Quake3World

Hey dumbo... Earlier votes went to Romney in 2012... Early votes always swing Republican... Get some context dipshit....

Also...endingthefed.com? Lol morons...

Memphis wrote:So, Shillery will win 'cos identity politics. K

No, she'll win because of our broken 2-party system.

[youtube]s7tWHJfhiyo[/youtube]

seremtan wrote:OH SHI-

http://endingthefed.com/early-president ... s-are.html

Meanwhile Texas is in play for Dems this year, which is new. Keep in mind that typically early voters lean red, with blue votes coming in closer and closer to election day. So the gap will narrow and possibly even flip on the 8th.

seremtan wrote:OH SHI-

http://endingthefed.com/early-president ... s-are.html

that's dated October 5th.



from an hour ago ^

LOL, like I was saying.

Hillary is doing way better than Obama did in 2012 early voting...

what's the deal with early voting anyway? does everything have to have a trailer?

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:I invite any of the (couple?) Trump supporters here to list the things that will make Trump a good president.

i can't think of a single thing.

Memphis wrote:

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:i can't think of a single thing.

That's your failing then. Buckle-up buckaroo

I'm waiting to be enlightened...

he is ahead in fla!

Memphis wrote:

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:i can't think of a single thing.

That's your failing then. Buckle-up buckaroo

Can you succeed where he failed?

here comes trouble!

Memphis wrote:That's your failing then.

I too await most anxiously the arguments for Trump over Clinton.

incoming youtube video!

incoming egg on face!

GTI

I could tell you now but I'm going to wait until something that's never going to happen, happens. How convenient. Not feeling emboldened enough yet?

Rapey, gross shut-in lacks the confidence to explain his point of view, shocking.

If it doesn't happen he can explain his thinking of why it was going to.

Don't forget - Brexit wasn't going to happen either. All the experts and polls etc said "Nope". Then people voted for reals...

Don Carlos wrote:
Don't forget - Brexit wasn't going to happen either. All the experts and polls etc said "Nope". Then people voted for reals...

Although true that it was the popular opinion, its not quite the same is it ?. Not long before the Tories took victory with a landslide - something the polls.never predicted whilst (thanks to the fptp system) UKIP were left with 1 seat with farage losing thanet south. They gained in the popular vote but this seemed to be more a backlash against the lib dems.

Brexit had a good rhetoric, a faceless institution of rule makers with little defence from anyone. Trump on the other hand has shown himself to be just as incompetent as those twats, being one of them and has managed to offend everyone that isnt a white working class male.

And the polls did predict it, i gave a thread with running commentry , I believe i was arguing with semen about it.

Found it

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=52048&p=1022700&hilit=goodbye+europe#p1022700

losCHUNK wrote:the Tories took victory with a landslide

"landslide"

LMAO @ anyone who thinks Trump isn't part of the establishment.

I'm quite certain it will be lost on you but here's a good article...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nomi-prin ... 27244.html

How anyone who has even the most marginal awareness of Trump over the last several decades could see him as anti-establishment is beyond me.

Also he's has a record as long as the Great Wall of China as a liar who ONLY ever acts in his own self interest. If he somehow got elected he wouldn't do squat for non-rich people.

Memphis wrote:

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:LMAO @ anyone who thinks Trump isn't part of the establishment.

Oh, no. There's no media/political/special interest bias against Trump whatsoever is there. No, no, no

Um there is media/political/special interest bias against Clinton too. (is this your first election campaign?) I suppose she isn't part of the establishment either.

What a rube.

Memphis wrote:Oh, no. There's no media/political/special interest bias against Trump whatsoever is there. No, no, no

Dude, media sells newspapers / pageviews / ads / etc. It seems you think their motto is 'report the truth objectively' when it really is 'report what you think is the truth in the most entertaining way'.

What do you even mean with a media bias against Trump? From where i'm sitting they spent 6 months building him up because Trump related news sells (someone calculated how much free ads it translated to, can't recall but it was mental) - and now they're finally calling his bullshit. As they should, for it's utter utter bullshit.