tbqh i'm pretty much over generative AI. every image looks instantly fake and the only pleasure i get from looking at them is spotting the additional limbs/fingers, the weird skin flaps, and the oval irises

knowing that what i'm looking is basically hi-tech plagiarism doesn't help either

... and satisfactory path to take than dicking around with prompts to get a piece of software to sort of do what you want it to do. I use an AI image generator to give me illustrations to use as visual aides when I play D&D. It's useful for players to show everyone what their characters ...

... picture is often tweaked manually in Photoshop or something similar (like tweaking exposures, fixing some bugs/artifacts in the generated image, etc.), so it's a job basically. Sooo..... what's actually won then? Instead of spending countless hours typing in prompts and having to do manual ...

... picture is often tweaked manually in Photoshop or something similar (like tweaking exposures, fixing some bugs/artifacts in the generated image, etc.), so it's a job basically.

... and bad in the sense that it's gonna be easily abused for malicious intents, more than ever. AI is better and better at generating convincing imagery, and we need better and better tools to combat those. But as a tool for artists? It's great! I've had this opinion towards AI art that it's ...