Quake3World.com Forums
     General Discussion
        Long live the Queen!


Post new topicReply to topic
Login | Profile | | FAQ | Search | IRC




Previous topic | Next topic 
Topic Starter Topic: Re: Long live the Queen!

Just another Earthling
Just another Earthling
Joined: 20 Jul 2001
Posts: 12932
PostPosted: 05-03-2017 09:51 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Watching but no news here....



_________________
Physicist of Q3W


Top
                 

Unquantifiable Abstract
Unquantifiable Abstract
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 52133
PostPosted: 05-03-2017 11:27 PM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I hope Liz and Phil are alright :(




Top
                 

Legend
Legend
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 16499
PostPosted: 05-03-2017 11:34 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I'm amazed how Brits are ok with donating their taxes to keeping the frumpy queen and her inbred cousins living in luxury while every public sector of their country is collapsing.

And they still even like the old cunts.




Top
                 

Unquantifiable Abstract
Unquantifiable Abstract
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 52133
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 12:02 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


They are mega- you've got no idea how important they are to the British in terms of tourism and international prestige.

On the grand scale of things they cost us nothing. I'll be gutted when something happens to them :(




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 12:17 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Aye the income from their estates alone pay what's given back by a pretty big ratio

Meanwhile Google doesn't pay tax



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Cool #9
Cool #9
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 44138
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 12:41 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Same thing with Dutch royalty. There's people who feverishly oppose the idea of the crown but in the end, they earn us more than they cost.

They open (business) doors that would otherwise remain closed. For example, our king & queen went to China for a state visit. In China, they are seen as the highest representatives of our country and so they consider it a huge honor that the king and queen would visit their country. This softened them up for favorable business deals.




Top
                 

Unquantifiable Abstract
Unquantifiable Abstract
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 52133
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 01:56 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


:up:




Top
                 

Cool #9
Cool #9
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 44138
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 03:40 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


So yeah, turns out this is just about Prince Philip stepping down from his royal duties :shrug:




Top
                 

Etile
Etile
Joined: 19 Nov 2003
Posts: 34899
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 08:45 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


a 95 year old man retired today

it was poignant :|




Top
                 

Risen From The Ashes
Risen From The Ashes
Joined: 03 Aug 2000
Posts: 26774
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 09:21 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Captain Mazda wrote:
I'm amazed how Brits are ok with donating their taxes to keeping the frumpy queen and her inbred cousins living in luxury while every public sector of their country is collapsing.

And they still even like the old cunts.


Quote:
Buckingham Palace said the Royal family now costs 62p for every citizen of the United Kingdom, up from 58p last year. A spokesman also said two thirds of the increase in the Queen’s income was being spent on reducing a huge backlog of repairs to royal palaces.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06 ... p-per-per/

That's pretty good value to be fair




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 09:46 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Pretty much. They're just a bunch of people who inherited a small fortune, only they give back far more than they earn. Winn0r.



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 

Legend
Legend
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Posts: 16499
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 10:05 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Quote:
Returning to that official "56p per person", it's worth noting that it is based on total population, rather than those paying tax. Using that figure of 29.7 million,
it actually works out at £1.26 per taxpayer. Anti-monarchy group Republic have also raised the issue of costs that are unaccounted for in the official figure. Royal security, for example, costs £100m.

The Independent has worked out that the total bill is eight times the official number, amounting to a real fee of £11.24 per taxpayer.
This purpose of this annual topping up can, of course, be called into question when you consider the royal family's personal wealth already.
That figure does comes in at a surprisingly low £340 million, meaning Britain's queen is no millionaire. Indeed, the British royal family is not even the wealthiest in Europe.
Monaco's royals have a fortune of £650m, while Lichtenstein top the table with a whopping £4.9bn fortune, according to Forbes and the Sunday Times Rich List.
Which seems like rather a lot until you realise that the King of Thailand is worth a cool £20.8bn.

Is Elizabeth II earning her keep then? Royalists make that case, citing the massive tourism boost the likes of the Diamond Jubilee and the most recent royal wedding bring to English shores.
In 2015, Brand Value put the net value of the monarchy at £1.155 billion for the year. The methodology was all a little vague, however, with the "Kate Effect" ("an uplift to fashion and other brands worn, used or otherwise endorsed")
put at £152 million, the "Charlotte Effect" accounting for £101 million and the "George Effect" apparently earning £76 million. Oh, and £114 million was the "estimated value of PR".
Patricia Yates, VisitBritain's director of strategy and communications, told the Independent: "While having a royal family gets us an enormous amount of global coverage and free advertising
for Britain across the world - which is invaluable - it’s not something we can give give an exact economic figure for". Republic has put forward research showing the monarchy costs Britain £334 million a year.

Fittingly for the British royals, there's a lot of smoke and mirrors around these claims. What we do know is that it's an issue that stretches right across the Atlantic.
According to this study, every Canadian shelled out $1.63 in the year from 2011 to 2012 for the privilege of keeping QEII on their money.

And they don't even get the beautiful, historic palaces and castles to wander past.


http://www.newstalk.com/How-much-does-t ... st-Britain




Top
                 

Truffle Shuffle
Truffle Shuffle
Joined: 08 May 2002
Posts: 17167
PostPosted: 05-04-2017 10:36 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Well, whatever she gets, we get the other 85% :)



_________________
. : You knows you knows


Top
                 
Quake3World.com | Forum Index | General Discussion


Post new topic Reply to topic


cron
Quake3World.com
© ZeniMax. Zenimax, QUAKE III ARENA, Id Software and associated trademarks are trademarks of the ZeniMax group of companies. All rights reserved.
This is an unofficial fan website without any affiliation with or endorsement by ZeniMax.
All views and opinions expressed are those of the author.