Page 5 of 34
Re: More Rage
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 11:00 am
by Don Carlos
100
2000
Re: More Rage
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:03 pm
by Unisaw
Re: More Rage
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:14 pm
by brisk
That's not a review.
Re: More Rage
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:50 pm
by Tsakali
that review smelled purple.
Re: More Rage
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:20 pm
by xer0s
Review or not, sounds good.

Re: More Rage
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:37 pm
by SoM
Rage PC specs
Minimum:
* OS: Win XP SP3, Vista, Win 7
* Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo or Equivalent AMD
* Memory: 2GB
* Hard Disk Space: 25GB
* Video Card: GeForce 8800, Radeon HD 4200
Recommended:
* OS: Win XP SP3, Vista, Win 7
* Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad or Equivalent AMD
* Memory: 4GB
* Hard Disk Space: 25GB
* Video Card: GeForce 9800 GTX, ATI Radeon HD 5550
Re: More Rage
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:59 pm
by Deathshroud
Wow, the recommended video cards are pretty weak. That is surprising.
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:09 am
by Tsakali
I call bs
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:11 am
by fKd
recommend does not mean pimp settings. but hell, if it can run on a 360...
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 1:29 am
by brisk
I don't even have 25gb free to install it on my ssd, where steam is stored

Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:20 am
by scared?
consoles have set back video game progress 10 fold...
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:42 am
by DukeNukem#3
fKd wrote:recommend does not mean pimp settings. but hell, if it can run on a 360...
I wonder what the criteria is for measuring recommended settings. Is that just when you can reach a certain average frame rate at medium quality or something?
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:53 am
by Tsakali
fKd wrote:recommend does not mean pimp settings. but hell, if it can run on a 360...
well recommended should atleast mean a 60fps experience right? so i find it hard to believe. I was also going to attribute it to console bottle-necking but I'm pretty sure id is bumping up the 'awesome' on the pc version, so I'm still kind confused about these specs.
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 6:55 am
by Tsakali
scared? wrote:consoles have set back video game progress 10 fold...
on the other hand, being that there is money in consoles and eye candy sells, it means that they try extra hard to optimize their code instead of taking the lazy way out and expecting the new hardware to pick u their slack... so in that respect it's a good thing.
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:23 am
by scared?
fuck u idiot...
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 11:51 am
by Tsakali
owned...next.
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:13 pm
by scared?
the eye candy would be off the charts if it wasn't for consoles...instead everything looks about the same as 5 years ago...
gg moron...
Re: More Rage
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:06 pm
by r3t
more gameplay, coop this time:
http://www.bethblog.com/index.php/2011/ ... ses-co-op/
Re: More Rage
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:31 am
by Eraser
Split screen coop? SPLIT SCREEN COOP?
YES PLEASE!
edit:
apparently there is a split screen option:
And with the Legends of the Wasteland [co-op missions], we thought wouldn’t it be fun to run around a level just shooting guys with your buddy, you know? It’s split-screen, have your friend come over, run through this mission, they’re fun, they tie back to the single player game
That's from an interview with Tim Willits
here
Re: More Rage
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:42 am
by scared?
old...
Re: More Rage
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:04 pm
by fKd
hurry up time...
only nit pick i noticed, insta-disappearing bodies
Re: More Rage
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:16 pm
by Eraser
Oh, EntityPlus
has that problem as well so I can forgive them...

Re: More Rage
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:21 pm
by o'dium
Maybe its just me, but this is a huge disapointment... I was hoping for an actual coop story? But this doesn't look like that at all, it looks, well... Like Horde mode? With an objective throwing in...? Spec Ops?
I dunno, its not real coop as such...
Also, what dumb fucking spick thought it would be a good idea to double information on BOTH screens thats EXACTLY the same...? Thats just piss poor UI design.
I am looking forward to Rage more than I first was, sure, but the uber low res textures and terrible pop in are really not doing it for me right now

I'm sure I'll load it up and have fun, but meh, if only we didn't have consoles holding us back... This is a game that either should have came out a few years ago, or been delayed to the new consoles... IMO, of course...
Re: More Rage
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:26 pm
by xer0s
Re: More Rage
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:41 pm
by scared?
fucking odium...