R00k wrote:The purpose of their article wasn't to answer any difficult questions, its mission was to set up all the crazier theories on 9/11 and then knock them down, coming to the conclusion that the official story must be right. But it's pretty irresponsible to say that, since no missiles hit the pentagon, then noone has grounds to be asking any questions.
The purpose of the Pop Mech article was to shut down debate, not to open it up or advance it.
Glenn Reynolds seemed pretty persuaded by the article, so I assumed that was the end of that.
He also didn't make much of this:
[url=http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm]Prison Planet[/url]* wrote:Following the publication of the article and its exaltation by the mainstream media as the final nail in the coffin for 9/11 conspiracy theories, it was revealed that senior researcher on the piece Benjamin Chertoff is the cousin of Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.
* prison planet may be cranky (don't know), but this particularly tidbit wasn't fabricated
lol, you're just a pawn of the mcbushco disinformation campaign. they feed mushrooms like you with bullshit about an inside job to discredit the truth about the mcbushco empire's complicity in the actions of their proxy al-qa'eda which is controlled by their mcCIA asset osama neocon laden
seremtan wrote:lol, you're just a pawn of the mcbushco disinformation campaign. they feed mushrooms like you with bullshit about an inside job to discredit the truth about the mcbushco empire's complicity in the actions of their proxy al-qa'eda which is controlled by their mcCIA asset osama neocon laden