Why Quake 4 rocks so hard

Post by **Duhard** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:29 am

SHUT THE FUCK UP O'DIUM

Post by **mjrpes** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 9:34 am

Hmmm... I might just have to go out and buy this game

Post by **DooMer** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:06 am

Indeed, mrherpes. Indeed.

Post by **rebb** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:08 am

Ok Zombie, admit it, how many clerks did you stab to get this so early ? :icon32:

Post by **phantasmagoria** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 10:26 am

I'm jealous

Post by **MKJ** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:53 am

hey, the edge remake looks like :gasp: the edge! :icon14:

Post by **chris** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:25 pm

Duhard wrote:I have a feeling that "blood rose" map is gonna own..

dude, im in agreement, it looks fucking mint and thats just from a screenshot!

callvote blood rose duals on its release!!

Post by **R00k** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:42 pm

Dear god. I might have to run by EB Games here before work and see if they're selling copies.

Thanks for posting Zombie, you're my new hero. :icon14:

Post by **alright** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:02 pm

How does it feel, physics wise? Is it similar to VQ3 or CPMA... or maybe a combination of both? Really curious about the movement

Post by **R00k** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:06 pm

Yea, and we're still waiting on your system specs, and how playable the game is on them. :icon32:

Post by **busetibi** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:20 pm

There's a shitload of screenshots (MP and SP) here

http://www.dailyrush.dk/features/galler ... arts/3349/

edit: takes a while for it to load

Post by **chris** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:20 pm

I can't remember if it was this forum or another but someone else was quoted playing it on a 2.2 P4 and a 6800 and said they were getting a playable 40fps

Post by **Pext** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:31 pm

whoah... those MP maps look like sex in a can! can't wait to get my hands on this game ( and an internet connection at home

i just moved this weekend... )

Post by **Oeloe** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:09 pm

How about the copy protection? Is it really some starforce proggy you have to install? And do the physics really feel 1:1 with Quake 3, like Tim Willits said (mathematically the same). 60 FPS max, that sux though.

Post by **Eraser** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:17 pm

Oeloe wrote:60 FPS max, that sux though.

No it doesn't.
Everybody thinks high FPS are a necessity. They aren't. 125 fps was only important in Q3 because of the physcis. You won't notice it in Quake 4. Also, it's only it's internal speed. Your videocard will still render maybe 120fps (if it's technically capable of that) but it'll be rendering the exact same scene twice

Post by **Fjoggs** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:19 pm

I'll be happy If I can achieve 20fps.

Post by **iMoose** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:20 pm

Its weird thats there are no bots as they obviously had to create some kind of AI for singleplayer (same with Doom3); I don't know how all that works but couldn't they have just have added it to the multiplayer?
It doesn't matter though. Looking at those screenshots, I know Quake 4 will rule.

Post by **Fjoggs** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:28 pm

SP AI and MP AI is completely different.

Post by **DrWho** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:29 pm

could you post info on q4 server set up and rcon commands please?

Post by **Don Carlos** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:35 pm

Sandstorm looks like a map for winners

Post by **-mess-** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:46 pm

is there anything like "timedemo" or smth?
could you benchmark game with:
1024/full (dunno about fsaa and anizo, or soft shadows)
and 800x600 + low?

and give us more shots of mp maps pls

Post by **chris** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:50 pm

Oeloe wrote:How about the copy protection? Is it really some starforce proggy you have to install? And do the physics really feel 1:1 with Quake 3, like Tim Willits said (mathematically the same). 60 FPS max, that sux though.

Buy it you fag!

We're not talking some shit box film or something you downloaded off the internet, we're talking ID's much loved and anticipated sequel, QUAKE 4.

Post by **Zyte** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:53 pm

nice screens. very nice.

Post by **Don Carlos** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:58 pm

-mess- wrote:is there anything like "timedemo" or smth?
could you benchmark game with:
1024/full (dunno about fsaa and anizo, or soft shadows)
and 800x600 + low?

and give us more shots of mp maps pls

Best idea of the thread!!!

Post by **chris** » Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:00 pm

Don Carlos wrote:
-mess- wrote:is there anything like "timedemo" or smth?
could you benchmark game with:
1024/full (dunno about fsaa and anizo, or soft shadows)
and 800x600 + low?

and give us more shots of mp maps pls
Best idea of the thread!!!

Yeh definitly, i want to see some results!!!

Wanna see how hard my pc rocks against q4

Why Quake 4 rocks so hard

Q4 server set up