scared? wrote:or in ur case...the worst...

scared? wrote:or in ur case...the worst...
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=define&x=0&y=0Doombrain wrote:as in, the best.seremtan wrote:define 'best'
I thought you were full of shit, but this looks real. Kinda cool, if a bit scary.Turbine wrote:I cant beleive Geoff uses a CRT. Did you know that FBI can read the radio signal emited by them, and read your screen.
If you have Linux you can use a program caled Tempest for Eliza to brodcast FM radio trough your CRT monitor.
Scared?
Turbine wrote:I cant beleive Geoff uses a CRT. Did you know that FBI can read the radio signal emited by them, and read your screen.
If you have Linux you can use a program caled Tempest for Eliza to brodcast FM radio trough your CRT monitor.
Scared?
lol, here we go again.seremtan wrote:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=define&x=0&y=0
k, i'll bite.seremtan wrote: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=define&x=0&y=0
when you're being pedantic, yes.seremtan wrote:was that so hard?
Pooinyourmouth wrote:Last I checked even the crappiest of CRT monitors where all progressive scan. It's only T.V. sets that interleave.
and if i'm not being pedantic and just asking you a simple question?Doombrain wrote:when you're being pedantic, yes.seremtan wrote:was that so hard?
I think what he's going for is that the entire display is "painted' simultaneously. There isn't a scan time. The top left and bottom right pixels display content from the same frame at the same time. But IMO, that's not nearly as important as the ghosting that still seems to plague LCDs.Pooinyourmouth wrote:I'm not sure what you are getting at there. Still does not change the fact that pretty much every computer CRT monitor is progressive scan. It's only old televisions that use interlace.