*nerd rage

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Plan B »

Plan B wrote:Think rage is gonna be sweet.
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by xer0s »

No! Damnit, I refuse to think it will be sweet...
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by obsidian »

xer0s wrote:No! Damnit, I refuse to think...
Fixed. (Kept the "..." because it wouldn't be xer0s if it wasn't retarded)
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Yeahso
Posts: 522
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:23 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Yeahso »

Plan B wrote:Neither a statement nor a command (command? how would that work?)
"think" is an assumption/wish I'm confident will be fulfilled.
"think" can be used as an imperative verb.
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: *nerd rage

Post by fKd »

this thread is funny as hell. so much "rage" over nothing more than speculation... heh
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by obsidian »

New gameplay video. AI looks pretty nifty.

[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Therac-25
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 1999 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Therac-25 »

obsidian wrote:New gameplay video. AI looks pretty nifty.

Looks pretty solid.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Tsakali »

lol@the dude kicking the turret
brisk
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2000 7:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by brisk »

I will say that the animation in RAGE looks stunning.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Tsakali »

yeah the death sequences are very nice. I liked the part where the guy fell down after shot and lifted up his upper boddy while still down only to be finished off.

and the wounded guy limping his way towards the retreat point :up:

in one of the interviews, they did mention that they put alot of effort into making the character animation "organic"
xer0s
Posts: 12446
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2001 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by xer0s »

Tsakali wrote:yeah the death sequences are very nice. I liked the part where the guy fell down after shot and lifted up his upper boddy while still down only to be finished off.

and the wounded guy limping his way towards the retreat point :up:

in one of the interviews, they did mention that they put alot of effort into making the character animation "organic"
Yeah it's cool, but...if you see the same type of animation more than a few times, it begins to be not as realistic. It's almost a catch 22. You want those types of realistic animations, but it's hard to have a unique animation for each individual enemy, especially with a game such as Rage where we might see hundreds or even thousands of different enemies. You start to see the same guys dying the same way over and over, it starts to numb the experience...
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Foo »

That vid looked pretty fun.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Tsakali »

xer0s, that is an issue. However they did mention that the animations were somewhat connected to each character in a variable based automated way, and not just some basic animation they plug in, at time of death. If that means what i think it means is that even a heavier enemy (for example) could go through the same animation but slightly altered to make it look...well, heavier. If they can pull that type of integration off, it might not be a bad thing.
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by obsidian »

There are different ways of executing animation, dynamic and static. Quake III for instance is an example of static animation, the death sequences are predetermined, if health = 0, run frames 30-38. No physics involved and all rigid body animations. Rage looks to be much more complex and it looks like a combination between AI determining the condition of the enemy (type of injury) and animation types for each condition, along with physics and soft body animations. Together, there's a much more dynamic range of animation types available depending on all these factors.

BTW, not sure if you guys saw the spider bot melee the guy behind the crate, it looks like it speared and gibbed the guy with much carnage. I smiled.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by MKJ »

does rage use the Natural Motion engine?
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: *nerd rage

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

xer0s wrote:Yeah it's cool, but...if you see the same type of animation more than a few times, it begins to be not as realistic. It's almost a catch 22. You want those types of realistic animations, but it's hard to have a unique animation for each individual enemy, especially with a game such as Rage where we might see hundreds or even thousands of different enemies. You start to see the same guys dying the same way over and over, it starts to numb the experience...
I see that the naysayers are again insisting on nitpicking. How many animations should the animation department create? I'm not sure if you're aware of this (probably not) but games do have a limited budget and schedule.

In most AAA games over the last 8 years there are almost no AI enemies "dying the same way over and over" due to ragdoll physics.
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36011
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by seremtan »

yeah, but we want AI to smash big glass coffee tables when they die, god damn it!
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by bitWISE »

obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by obsidian »

:olo: WTF?
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Tsakali »

wow, that's a great out of the box ad. gg id :up:
fKd
Posts: 2478
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 2:54 am
Location: Wellington
Contact:

Re: *nerd rage

Post by fKd »

should have been willits and carmack, not random nerd staff... but heh, tiger jump!

*edit- esp for the bad acting that would ensue :olo:
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Eraser »

:olo:
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19174
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Eraser »

obsidian wrote:New gameplay video. AI looks pretty nifty.
Fuck Deus Ex. Shooting people in the FACE never looked better.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by Tsakali »

but there are some physics /animation flaws with the character deaths. check out that dude @ 5:28 after he kicks the turret he gets shot, but he falls back more toward the left than one would expect from the player's position.

Image
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32582
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: *nerd rage

Post by MKJ »

FORWARD.... AND TO THE LEFT
Post Reply