The last movie you saw
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:43 pm
I just got back from Batman Begins.
That movie owned from the first minute to the last. My only gripe, which is a tiny one at that, was that the director kind of teetered between Batman getting the girl at the end. While he didn't get her, it was still happier and more satisfying than Spider-Man getting the girl at the end of the first Spidey film. If you ask me, it should have been clear that he did not get the girl. Though I don't know much about the history of Batman in the comics, so the director may have just been sticking closely to the story in that respect.
I also was not a fan of the Batmobile, but I won't fault it because it's kind of early in Batman's career for him to have ALL his gadgets finely tuned. Plus the car isn't exactly efficient at catching crooks while the tank is. That doesn't mean the car doesn't look cool.
I liked the reference to the Joker at the end, even though I think it was a diversion from the storyline (wasn't Batman responsible for the guy becoming the Joker, or was that just in the movie adaptation of the comic?).
10/10
This movie is a must-see. The only Batman movie better was the original.
That movie owned from the first minute to the last. My only gripe, which is a tiny one at that, was that the director kind of teetered between Batman getting the girl at the end. While he didn't get her, it was still happier and more satisfying than Spider-Man getting the girl at the end of the first Spidey film. If you ask me, it should have been clear that he did not get the girl. Though I don't know much about the history of Batman in the comics, so the director may have just been sticking closely to the story in that respect.
I also was not a fan of the Batmobile, but I won't fault it because it's kind of early in Batman's career for him to have ALL his gadgets finely tuned. Plus the car isn't exactly efficient at catching crooks while the tank is. That doesn't mean the car doesn't look cool.

I liked the reference to the Joker at the end, even though I think it was a diversion from the storyline (wasn't Batman responsible for the guy becoming the Joker, or was that just in the movie adaptation of the comic?).
10/10
This movie is a must-see. The only Batman movie better was the original.
-
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 2:43 pm
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
War of the Worlds 8.5/10, only for the ending. More for the fact that I wasn't really satisfied with it than the fact that it didn't work. I thought that the movie was amazingly well done as far as effects went, but Tom Cruise played the same guy he always does. Him, Cuba Gooding, Jr., Denzel Washington, they ALL play the same guy in every movie.
I really got caught up in the film, I don't want to say it scared me, but it conveyed the sense of fear very well.
I really got caught up in the film, I don't want to say it scared me, but it conveyed the sense of fear very well.
-
- Posts: 10620
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Good flick, loved how dark and gritty it was, none of that pointy titties of val kilmer or george cloony, good acting overall, great effects. gg 8/10
Now they should promptly ram sack the hollywood wear house that keeps backup reels of movies and burn the other horrible contraptions, but the keaton/phipher/jack adaptation can stay. =D
A sequel was also announced, if it wasn't said in this thread already. (but it's not like the ending didn't give it away)
Now they should promptly ram sack the hollywood wear house that keeps backup reels of movies and burn the other horrible contraptions, but the keaton/phipher/jack adaptation can stay. =D
A sequel was also announced, if it wasn't said in this thread already. (but it's not like the ending didn't give it away)

-
- Posts: 2103
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
-
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 8:00 am
War of the Worlds - 3/10
The massive plot oversights were just too cheesy for even me.
Spoilers below!
The aliens planned this attack for so long and left their takeover equipment buried from a million years before (which we'd somehow never found in all our digging). Then they waited until we were stronger and chose to attack in machines that were outdated by a million years. To top it off there is leap in logic where they can travel through space, have advanced shields we can't penetrate, but somehow don't have fucking infrared or thermal sensors. Instead they rely on spotlights and extensible camera arms which can't see people hiding in shadows :icon27:
I just couldn't get past those points enough to enjoy the movie
The massive plot oversights were just too cheesy for even me.
Spoilers below!
The aliens planned this attack for so long and left their takeover equipment buried from a million years before (which we'd somehow never found in all our digging). Then they waited until we were stronger and chose to attack in machines that were outdated by a million years. To top it off there is leap in logic where they can travel through space, have advanced shields we can't penetrate, but somehow don't have fucking infrared or thermal sensors. Instead they rely on spotlights and extensible camera arms which can't see people hiding in shadows :icon27:
I just couldn't get past those points enough to enjoy the movie
