5 of the world with substandard internet need not apply for this scamware
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
User avatar
Whiskey 7
Posts: 9712
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2001 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Whiskey 7 »

DooMer wrote:They can say whatever they want. Even if they do overcome the bandwidth issue, What about ping? When I hop on a game server, I can tell the difference between 30 ping and LAN. How can an algorithm lower your ping? Out of the many years of online gaming, the evolution of netcode, a company out of nowhere is going to wave a magic wand and make the ping issue go away?

What kind of hardware is it going to take to run this shit, and encode the video? What about the latency when encoding live video, especially in an HD format? Also to handle the number of people connecting and trying to play this shit?

Maybe it will work, but it sounds like bullshit to me.
Read all the above and seen the promo vid. Does sound promising though (in a few years perhaps).

Figure you're right at the moment DooMer :up:
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by brisk »

guys, i just got back from onlive hq as i was chosen as a beta tester. i can confirm it DOES work and i will break my NDA and reveal the secret behind it all: cl_timenudge -80

it's the future i'm tellin' ya.
[quote="GONNAFISTYA"]You might as well have complained about the Mona Lisa right after Michelangelo painted the first two strokes of his brush.[/quote]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17515
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Don Carlos »

Image
User avatar
shaft
Posts: 12473
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by shaft »

User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by plained »

i think it can be done

but the quality will suffer from the things mentioned like screen demensions and image compresion and of cource the lag

still tho with those drawbacks i would think there will be a massive demand 4 it cuz of all the bored@work peeps that want to own some noobs

there are so many great familer games and so many gamers
it is about time!
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Doombrain »

axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by axbaby »

Doombrain wrote:http://kotaku.com/5195486/crytek-the-internet-isnt-ready-for-streaming-game-services
thanks for the link you stupid cunt :olo:
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Doombrain »

jesus, you're stupid.
axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by axbaby »

shut the fuck up tonerboi
you didn't even notice the same link two posts up by shaft you stupid cunt. :olo:
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Doombrain »

Or did I repost it to show pained how worthless his opinion is?

:tard:
axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by axbaby »

who made you the stupid police , get back and troll in the spam your forum you stupid cunt
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Doombrain »

axbaby wrote:who made you the stupid police , get back and troll in the spam your forum you stupid cunt
You're under arrest on counts of severe stupidity.
axbaby
Posts: 3424
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 1999 8:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by axbaby »

troll attempt fail #56 :olo:
wrong forum tonerboi
[color=#FF0000][WYD][/color]
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by Doombrain »

You’re losing this, just stop.
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by plained »

fuck i'm awesome!
it is about time!
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: OnLive

Post by brisk »

It has just launched in the UK and I had a go on it. Horrible, laggy mess and visually, the quality is shite. The input lag IS noticable and makes FPS style games impossible. Worse yet, the moment I signed up, I was greeted to network errors every few seconds (my internet is with the fastest, most stable ISP in the UK), which pauses gameplay until it re-buffers.

The one thing I really do like is being able to snoop into other players games and see them in action. Obviously they're having just as much a horrible time as I am, but you can at least see a game in action before buying it. Just not on Onlive, obviously lul.

Anyway i'm sure the network dropouts are due to the high demand at the moment and theres a 30 minute free trial on most games. Oh and you can buy DX:HR for a quid if you want, amongst some other decent titles. Definite potential, but in it's current state, completely unusable for me.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: OnLive

Post by scared? »

lol
Post Reply