Is it a conspiracy if conservative funded operatives try to infiltrate the WaPo in an attempt to discredit but only prove they’re professional journalists who thoroughly vet sources? :olo: who did they conspire with? you dont seem to even understand the meaning of the word :olo: .. why are you stil...

Undercover sting operation by Project Veritas against WaPo discovered. This whole story is gold. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investig ... story.html Now compare that story to this beautiful piece of journalism from last week. [tweet]https://twitter.com/briansflood/status/934075011584942081[/twee...

why do you dodge 3 simple questions.. afraid or unable to defend your views?

wrong email

when all else fails, resort to whataboutism Slowly making their way from Trumps lies about TIME to “but her emails”. you gave the sarcastic remark about a conspiracy, thats why we are expanding the topic. are you afraid or unable to defend your vies? or why do you dodge? obviously you want to play....

how come hillarys camp had the right poll numbers internally? they point this out in their conversations that the media polls are all off in hillarys favor... i already linked you to these emails when it first came out. thats another fact you cant dispute but you keep on theorizing...

hillary still lost, despite the conspiracy

transient seems to agree there was a conspiracy...


can you anwser the same 3 quesitons eraser?

lets see what results you get...

is sending debate questions secretly to one candidate even a legal thing? if they all did it to advance one candidate is that a conspiracy?

are you gonna deny that hillary got the debate questions beforehand?

did any of you have any arguments at all? no.. except for red font guy trying in his ordinary way of reading headlines and make the rest up way.. why the polls were so off remains unanswered, chunk only pointed out the last week.... i dont see any headlines calling for a complete revision of polling...

answer the questions above

ok shaft answer me this...

is sending debate questions secretly to one candidate even a legal thing? if they all did it to advance one candidate is that a conspiracy?

are you gonna deny that hillary got the debate questions beforehand?

please in straight fashion you can y/n if you want.

honestly tho shaft, how much $ did you really contribute to the hillary campaign?

shaft wrote:Yeah, that's why Hilary won. You figured out the master plan. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

Now lets get to the bottom of those 6 million illegal votes.

i thought you said its not worth arguing... you came back now that youre not on the spot anymore to present some arguments

polls started to get accurate in the last days thats not a surprise. and its not the other way around that suddenly everyone switched to trump like you want to portray it. i mean every fucking msm site was asking this question after election; how could the polls be so wrong? but you still say they w...

such polls are usually very accurate. To get accurate statistics 1000 people are a big enough sample coupled by oversampling to adjust for anomalies that can happen in a small sample pool. Oversampling is used to get more accurate results and also can be used to " maximize what we get out of ou...

1) Undecided poll-takers favored Drumpf once it came time to cast their ballot 2) People who take the time to answer poll questions tend to be more educated, and Clinton supporters are more educated on average 3) A lot of Drumpf supporters were too embarrassed to answer truthfully on the polls and ...

polls were way off, whats the reason for that? "polls can be inaccurate" cannot be a reason in such widespread and extreme misrepresentation. polls are very accurate and inaccurate if you want them to be.

so whats the reason for very inaccurate polls in all msm pre election?

you made how many posts on this topic? but now that you need to deliver an argument its not worth arguing?


i ask you all again, what is the reason for very obvious inaccurate reporting of the pre election scene other than deliberate deceiving?

shaft wrote:lol @ dubz tripping over himself trying to find a MSM conspiracy

how do you explain the very innacurate polls before the election? trump had 1% chance of winning right till the last day?

Last years photoshoot was done when trump already knew he would be person of the year. nov 28


if you think trump would go out of his way and lie about such a thing and believe a known liar like time on the other hand... youre all gone into kracus level delusions

shaft wrote:

dubz wrote:notice the date of the photoshoot

What does that have to do with his claim?

the photoshooting for 2016 person of the year happened nov. 28. Thats their own article saying that, but now they say they never reveal anything before publication on dec.6

notice the date of the photoshoot

you get lied to every day by the same people, and you know it.. but you still want to believe

http://time.com/4591211/time-person-of- ... the-cover/

a great firewall of western world is already developing. Facebook, Google, Twitter.. they all admitted before congress just recently to secretly censoring content. now to legitimize these actions they have put in place an ad hoc fact checker who is incidentally again a soros group.. they call this n...

shouldnt lifting regulations lead to neutrality? like blockchain technology is decentralizing? if corporations have control and not the government, isnt that decentralized in a capitalist world? so we have 2 problems that are named the same and both sides fighting for neutrality. but dont you think ...