i assume the rs4 is *0HC, whilst the old pushrods are actually lighter engines. for one.

yeah maybe c4s and up, but the c3s looked class.

this is the part where i chime in and say audi's are ugly too.

old news.
btw the alabama legal code is incredibly broken.

Nightshade wrote:

Hey, when's ToxicDud going to bust out some examples of awesome Canadian performance cars?

they have those in canada?

look at the torque/hp peaks -
5500 for torque, 7800 for hp? please, means you have to rev the shit outta it.
yeah being able to rev it up to 8000+ rpm is nice and all, but having the power at say 2000, much nicer.

The peak torque of that 1.8L is 178lb-ft, therefore the 4.6L would have to make 455lb-ft of peak torque. Considering that it would rev to like 8500rpm, that is more than enough torque. what are you on about? do you even understand the concept of peak torque? edit: regardless of that, the pwoer of a...

could i have the password for pantsman2k sent to lee028@bama.ua.edu
and the postcount from altnic merged if that account even exists anymore

If a 4.6L V8 Mustang GT had the same HP/L like that civic (300hp/1.8L) then it would have 767HP N/A :olo: of course, it will never be calculated that way the torque numbers are even if not more than what the horsypower is at...that is where the extra size makes the difference The peak torque of tha...