Page 6 of 16
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:10 pm
				by chopov
				I read somewhere, that photo was taken through a transparent dust cover on the lens, which istn't taken off yet.
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:20 pm
				by TruthfulLiar
				wait, what
canted slope, always?
bullshit
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:20 pm
				by GONNAFISTYA
				Memphis wrote:xer0s wrote:srsly?
wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.
 
I srsly lolled at this.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:25 pm
				by xer0s
				srsly?
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:43 pm
				by Transient
				Yeah, the planet is crooked. 

 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:02 pm
				by seremtan
				Curiosity needs a special handbrake to stop it rolling off the edge of Mars
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:22 pm
				by Tsakali
				/changes channel
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:48 pm
				by Whiskey 7
				Tsakali wrote:......... I'd pay 5-10 grand for a sit before I'd have to reevaluate my enthusiasm on the issue. 
What would you pay realistically?
I'd pay that much, but given these low Earth orbital flights take approx, 15 - 30 minutes it would be a quick trip.
For the same $5k dollars today you can jump in an aircraft and experience weightlessness. Not the same though 
 
click
Current cost (?) ; Virgin Galactic in Vehicle: SpaceShipTwo; Price; $200,000 per passenger
 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:31 am
				by Eraser
				Memphis wrote:xer0s wrote:srsly?
wherever you stand on mars, you're facing downhill.
 
ffs  

 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:01 pm
				by Doombrain
				
Heads up
 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:37 pm
				by xer0s
				Input!  Innnput!
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:51 pm
				by Transient
				
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:14 pm
				by bitWISE
				[lvlshot]http://www.uahirise.org/images/2012/details/cut/mt-sharp-oblique.jpg[/lvlshot]
"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:32 pm
				by xer0s
				Central mound 

 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:33 pm
				by menkent
				that instant-stick-communicator is pretty funny. minimum distance from earth to mars is 54600000km. let's say the stick has a mass of 1kg per 100m (a very light stick, as these things go). Can you imagine the force required to even jiggle a 546 million kilogram stick? For comparison, that's about 75x the mass of the Eiffel Tower.
edit: also not sure about the physics of that sort of thing but I assume the entire stick wouldn't move as one piece... more likely some sort of wave propagating along it.  

 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:41 pm
				by obsidian
				bitWISE wrote:"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
 
 Wish I had a bunch of monitors arranged next to each other to use that as a wallpaper.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:26 pm
				by seremtan
				^ this
NASA have given no thought whatsoever to the desktop market 

 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:27 pm
				by Tsakali
				that's big enough to print, I might just do that.
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:14 am
				by Whiskey 7
				bitWISE wrote:[lvlshot]    large image Thanks  

    [/lvlshot]
"Amazing High Resolution Photo from the HiRISE Camera on MRO of the Central Mound of Mt. Sharp taken 24 Hours after the MSL Landed "
 
Bottom left and elsewhere colours/texture patterns look like water doesn't it 

 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:21 am
				by seremtan
				it isn't water
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:57 am
				by Tsakali
				
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:11 am
				by xer0s
				Awesome.
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:23 pm
				by Plan B
				
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:38 pm
				by GONNAFISTYA
				
That's not the same rover, you cyster-humping douchebag.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: mars landing
				Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:44 pm
				by seremtan
				^ awesome
and no, obviously it's not the same rover
derp