Q3W member most likely to go on a killing spree?...

[LawL]

So we can justify car and alcohol deaths simply based on the initial design intent?

Can you answer that?

No, by the level of ownership and use.

[YourGrandpa]

No, by the level of ownership and use.

So by level of ownership and use you can justify the deaths because the components that cause them weren't originally designed to kill people?

[LawL]

No, because the deaths and injuries that come as a result pale in direct comparison of ownership and use of guns.

[Captain]

I'm almost insulted they chose you over me. Almost.

You probably get beaten up by fruit flies, tough guy.

[scared?]

There are more guns than cars in the us....
There are more fatalities caused by cars than guns in the us...

[LawL]

People don't use their guns for hours on end on a daily basis as they do their cars, dumbo.

[YourGrandpa]

No, because the deaths and injuries that come as a result pale in direct comparison of ownership and use of guns .

So even though deaths and injuries that come as a result pale in direct comparison of ownership and use of guns you can justify the deaths because the components that cause them weren't originally designed to kill people?

[LawL]

To a much greater extent than that of something that is designed purely for killing.

[YourGrandpa]

So what is the death/injury ratio that is unacceptable for things that weren't initially designed to kill?

Because your current lack of opinion and judgment leave a lot of things "not designed to kill" open to be banned.

[LawL]

1745.6:3.

[losCHUNK]

There are more guns than cars in the us....
There are more fatalities caused by cars than guns in the us...

Even though guns are more common than cars in Yankland n all they're only owned by 33%ish of households (according to stats on prev page), so gun owners are far less common than car owners yet still contribute to a similar death rate and rising, as opposed to cars which is falling with 90% households owning one.

If you kill people with alcohol n all then I'd also very much like to be your next victim

[YourGrandpa]

1745.6:3.

This is where even you realize how stupid your point is/was and the conversation trials off in hopes of exhausting counterparts to the point where they give up so you get the last word.

BTW the way we are nearly there in the gun thread.

Called it.

[Captain]

What do you think "BTW" stands for, fatty?

[LawL]

Called it.

You lose.

[YourGrandpa]

I called it, which automatically means I'm the ultimate winner.

Like always of course.

[LawL]

You called that you would lose, lol nice one.

[YourGrandpa]

I called your ever predictable response.

You will keep responding.

I am right, so therefore I win.

[LawL]

You just responded again, and you're wrong, so you lose.

[YourGrandpa]

I keep winning. Like I always do.

[losCHUNK]

lol, gwamps crushed into obsession. The red mist is so misty he can't see the end

[LawL]

I keep winning. Like I always do.

Gramps is in full meltdown mode, he'll be going on a shooting spree any day now.

[YourGrandpa]

LawL can't stop responding. He's in every thread and comments on every post I make. He's going to go full homo soon.

[YourGrandpa]

U mad bro?

[LawL]

LawL can't stop responding. He's in every thread and comments on every post I make. He's going to go full homo soon.

Gramps just replied yet again, it's very important for him to get the last word. He went full homo a long time ago.

[YourGrandpa]