Page 5 of 10

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:16 pm
by Κracus
losCHUNK wrote:Anyone looking forward to Hillarys arrest ?

If Trump did that I would wish him the best of luck in 4 years.

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:22 pm
by losCHUNK
It was a promise, if he doesn't then he should be sacked imo :)

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:31 pm
by MKJ
Ryoki wrote:How you can have a system where most people vote for person A and the win goes to person B and call it democracy is fucking beyond me.
Technically, not a democracy.

And also

Image

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:32 pm
by losCHUNK
Memphis wrote:Seriously tho for a sec, don't any of you cunts do anything retarded in Yankland in the next few days, like go out wearing a red T-shirt or a MAGA hat. There'll be some very upset, very brain-washed people about and they're pissed at pretty much everybody.
You on about the MAGA hat wearers ? (nvm just seen the word 'dont' )

In 4 yrs it'll be the same 'Thanks Trump' for promising change when really we're just going through the same motions.

Reaganorons, just hope he doesn't tank the economy / piss off Russia / fuck with the middle East in the meantime

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:34 pm
by xer0s
Well, he will be our President. So I hope he does well. Nothing we can do about it now. The sun will continue to shine...

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:37 pm
by losCHUNK

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:39 pm
by plained
xer0s wrote:Well, he will be our President. So I hope he does well. Nothing we can do about it now. The sun will continue to shine...
i like the cut of your jib!

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:40 pm
by losCHUNK
MKJ wrote:
Ryoki wrote:How you can have a system where most people vote for person A and the win goes to person B and call it democracy is fucking beyond me.
Technically, not a democracy.

And also

Image
Aren't the electoral numbers awarded based on population density ?. It kinda makes sense, more so than the UKs version anyway where less than 40% get to run rough shot over the whole country.

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:45 pm
by Ryoki
losCHUNK wrote:Aren't the electoral numbers awarded based on population density ?. It kinda makes sense, more so than the UKs version anyway where less than 40% get to run rough shot over the whole country.
Not quite: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:48 pm
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Image

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 4:22 pm
by Captain
Memphis wrote:I'm not entirely uncertain that some crazed nut might still shoot the cunt.
Why? They all voted for him.

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 4:43 pm
by Captain
So you're telling me that guntards, racists, and the rest of the uneducated piles of protoplasm didn't vote for Trump?

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 5:17 pm
by Captain
Because I'm a Clinton supporter, right?

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 5:29 pm
by Captain
Captain Mazda wrote:She'll be great for the corporations, banks, military-industrial complex, Saudi and Israeli terrorists, the invasion of sovereign countries, unethical subsidies and lobbyists, human rights violators, and the destruction of the environment.

All in all, she'll be great for the status quo.
Captain Mazda wrote:Think of the policies that have been brought forward during Obama's time (TPP for example) and the proxy wars and acts of terrorism his government has initiated. Then remember that Hilary was one of the leading war drummers of his staff and it's not hard to imagine how much worse things will get with her in power, especially with how much more she fellates Netanyahu and his AIPAC cronies compared to Obomba.

I think "the lesser of two evils" approach is what morons say to comfort themselves knowing they're part of a broken system that needs to be torn down but are unwilling to do anything about it.
Captain Mazda wrote:Think of the policies that have been brought forward during Obama's time (TPP for example) and the proxy wars and acts of terrorism his government has initiated. Then remember that Hilary was one of the leading war drummers of his staff and it's not hard to imagine how much worse things will get with her in power, especially with how much more she fellates Netanyahu and his AIPAC cronies compared to Obomba.

I think "the lesser of two evils" approach is what morons say to comfort themselves knowing they're part of a broken system that needs to be torn down but are unwilling to do anything about it.
Captain Mazda wrote:Warmongering piece of shit
Captain Mazda wrote:It's a good thing everyone's so focused on this instead of her countless violations of human rights and international law.
If you say so :)

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 5:30 pm
by seremtan
Captain Mazda wrote:all
BBC wrote:Nationally, Donald Trump has won 47.5% of the vote, with Hillary Clinton taking 47.7%
as to all that 'elites vs the masses' talk: sorry guys, but the elite is a little too big and masses a little too small for that cartoon view to make sense :|

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 5:44 pm
by Captain
Memphis wrote:And yet, you'd choose Clinton over Trump 'cos a Brit comedian made a thoroughly convincing argument that Trump was mean and orange :|
Yeah?
Captain Mazda wrote:You yanktards should be putting all your support in Jill Stein.

Or you could just continue being retarded, either way is good for me.
Captain Mazda wrote:
xer0s wrote:Or Gary Johnson...
Yeah, the guy who supported the invasion of Afghanistan will be a real revolutionary :dork:
Captain Mazda wrote:It's not a war if only one side is attacking.

Jill Stein has always been against war, she's also the only one with the balls and brains to say she would cut support to Saudis and Israelis as well as pardon Snowden. Her views have been vehemently unpopular and anti-establishment.

The first thing Gary Johnson would do as president would be to fast-track the TPP signing, just like Obama.
Captain Mazda wrote:How about putting all your support behind the only candidate who could actually change something?
“Why should a U.S. progressive be calling for more intervention by the Saudi monarchy? Really, we want Saudi troops in Syria and Iraq and Libya and who knows where else? You’d think that perhaps someone like Sanders would say that we have to break our decades-long backing of the corrupt Saudi regime—but no, he wants to dramatically accelerate it.”

Husseini also noted that Blitzer is openly supportive of Israel’s wars, so Sanders’ choice to appear on his show to voice support makes strategic sense, given the growing alliance between Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Sanders, too, has supported Israel’s occupation of Palestine and, despite the hopes of many of his fans, his voting record does not support his apparently antiwar stance. And his statements ignore the ways that Saudi money and the Saudi philosophy of Wahhabism have been key to the success of ISIS.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/bernie-san ... me/209100/

Bernie looks like Clinton next to Jill Stein.
Captain Mazda wrote:
The Jill Stein campaign calls for ending support for governments committing war crimes and massive human rights violations, including Israel and Saudi Arabia.

It supports the BDS movement as a peaceful, nonviolent set of actions organized by civil society across the world aimed to end Israeli apartheid, occupation, war crimes, and systematic human rights abuses.

US foreign policy requires an emergency overhaul, from a program of total global military and economic domination, to a policy promoting international law, human rights and diplomacy. We must cease and desist from being, in the words of Martin Luther King, the greatest purveyor of violence world over. Our foreign policy currently serves war profiteers and fossil fuel companies, but not the American people or the cause of global justice, peace and security. Our failed wars of the past 14 years have cost us 5 trillion dollars, left over a million people dead in Iraq alone, and killed or maimed tens of thousands of US service men and women. Yet we – and the Middle East – are far less secure, not more secure.

In addition to ending our catastrophic and immoral wars for oil and markets, we must stop aiding and abetting the human rights violations and war crimes of our allies who are also massively defying international law. This includes the Israeli government and the rulers of Saudi Arabia.
http://www.jill2016.com/statement_on_us ... el_and_bds
Captain Mazda wrote:I'd vote for Jill Stein if I could.

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 6:59 pm
by seremtan
Memphis wrote:contrarian bellender
never piss in your own shoes, clart

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:38 am
by HM-PuFFNSTuFF
Image

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 1:39 am
by Transient
Yeah, Clinton was a terrible candidate. Bernie would have gotten numbers closer to 2008.

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:30 am
by plained
Bernie heart may be in the right place but not sharp enough or business experienced enough

I like Carson glad trump going to use him he has also of smart good people

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:42 am
by Captain
Memphis wrote:
Captain Mazda wrote:.
Unless you're trying to prove something other than you're being a contrarian bellender, it is known :|
You said I'm not anti-Clinton, I proved I am.
You said I'd have preferred her over Trump, I proved I didn't.

I don't know why I even bother with someone as thick as you, go back to your 40 hours of gaming per week you professional goblin you.

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:14 am
by scared?
Biden would have won... Wonder why he didn't get in race?...

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:25 am
by shaft
Obviously he knew the DNC had already said it was Clintons turn and didn't want to waste his time.

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:27 am
by scared?
Trump didn't win cuz of some movement or whatever... He won cuz Hillary was the shittiest candidate of all time... And she still win popular vote... Lol...

Re: U.S. Election

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:27 am
by Transient
Captain Mazda wrote: You said I'm not anti-Clinton, I proved I am.
You said I'd have preferred her over Trump, I proved I didn't.

I don't know why I even bother with someone as thick as you, go back to your 40 hours of gaming per week you professional goblin you.
He became unreasonable weeks ago, not sure what took you so long.