Quake3World.com Forums
     ET: Quake Wars Discussion
        New ET:QW shots


Post new topicReply to topic
Login | Profile | | FAQ | Search | IRC




Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Topic Starter Topic: New ET:QW shots

Eh?
Eh?
Joined: 25 Mar 2001
Posts: 32049
PostPosted: 04-16-2007 05:36 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


New Quake Wars shots:

[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/Flying_Escort.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/On_the_Outskirts.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/Coridor_Combat.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/Strogg_Base.jpg[/lvlshot]




Top
                 

True Nightmare
True Nightmare
Joined: 14 Nov 2000
Posts: 4216
PostPosted: 04-16-2007 09:20 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Where did you get those from? There are a couple there that are apparentlyknown in some quarters to be leaked shots from an early build from the beta test.



_________________
Tutorials, tools and resources


Top
                 

One Man Army
One Man Army
Joined: 23 Dec 1999
Posts: 10568
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 01:21 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I'm assuming that entire last post was, because the testers names were blurred, and it looked like ball sack.




Top
                 

Eh?
Eh?
Joined: 25 Mar 2001
Posts: 32049
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 02:54 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Really? Sorry about those ones then.

Shame, those are the ones that made me froth at the mouth too over the menu lol.




Top
                 

4days Joined: 15 Apr 2002
Posts: 8193
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 03:02 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


the crosshairs in one of the pics looked like placeholders too.

that menu did look nifty though.




Top
                 

Insane Quaker
Insane Quaker
Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 283
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 05:21 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


This game still does look pretty good considering it's using an engine released mid 04. Still if this runs as well as Q4 it will be a gift. Though remembering back to Q4 when they said it would run on anything D3 did, the GeForce 4 MX series went plus the ATI 9600 and 9700 IIRC, so I'm not putting hopes up. Not that I really need to with my system, just thinking about those who can't/won't spend that kind of money just to play the latest games.




Top
                 

I'm the dude!
I'm the dude!
Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Posts: 12498
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 06:33 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Good going, Kat... couldn't keep it quiet, could you? :smirk:

@d3mol!t!ion: Even though D3 may have listed those video cards as the minimum requirement, I think that was quite a stretch. Even at the lowest settings, I expect D3 to run as a slideshow. If anything the Q4 requirements were a little more "conservative".

ETQW will have quite a number of improved features, so it's more like the D3.5 engine.



_________________
GtkRadiant | Q3Map2 | Shader Manual


Top
                 

Immortal
Immortal
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 2205
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 11:43 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Think an AMD Athlon XP 2400+ processor with an
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 card and 768mb of ram will be able to run this game at all? I mean like 10-20 fps on minimum settings.

On the topic of those screenshots, I really can't wait to start mapping for this game. This looks like it's going to be a ton of fun.




Top
                 

Eh?
Eh?
Joined: 25 Mar 2001
Posts: 32049
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 12:15 PM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Silicone_Milk wrote:
Think an AMD Athlon XP 2400+ processor with an
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 card and 768mb of ram will be able to run this game at all? I mean like 10-20 fps on minimum settings.

On the topic of those screenshots, I really can't wait to start mapping for this game. This looks like it's going to be a ton of fun.


The FX wont work for shit. It will run but with everything low.




Top
                 

Insane Quaker
Insane Quaker
Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 283
PostPosted: 04-17-2007 03:30 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Yeah good point about those MX/4 cards on D3... and I also agree with o'dium that the FX/5 series will probably run the game like a slideshow as did the MX/4 with D3.




Top
                 

Eh?
Eh?
Joined: 25 Mar 2001
Posts: 32049
PostPosted: 04-21-2007 10:18 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/refinerywb0.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/sewer02cl3.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/ark01id8.jpg[/lvlshot]

[lvlshot]http://www.quakewarscenter.com/cpg148/albums/userpics/10001/valleyls3.jpg[/lvlshot]




Top
                 

Pestilence
Pestilence
Joined: 25 Mar 2002
Posts: 15822
PostPosted: 04-21-2007 10:57 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


Silicone_Milk wrote:
Think an AMD Athlon XP 2400+ processor with an
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 card and 768mb of ram will be able to run this game at all? I mean like 10-20 fps on minimum settings.

On the topic of those screenshots, I really can't wait to start mapping for this game. This looks like it's going to be a ton of fun.


I had an FX5200 and it ran Q4 like shit. On low settings I could get maybe 15 fps. That was with an Athlon XP 2200+. However my GF 6600 runs Q4 just beautifully.




Top
                 

XXXG-00W0
XXXG-00W0
Joined: 27 Dec 2002
Posts: 2891
PostPosted: 04-21-2007 12:10 PM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


true, fx 5200 lagged a bit, you could play. Ugraded to GF 7600 today and no more hickups.




Top
                 

Cool #9
Cool #9
Joined: 01 Dec 2000
Posts: 44135
PostPosted: 04-24-2007 01:05 AM           Profile   Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


damn that looks good. My Radeon 9800Pro will be in a world of hurt :(




Top
                 

Pestilence
Pestilence
Joined: 25 Mar 2002
Posts: 15822
PostPosted: 05-01-2007 08:40 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


I just realized I mistyped. I had the FX 5500 OC not the 5200.




Top
                 

Elite
Elite
Joined: 21 Oct 2001
Posts: 6519
PostPosted: 05-03-2007 09:20 AM           Profile Send private message  E-mail  Edit post Reply with quote


neat




Top
                 
Quake3World.com | Forum Index | ET: Quake Wars Discussion


Post new topic Reply to topic


cron
Quake3World.com
© ZeniMax. Zenimax, QUAKE III ARENA, Id Software and associated trademarks are trademarks of the ZeniMax group of companies. All rights reserved.
This is an unofficial fan website without any affiliation with or endorsement by ZeniMax.
All views and opinions expressed are those of the author.