Having seen the film, I think you just spoiled the whole plot there, Whiskey 7. Glad I've already seen it.Whiskey 7 wrote:Source Code
[spoilers deleted]
The mention of time travel intrigued me.
[spoilers deleted]
Yes, not bad. 6.5/10
Iron Man 3
5/10
Despite a slightly complicated (and quite good) plot and being 2 hours long, not much happens in this film. The special effects set-pieces seemed to need a bigger screen than I watched it on, and maybe 3D aswell, to be as dramatic as the director seemed to want them to be. Maybe one to watch again when I have a great big screen. Not really suited to small screen viewing, in other words. That's fair enough; I'm not really faulting the director for that; I want films made for the big screen; I intend to get one eventually and have stuff to watch on it that makes it worth having.
As a result of not really appreciating the action set-pieces (small screen), I noticed the lack somewhat of character development more (than I would have). Geared more towards action, without the action being so great, the film doesn't have much to offer. There is some character development, yes; but the interesting personalities that the previous 2 films had don't get much chance to interact, cause any of that has to make way for another action set-piece befire it can really develop.
Bascically, too much time is given over to action sequences and not enough to the characters themselves. At least on a small screen, that much is noticible to the point of making the film at times uninspiring and pretty undramatic; for, without compelling characterisation (fault: director; the acting was fine) why would we particularly care what happens to any of the characters?

The director doesn't seem to realise what good actors he's got playing Iron Man and Pepper Potts, or doesn't particularly care. It seems a lot of opportunity for great drama was wasted.
Even the wedding was blink-and-you'll-miss-it: just a 3 second fade in from black shot of them standing married then fade out to black during a montage of such fades. This is in a 2 hour long film, too; as if they didn't have time.
Despite all this, I was left wanting more, and look forward to a sequel. I just hope that the director allows for - basically - more acting in it.