Quake3World.com Forums
     General Discussion
        building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...


Post new topicReply to topic
Login | Profile | | FAQ | Search | IRC




Previous topic | Next topic 
Topic Starter Topic: building fire in madrid proves 911 hoax...

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-12-2005 10:52 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


official cause of collapse of wtc 1, 2 and 7 has always been fire...

so why the fuck did this building in madrid which is made junk parts, not collapse in on its own footprint like wtc buildings? maybe because its impossible without explosives...which this fired just proved...




Top
                 

.
.
Joined: 15 Dec 2000
Posts: 10168
PostPosted: 02-12-2005 10:52 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


of course




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-12-2005 10:59 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


thx...




Top
                 

OUR HERO
OUR HERO
Joined: 23 May 1973
Posts: 3273
PostPosted: 02-12-2005 11:28 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Freakaloin wrote:
official cause of collapse of wtc 1, 2 and 7 has always been fire...

so why the fuck did this building in madrid which is made junk parts, not collapse in on its own footprint like wtc buildings? maybe because its impossible without explosives...which this fired just proved...


"Prove" is a pretty strong word.




Top
                 

Your Other Daddy
Your Other Daddy
Joined: 03 Dec 1999
Posts: 20012
PostPosted: 02-12-2005 11:30 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


god thats old, get with the times ffs

and it was the jews



_________________
[WYD]SoM


Top
                 

rep
rep
Joined: 29 Aug 2002
Posts: 6771
PostPosted: 02-12-2005 11:44 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


SoM wrote:
god thats old, get with the times ffs

and it was the jews


HAHA! A mossad 'expert' everyone! Check it out.



_________________
Image


Top
                 

Your Other Daddy
Your Other Daddy
Joined: 03 Dec 1999
Posts: 20012
PostPosted: 02-12-2005 11:47 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


terrorist



_________________
[WYD]SoM


Top
                 

Unquantifiable Abstract
Unquantifiable Abstract
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 52133
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 01:56 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


to be fair the buildings causing as little damage as they did for the size of themis quite strange. I mean you lok at the way the buliding fell in on itself. Why didnt the wind blow the building left or right?

Its very stange considering...



_________________
Where were you when the West was defeated?
Image


Top
                 

oldskool
oldskool
Joined: 06 Mar 2000
Posts: 40788
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 05:10 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


nice fire

Image




Top
                 

Tap, Nap, or Snap
Tap, Nap, or Snap
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 27667
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 06:14 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Jesus, when is this stupidity going to end?

edit: WHEN WILL THE TYPOS END?



_________________
Nightshade[no u]


Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 06:58 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


wtc 1 2 and 7 were demoed...anyone who isn't a moron knows it...




Top
                 

Bück Dich
Bück Dich
Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Posts: 6228
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 07:08 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


who gives a shit?




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 07:28 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


ur dad took a shit when i was fucking him...silly fagot...




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:06 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


lol...this fire was 1000 times worse then the fires at wtc buildings...at itr didn't fal...and it wasn't even made of steel...rofl...

Image




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:10 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


did it have a jumbo jet and a hole in the side of the buidling ?



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Bbbllrrrrzzppp!!
Bbbllrrrrzzppp!!
Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 240
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:14 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


losCHUNK wrote:
did it have a jumbo jet and a hole in the side of the buidling ?


Owned...

Surley though, having a jumbo jet crash into the side would have weakened the structure of the building...



_________________
Would you like some OJ?


Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:17 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


what i was thinking, qa hole in the side of the building caused by a jumbo jet and its fuel

and if you looked the way it collapsed the top fell above the hole, so what couldve happened is that the plane took out supports holding the floors above up then the fire destroyed the remaining supports

then the entire top half collapsed onto the bottom causing it to fall like a stack of cards....

if you wanna believe its a hoax then fair enough but that dont prove shit



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:18 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


wtc 7 wasn't hit by a jet...only a few floors burned...

if u know anything about wtc 1 and 2 construction, u would know the planes could never cause those buildings to be weakened enuff to fall. the exoskeleton was string and was damaged by the planes, but the core of the buildings were intact...and all 3 of the wtc building were made above any standards...and they were STEEL...not concrete...

and by the way dumbo...no one thinks the planes smashing into the buildings had anything to do with the collapse...they buildings were designed to withstand planes crashing into them. the buildings swayed more during storms then they did when they were it by the planes...the fires are the offical reason for the collapse...even though no steel framed skyscaper has collpased from fired until 911...when 3 did...all 3 with minor fires that didn't even get hot enough to melt steel...

don't be a moron...




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:19 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


o fuck off the fact is you dont know how much damage was caused when the plane hit

wanna know why, because it all ended up as rubble



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:20 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


wow...it amazing how brainwashed u morons are...do u even know how wtc 1 and 2 were constructed? guess not...and what about wtc7? it was hardly damaged...anyways the owner of the building slipped in an interview and admitted(on camera) the building was "pulled"...




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:21 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


clit

also the core wass intact ?

in one of the vids you can see flames sprout out the other side of the building when the plane hit, how the fuck can it be intact if that happens



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Last edited by losCHUNK on 02-13-2005 09:21 AM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:21 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Quote:
wanna know why, because it all ended up as rubble


yeah and the rubble was taken and destroyed as fast as possible in sigapore...which is a crime in itself...




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:22 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


cuz the core is in the middle...where the planes never hit...dumbass..




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:22 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Freakaloin wrote:
wow...it amazing how brainwashed u morons are...do u even know how wtc 1 and 2 were constructed? guess not...and what about wtc7? it was hardly damaged...anyways the owner of the building slipped in an interview and admitted(on camera) the building was "pulled"...


how ?

well im guessing they started from the bottom and worked theyre way up



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Last edited by losCHUNK on 02-13-2005 09:24 AM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
                 

Bbbllrrrrzzppp!!
Bbbllrrrrzzppp!!
Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 240
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:22 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


A small plane flying into the tower, yeah, wouldnt do much damage...

But a jumbo fully laden with fuel flown DIRECTLY at the tower, then thats a different story...


EDIT: Damnit, stop posting so quickly, keep missing things out :icon32:



_________________
Would you like some OJ?


Last edited by boo on 02-13-2005 09:24 AM, edited 1 time in total.

Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:23 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Freakaloin wrote:
cuz the core is in the middle...where the planes never hit...dumbass..


yes but you see flames come out the other side of the building

damage is caused

unless fire took a detour around the core and come out the otherside



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:26 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


the building were designed to take the impact of jumbo jets..

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html

the core is in the middle...the planes went thru side of the buildings that are connected...not one side...thru the core and out the other...




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:27 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


most engineers and architects outside of the us don't believe the official us version of the collpases...i wonder why?




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:28 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


you said the core wasnt damaged when i said it was because you could see it go clear through the building

i didnt say about how far the planes penetrated the building

as for the designing

i thought the titanic was designed not to sink ?



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:31 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


hey dumbo...NOONE who is in a position to know thinks the planes hitting the buildings caused the collapses...it was the jet fuel they claim that brought the buildings down...

i'll say it again since u want to think something that no one in the world with a brain believes...

the buildings were designed to withstand the impact of jumbojets...

no steel skyscraper has ever collapsed from fire before 911...and there have been bigger fires before..

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysi ... fires.html

why so ready to beleieve george bush and company?




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:33 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


losCHUNK wrote:

as for the designing

i thought the titanic was designed not to sink ?


no man that was just hype...ships made like the titanic today(with that kind of flympsy steel...even for that time) would not even pass inspection...


and the core was intact or the building would have fallen immediately...and no one eccept u is disputing if they were still intact...




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:35 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


and i said the planes mustve weakened the structure, you seen the fucking hole

the fire probaly brought it down

and like i said, when the supports gave way holding the top half up the building had no option but to give in

im probaly wrong but the fact is no one can calculate the damage caused when the building was nothing but a pile of steel by the time the day ended



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:36 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Freakaloin wrote:
losCHUNK wrote:

as for the designing

i thought the titanic was designed not to sink ?


no man that was just hype...ships made like the titanic today(with that kind of flympsy steel...even for that time) would not even pass inspection...


and the core was intact or the building would have fallen immediately...and no one eccept u is disputing if they were still intact...


yer and im sure in 70 yrs time building like ours wont even pass inspection and the WTC the un planeable building was just hype and myth



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:37 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Freakaloin wrote:

why so ready to beleieve george bush and company?


i aint, im just not ready to believe that the building is proof that the WTC's shoudlve held, TBH i couldnt give a fuck if the building was pulled or not



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10443
PostPosted: 02-13-2005 09:46 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


yeah dude...ppl can calculate and have calculated damage...they could have done alot more, but for some reason the govt had all the rubble destroyed before investigators were allowed to check it...which is against the law btw...

u obviously don't know how those towers were designed...




Top
                 
Quake3World.com | Forum Index | General Discussion


Post new topic Reply to topic


cron
Quake3World.com
© ZeniMax. Zenimax, QUAKE III ARENA, Id Software and associated trademarks are trademarks of the ZeniMax group of companies. All rights reserved.
This is an unofficial fan website without any affiliation with or endorsement by ZeniMax.
All views and opinions expressed are those of the author.