Page 42 of 535

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:26 pm
by CrinklyArse
LOTR - Two Towers.
On Channel 4 reet this moment, fine film :)

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:39 pm
by seremtan
War of the Worlds 7/10 - excellent special fx, and well done as you'd expect from spielberg, but too many cliches for a higher opinion. the whole lousy-dad-and-husband-whose-wife-left-him-for-a-richer-man-but-who-proves-himself-in-the-end-and-wins-back-the-respect-of-his-kids routine is pretty old

Serenity 10/10 - fucking top drawer all the way. joss whedon hits another homer :icon14:

watching kingdom of heaven right now. a little cliched and orlando bloom is his usual plank-like self but not bad so far

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:42 pm
by seremtan
random name wrote:Craptastic 4 - another craptacular movie based on some second rate comic. 0.23/10
think i've seen that one. not a patch on craptastic 3 though, in which dracula teams up with spiderman and poirot and they find el dorado and blah blah zzzzzzzzz :icon29:

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:44 pm
by seremtan
Grudge wrote:lol, I just watched Episode III too, and I have to agree that Hayden Christensen does suck fucking donkey cock.

I just wish that George Lucas would have stayed the fuck away from the scriptwriting and the directing of episode 1-3. Sure, he could have written the story, and perhaps produced it, but why the fuck didn't he hire a decent script writer and a good director instead of completely fucking the entire franchise right in the ass by directing it himself?

There are a few nuggets in there that does feel like the "old" star wars I know and love, and I see that the intentions are there for it to be a great story, but the execution totally ruins the entire experience. It's a pity all that potential is ruined by Lucas taking on a job he can't handle.
tbh i though episode 3 was the best of the 3

i know, that's not a sterling recommendation

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:33 pm
by losCHUNK
ep3 was def the best and i thought it was alright

nowhere near as good as the originals, but a huge improvement on his other shining pieces of shit

Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:53 pm
by sliver
jarhead: boring.

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:00 am
by Nightshade
I watched Jarhead last night and I found it to be an excellent film, albleit not quite true to the book. I did think that Jamie Foxx's character was a weak stereotype, but I blame that more on the director than Foxx.

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:04 am
by sliver
The entire movie was a weak stereotype.

Full Metal Jacket bootcamp scene? check.
Apocalypse Now screening? check.
Shower scene? check.
Bunch of macho BS? check.
Guy making friends with a corpse, again like FMJ? check.
Any real plot? Nope.

I appreciate that the film successfully conveyed Swofford's impressions of armed service, but that doesn't make it worthy of being a two hour movie.

A bunch of combat scenes wouldn't have made it any better, for me it just didn't have anything about it that really seemed to entitle it to its film adaption. (Haven't read the book, btw.)

edit: and I feel almost like Sam Mendes' direction is devolving. American Beauty was everything a good movie should be, Road to Perdition had the same lovely direction but less plot, and now Jarhead was pretty lacking in both departments. MEndes seems to be lost without real buildings -- that or his DP had Downs.

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:19 am
by Geebs
Brothers Grimm: 6/10. Better than I thought it was going to be and pretty funny, but not a classic by any stretch of the imagination.

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:37 am
by Hannibal
D.E.B.S: 7/10 Hot lesbian spygirl falls for hot lesbian super villian. I usually don't go for 'cute' movies, but this one sucked me (literally) in.

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:40 am
by Guest
Boondock Saints - 10/10

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:05 am
by Nightshade
sliver wrote:The entire movie was a weak stereotype.

Full Metal Jacket bootcamp scene? check.
Apocalypse Now screening? check.
Shower scene? check.
Bunch of macho BS? check.
Guy making friends with a corpse, again like FMJ? check.
Any real plot? Nope.

I appreciate that the film successfully conveyed Swofford's impressions of armed service, but that doesn't make it worthy of being a two hour movie.

A bunch of combat scenes wouldn't have made it any better, for me it just didn't have anything about it that really seemed to entitle it to its film adaption. (Haven't read the book, btw.)

edit: and I feel almost like Sam Mendes' direction is devolving. American Beauty was everything a good movie should be, Road to Perdition had the same lovely direction but less plot, and now Jarhead was pretty lacking in both departments. MEndes seems to be lost without real buildings -- that or his DP had Downs.
Perhaps what you're missing here is that movies about Marines' experiences are going to have commonalities. No plot? The whole point of the movie was simply to relate Swofford's experience. It was the plot.
I did find myself thinking that if you hadn't been in the service, and specifically in the Corps, there would be elements of the film that just wouldn't matter.
Do yourself a favor and read the book. It was far better than the movie, and there were some important items that were left out. Swofford does a brilliant job of explaining the futility and insanity of his life in the Corps, and I'll admit that the film did not do this justice. I've seen better movies, and I'm certainly biased, but I liked it.

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 5:42 am
by +JuggerNaut+
Sin City - 7/10 Visually stunning, fantastic style

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - 7/10 Depp was fantastic, the usual Burton's genius visuals

Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:25 am
by MKJ
Boondock Saints; 7/10

After two Irish brothers (Sean Patrick Flanery and Norman Reedus) get into a barfight that gets out of hand, they take it upon themselves to rid the world of evil, one criminal at a time. Their ways are made up as they go along and therefore manage to stay one step ahead of the police.
Federal Agent Smecker (Willem Dafoe), who is leading the investigation, finds that his fascination for their motives is higher than the desire to capture them :o

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:48 pm
by Ryoki
I accidentally watched most of Dogma on the telly the other day. I confused it for a jay & silent bob movie at first, but soon i was slapped about with christian stuff like there was no tomorrow. It wasn't the good kind of christian slapping either, no, they shamefully backed away from ridiculing the entire religion like they should have and made the entire thing a boring 'honest' spirituality vs blind catholic fundamentalism freakshow.

Dissapointing.

2/10

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:55 pm
by Don Carlos
Ryoki wrote:I accidentally watched most of Dogma on the telly the other day. I confused it for a jay & silent bob movie at first, but soon i was slapped about with christian stuff like there was no tomorrow. It wasn't the good kind of christian slapping either, no, they shamefully backed away from ridiculing the entire religion like they should have and made the entire thing a boring 'honest' spirituality vs blind catholic fundamentalism freakshow.

Dissapointing.

2/10
:icon28:

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 8:12 pm
by Grudge
Yes, Dogma was a huge disappointment.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:28 pm
by diego
Doom: The Movie.
10/10 because i was severely drunk and cannot remember anything of it.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:50 pm
by dzjepp
Jarhead. Yeah it was ok. 7/10

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2005 11:53 pm
by Deathshroud
Crash 7/10

Good movie, I hated that fuckin Persian guy the moment he opened his mouth. >:E

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 3:39 am
by redfella
Vanilla Sky - 8/10

Watched it right before bed, couldn't sleep till two hours before I normally get up. :D

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:28 am
by MKJ
redfella wrote:Vanilla Sky - 8/10

Watched it right before bed, couldn't sleep till two hours before I normally get up. :D
thats cause the movie is about 21 fucking hours long

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:31 am
by Don Carlos
MKJ wrote:
redfella wrote:Vanilla Sky - 8/10

Watched it right before bed, couldn't sleep till two hours before I normally get up. :D
thats cause the movie is about 21 fucking hours long
lol :icon26:

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:44 pm
by r3t
riddla wrote:Requiem For A Dream : 11/10

Darren Aronofsky is a fucking genius filmmaker.
agreed! I saw it this weekend for the first time. What a fantastic movie, very gripping and actually pretty shocking too. They should show this movie in highschool, everyone will be instantly cured of any interest in drugs whatsoever.

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:31 pm
by Jackal
Darren Aronofsky will be directing an episode of Lost this season.