Page 57 of 284
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:46 pm
by Dave
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:53 pm
by Doombrain
good colour innit!
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:55 pm
by R00k
ha, nice
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:00 pm
by Doombrain
is that banding on the display, or the image? 3200iso?
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:05 pm
by Dave
It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:06 pm
by plained
i always prefer sony skintones
jus imo personal pref
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:09 pm
by Doombrain
Dave wrote:It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
you tried a polarizer or long exposure?
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:10 pm
by Doombrain
plained wrote:i always prefer sony skintones
jus imo personal pref
sony CCDs suck ass
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:13 pm
by Dave
Doombrain wrote:Dave wrote:It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
you tried a polarizer or long exposure?
nah.. a polarizer would wipe out the display
it was more of a decisive moment thing than a go back and do it again situation
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:17 pm
by Pete
My kitchen window with my crap camera but just to show you how amazing a frosty window can become a piece of art.

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:20 pm
by Doombrain
Dave wrote:Doombrain wrote:Dave wrote:It's the display.. I don't know if I'm going to keep it or try to get rid of it. I couldn't figure out how to shoot the display at an angle without getting the pattern. A few of the photos I tried also had a red/blue pattern.
you tried a polarizer or long exposure?
nah.. a polarizer would wipe out the display
it was more of a decisive moment thing than a go back and do it again situation
not a circular polarizer
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:20 pm
by Doombrain
Pete wrote:My kitchen window with my crap camera but just to show you how amazing a frosty window can become a piece of art.

attack of the tapeworm
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:29 pm
by A1yssa
Dave wrote:
Really cool shot!

Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:58 pm
by Dave
Thanks
Time for more

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:11 am
by Chupacabra
Pete wrote:My kitchen window with my crap camera but just to show you how amazing a frosty window can become a piece of art.

interesting
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:23 am
by Duhard
*kisses himself*
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:18 am
by l0g1c
Yay, I can contribute!
If it looks like they were taken with a $20 camera and scanned on a disused negative scanner, it's because they were.
These are the ones that came out the best without any editing. I'm gonna start fucking around with cleaning them up and fixing the overexposure a bit. Any pro-tips are appreciated.
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:24 am
by l0g1c
I call this one, "Lots of smeared lights"

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:26 am
by Massive Quasars
the goggles... they do something?!?
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:28 am
by A1yssa
Dave wrote:Thanks
Time for more

Shutter Speed & F Number?
Iso?
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:56 am
by Doombrain
its all in the metadata
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:17 pm
by A1yssa
Doombrain wrote:its all in the metadata
How do I see the metadata? I tried with properties but no info...

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:29 pm
by Fender
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:07 pm
by A1yssa
Thank you!

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:10 pm
by mac
Dave wrote:

i like that.. very nice colors..
havent posted in a while.. no time to make images and no time to dig through the old library :\ .. anyway
a little fellow on the run.. on my hand

thoose little bugs can be pretty fast for macro hehe
i liked the sky that evening
