Monty Python is quality.Whiskey 7 wrote:Last night I watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975)
You've no doubt seen this classicand I enjoyed as I hadn't seen it for decades.
IMDB
I liked The Disaster Artist, would recommend.
Monty Python is quality.Whiskey 7 wrote:Last night I watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975)
You've no doubt seen this classicand I enjoyed as I hadn't seen it for decades.
IMDB
And a trailer for you...The official synopses reads:
Set in Iraq in 2003, Sand Castle follows a group of American soldiers in the early days of the second Gulf War. Bearing witness to the heat and the horror is the inexperienced Private Matt Ocre (Nicholas Hoult), who together with several fellow soldiers is ordered to the outskirts of Baqubah to repair a water pumping station damaged by U.S. bombs. But as Ocre discovers, in an atmosphere where resentment and anger fester, trying to win the hearts and minds of the locals is a task fraught with danger. It’s here, in the streets, squares and schools that he discovers the true cost of war.
I want to watch The Room, but apparently you can’t stream it anywhere...MKJ wrote:Yea I wanted to see Disaster Artist from the moment it was announced.
I've got to add I enjoyed it on release, so much so I bought the Blu-ray. On reading these recent comments, I went looking to see if I bought the DVD and there it was in the collection, still wrapped in cellophane. Guess I better watch again. Checked and I gave it a 10 out of 10 in this topic back in May 2017Don Carlos wrote:Oh it had some major shit in there and also had a lot of missed opportunities from what I could see, but there were some good parts to it.
Basically, the problem is that it gets stuck in the middle. There's no suspense or horror, just tacked on Alien sequences with an under developed Android story. I mean, really, who gives a flying fuck where the Aliens came from ?, and how much time was devoted to explaining it ?, only to have it forced into the narrative with a crowbar and hammer.shaft wrote:Why can’t it be about both? Can’t keep telling the same story over and over. I didn’t mind the twist.
I am with you Don CarlosDon Carlos wrote:I do! They are not an advanced organism so they had no way of creating and flying a ship...so how did they come to be in the middle of space on a random planet?
I like the fact they are trying to explain where they came from, especially given it goes some way to explaining how there came to be eggs on the ship with the Space Jockey in Alien, is a good thing in my opinion. It makes perfect sense as prequels go.
Sounds like a good filmWhiskey 7 wrote:I am with you Don CarlosDon Carlos wrote:I do! They are not an advanced organism so they had no way of creating and flying a ship...so how did they come to be in the middle of space on a random planet?
I like the fact they are trying to explain where they came from, especially given it goes some way to explaining how there came to be eggs on the ship with the Space Jockey in Alien, is a good thing in my opinion. It makes perfect sense as prequels go.
that after credit sceneMKJ wrote:Yea I wanted to see Disaster Artist from the moment it was announced.
So where did the fucking eggs come from in Covenant? did David squeeze them from his ass? I HATE that Ridley is trying to explain the xenomorphs. I'm almost as upset as Doombrain is about Star Wars about this. I wish they'd just leave it alone. Part of the menace of the xenos was their mystery, imagination is a powerful tool in the medium of storytelling. Covenant and Prometheus sully that.Don Carlos wrote:I do! They are not an advanced organism so they had no way of creating and flying a ship...so how did they come to be in the middle of space on a random planet?
I like the fact they are trying to explain where they came from, especially given it goes some way to explaining how there came to be eggs on the ship with the Space Jockey in Alien, is a good thing in my opinion. It makes perfect sense as prequels go.