PHOTOS PLEASE

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Image
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

good colour innit!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

ha, nice
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

is that banding on the display, or the image? 3200iso?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
User avatar
plained
Posts: 16366
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 am

Post by plained »

i always prefer sony skintones

jus imo personal pref
it is about time!
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Dave wrote:It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
you tried a polarizer or long exposure?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

plained wrote:i always prefer sony skintones

jus imo personal pref
sony CCDs suck ass
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Doombrain wrote:
Dave wrote:It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
you tried a polarizer or long exposure?
nah.. a polarizer would wipe out the display :p

it was more of a decisive moment thing than a go back and do it again situation
Pete
Posts: 1076
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:03 am

Post by Pete »

My kitchen window with my crap camera but just to show you how amazing a frosty window can become a piece of art.


Image
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Dave wrote:
Doombrain wrote:
Dave wrote:It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
you tried a polarizer or long exposure?
nah.. a polarizer would wipe out the display :p

it was more of a decisive moment thing than a go back and do it again situation
not a circular polarizer
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

Pete wrote:My kitchen window with my crap camera but just to show you how amazing a frosty window can become a piece of art.


Image
attack of the tapeworm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
A1yssa
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 7:00 am

Post by A1yssa »

Dave wrote:Image
Really cool shot!

:)
Dave
Posts: 6986
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Dave »

Thanks :)

Time for more

Image
Chupacabra
Posts: 3783
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2001 7:00 am

Post by Chupacabra »

Pete wrote:My kitchen window with my crap camera but just to show you how amazing a frosty window can become a piece of art.


Image
interesting
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Duhard »

*kisses himself*
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

Yay, I can contribute!

Image Image

If it looks like they were taken with a $20 camera and scanned on a disused negative scanner, it's because they were. :shrug:

These are the ones that came out the best without any editing. I'm gonna start fucking around with cleaning them up and fixing the overexposure a bit. Any pro-tips are appreciated.
l0g1c
Posts: 1838
Joined: Tue May 07, 2002 7:00 am

Post by l0g1c »

I call this one, "Lots of smeared lights"

Image
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

the goggles... they do something?!?
A1yssa
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 7:00 am

Post by A1yssa »

Dave wrote:Thanks :)

Time for more

Image
Shutter Speed & F Number?
Iso?
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Post by Doombrain »

its all in the metadata
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
A1yssa
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 7:00 am

Post by A1yssa »

Doombrain wrote:its all in the metadata
How do I see the metadata? I tried with properties but no info... :(
Fender
Posts: 5876
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 8:00 am

Post by Fender »

A1yssa
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 7:00 am

Post by A1yssa »

Thank you!
:)
mac
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by mac »

Dave wrote: Image

i like that.. very nice colors..


havent posted in a while.. no time to make images and no time to dig through the old library :\ .. anyway


a little fellow on the run.. on my hand ;) thoose little bugs can be pretty fast for macro hehe

Image



i liked the sky that evening

Image
Post Reply