zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3aRebr75fg
Do you think it should be unlawful to believe an animal can really consent to such behavior?
Do you think it should be unlawful to believe an animal can really consent to such behavior?
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Re: zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
For serious? No. Do you think it should be illegal to believe anything?dzjepp wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3aRebr75fg
Do you think it should be unlawful to believe an animal can really consent to such behavior?
[url=http://www.cafepress.com/stool][img]http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1561/smallstool4td.jpg[/img][/url]
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
Re: zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
looks fake, but even if it weren't, i don't see too much wrong with their behaviour.dzjepp wrote:
Do you think it should be unlawful to believe an animal can really consent to such behavior?
No creature's being harmed here.
And yes, I strongly believe an animal can consent to such behaviour, especially when it's the one doing the fucking.
You don't need verbal articulation to understand certain things. When you interact with a dog or cat, say by providing it food, you don't need to hear it speak to understand that it's enjoying itself.
You'll find out very fast if the situation is non consensual.
Re: zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
rofl. do you think that type of thing doesn't happen in real life?iambowelfish wrote:For serious? No. Do you think it should be illegal to believe anything?dzjepp wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3aRebr75fg
Do you think it should be unlawful to believe an animal can really consent to such behavior?
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
i suspect that our reaction to bestiality is fundamentally no different from historical reactions to h0m0sexuality.
It just was considered downright perverse, and irreducibly wrong.
But, assuming it was possible to regulate bestiality such that no creature was harmed, and diseases were not spread, I don't see a compelling reason to make it illegal.
Some people just need a big horse cock up their arses to get the most out of life. Let em be!
It just was considered downright perverse, and irreducibly wrong.
But, assuming it was possible to regulate bestiality such that no creature was harmed, and diseases were not spread, I don't see a compelling reason to make it illegal.
Some people just need a big horse cock up their arses to get the most out of life. Let em be!
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
Re: zoophiles have a good ol chit chat
theoneandonly wrote:NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
the only right answer is that you should be strung up in a public venue if you ever want to have sex with an animal.
[xeno]Julios wrote:i suspect that our reaction to bestiality is fundamentally no different from historical reactions to h0m0sexuality.
It just was considered downright perverse, and irreducibly wrong.
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
how is this different from:theoneandonly wrote:how about nobody sticks gets penetrated/sticks their pensises into anything that's not human. Is that too old fashioned for you?
"how about nobody sticks/gets penetrated into/by anything that's not of the opposite sex"
You're invoking taboo without any reasoning.
-
- Posts: 6216
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am
you may be on to something, but you still need to articulate a clear argument why bestiality should be outlawed.theoneandonly wrote: The fact is, anyone who wants to have sex with an animal has something very wrong happening in their head and I do not what to interact with a person like that. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT FUCKING ANIMALS...don't spin this into close-mindedness of a new era like the 70s and 80s for faggots.
I don't give a shit about fags, I'm not talking about them.
edit: sexual liberation can go too far. Fucking and getting fucked by animals is too far. Anyone sexually attracted to animals should be gutted.
You have to say why it's going too far.
Comparing it to pedophilia is different - there are very good arguments to be made that the child involved in the relationship will incur psychological damage.
I don't think that is the case with a fully grown male stallion or a frisky dolphin.
-
- Posts: 8696
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am