Page 5 of 5

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:07 am
by losCHUNK
kracus, a question

I know that Kirk's Quarters in the Refit, are on D-deck, Spock's Quarters are on C-deck (ST-III), and in ST-II, it's implied that Saviik and McCoy's quarters might also be on C-deck (in ST-II, after Kirk and Saviic get on, on D-deck, they go up and then Saviic gets off and and McCoy gets on, then they go to the Bridge). I'm thinking that Admiral Kirk's D-deck quarters are a VIP suite, since Decker is Captain in TMP, then Spock is captain in ST-II/III. Does V or VI tell us where his quarters are? I'm wondering if Kirk's quarters in VI are different from his quarters in TMP, because he's not in the VIP suite any more.

Anybody have a clue? There aren't any clues as to where the bunks seen in ST-VI are, either.. is there? I need to re-watch VI, since there was so much signage all over the place, it's easy to miss one.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:24 am
by Chupacabra
Image

java chip frappuccino...my favourite.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:27 am
by Guest
losCHUNK wrote:kracus, a question

I know that Kirk's Quarters in the Refit, are on D-deck, Spock's Quarters are on C-deck (ST-III), and in ST-II, it's implied that Saviik and McCoy's quarters might also be on C-deck (in ST-II, after Kirk and Saviic get on, on D-deck, they go up and then Saviic gets off and and McCoy gets on, then they go to the Bridge). I'm thinking that Admiral Kirk's D-deck quarters are a VIP suite, since Decker is Captain in TMP, then Spock is captain in ST-II/III. Does V or VI tell us where his quarters are? I'm wondering if Kirk's quarters in VI are different from his quarters in TMP, because he's not in the VIP suite any more.

Anybody have a clue? There aren't any clues as to where the bunks seen in ST-VI are, either.. is there? I need to re-watch VI, since there was so much signage all over the place, it's easy to miss one.
nice try

http://flare.solareclipse.net/cgi2/ulti ... 6;t=002575

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:31 am
by tnf
God, chunk actually took the time to search the web for a star trek question to try and troll Kracus. Bad form.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:32 am
by Dave
D-deck VIP quarters for Kirk would make sense, in terms of a) Kirk being a VIP and b) D-deck being appreciably close to supposed VIP facilities (the aft-facing lounge).

However, C-deck for Spock makes a bit less sense, since the quarters we see in the graphic that Chekov points at are on the outer rim of the saucer (more specifically, they are where FJ put the brig complex). I tend to think that Chekov's funny accent is to blame here: Spock may actually resided on deck E or deck G in the movie. (In fact, deck F would be the correct location as per the graphics, but it's less likely that Chekov could mangle the pronunciation of that letter into "C".)

OTOH, having the captain berthed close to the bridge would probably be prudent. Even if his or her official quarters are on deck 5 or something, Spock would no doubt have appropriated a deck 3 broom closet and converted it into his quarters, as this was the logical thing to do...

As for McCoy, his door plate does suggest deck 3 quarters in TOS. So all in all, having all the top officers (Kirk, McCoy, Spock in TOS; Decker/Spock, McCoy and the ghosts of the first officers past, present and future in TFS) berthed on C deck would be a satisfactory solution, even if it means that there's no room for anything else on that deck.

I forget: what is the reason that people generally claim Kirk was berthed on deck 5 in TOS? Was there something specific in "Journey to Babel"? Or do people just go by the fact that Kirk strolled through that deck while on his way to his quarters?

We need a head shaking wtf smilie

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:41 am
by losCHUNK
tnf wrote:God, chunk actually took the time to search the web for a star trek question to try and troll Kracus. Bad form.
actually i typed star trek funny in (or someshit) and couldnt stop laughing at that post

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:43 am
by Guest
I beleive you...

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:44 am
by losCHUNK
no you dont, and i got it from a diff place to you =P

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:53 am
by Guest
yeah I actualy did a google search to see if I could find the awnser and came across that :D

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:58 am
by losCHUNK
what was the answer ?

edit: nvm :ninja:

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 1:00 am
by +JuggerNaut+
7zark7 wrote:
Dave wrote:I drink my tea, earl grey, hot. that's it.. no special crap added to it
Man, there is nothing better than an earl grey, milk, and half a sugar.

* goes to put the kettle on...
7zark7 wrote:
anything tastes good with enough cream and sugar on it.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:00 am
by Scourge
I like the smell and taste of coffee but I don't drink it mainly because I don't need any kind of pick-me-up or whatever in the morning. I'm pretty much awake as soon as I get up. If I do drink anything in the morning, it's usually water.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:03 am
by andyman
Schlokey: do you think that those energy drinks like Red Bull or Sobe Adrenaline are on the same level as coffee or no

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:06 am
by +JuggerNaut+
er...anything with caffeine would be. he's not extremely retarded, only mildly so.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:21 am
by 7zark7
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
7zark7 wrote:
Dave wrote:I drink my tea, earl grey, hot. that's it.. no special crap added to it
Man, there is nothing better than an earl grey, milk, and half a sugar.

* goes to put the kettle on...
7zark7 wrote:
anything tastes good with enough cream and sugar on it.
I hate you.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 2:38 am
by +JuggerNaut+
7zark7 wrote: I hate you.
:lub:

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:02 am
by schlockey
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:er...anything with caffeine would be. he's not extremely retarded, only mildly so.
Exactly.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:06 pm
by Giraffe }{unter
Coffee is like fine wine, without the grogginess. It brings great delight to my tastebuds :icon14:

Having a nice variety of coffee also helps my coffee collection has grown a little since this photo

Image

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:12 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
is that a burr grinder?

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:40 pm
by seremtan
what's that arslikan stuff in the middle that looks like happy shopper?

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:41 pm
by seremtan
and didn't krups build the gas chambers? you must be a nazi mate. a nazi drinking arslikan happy shopper coffee. the worst kind

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:46 pm
by Giraffe }{unter
seremtan wrote:what's that arslikan stuff in the middle that looks like happy shopper?
what is happy shopper?

Arlistan was a gift from a friend who visited from Argentina, good shit though :icon14:

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:48 pm
by Nightshade
My lord, ditch the instant shite, n00b.

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:17 pm
by seremtan
Giraffe }{unter wrote:
seremtan wrote:what's that arslikan stuff in the middle that looks like happy shopper?
what is happy shopper?
happy shopper is an ultracheap bargain brand in the uk made from dust and other floor sweepings. the label on that arsliker stuff reminded me of it

Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 8:48 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Giraffe }{unter wrote:
seremtan wrote:what's that arslikan stuff in the middle that looks like happy shopper?
what is happy shopper?

Arlistan was a gift from a friend who visited from Argentina, good shit though :icon14:
well, is it?