Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:58 am
because the floor is blue
Page 60 of 284
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:07 am
Also, the lights are bright. Where is that? Local HS?
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:15 am
The lights aren't bright, I was shooting at 3200 with a shutter speed around 320 at f/2. It's a D1 gym, not a HS.
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:17 am
Oh shit, my bad. I was just looking at the mascot and mostly going off of my limited experiences with gyms.
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:42 pm
Wonderful shot! :icon28:Dave wrote:
a little over saturated.. i guess it's time to recalibrate the monitor
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 2:12 pm
a fair amount of noise in there ey?
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:59 pm
Hey, just wondering if you still shoot any B&W film? If so, what are you shooting?Dave wrote:I'm borrowing one from the journalism school here. I've been thinking about getting one. You can pick up a used 'blad for "cheap" on KEH. I'm really liking the square format. Too bad getting it in digital isn't practical at the moment.
I've always wanted a blad but never really crazy enough to invest in it(lens cost). Instead I picked up a used M645 1000s w/prism, 55mm, 80mm macro for less than $900 many years ago. Prior to using this I had a Mamiya 7II w/80mm, 43mm.
I just bought a Nikon flash from KEH for $45(used). That same used flash here is $140 :icon27:
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:44 pm
It's ISO 3200... I'd say it's relatively noise freeplained wrote:a fair amount of noise in there ey?
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:52 pm
Anyone have any experience with a Pentax K1000? Reason I ask is a friend of mine just bought one for his girlfriend (she's doing some kind of photography class where they only use film, I thought they would switch to digital now days?).
Now apparently according to him and her teacher their an amazing camera which everyone wants. Whereas, from what I gather it's just a good cheap beginner SLR camera, nothing too special. Any opinions? I don't want them to think it's the best camera in the world and waste lots of money on it.
I know hardly anything about film. My Dad used to use film SLRs and I have a few of his old cameras/lenses around but that's generally all I know about them.
Now apparently according to him and her teacher their an amazing camera which everyone wants. Whereas, from what I gather it's just a good cheap beginner SLR camera, nothing too special. Any opinions? I don't want them to think it's the best camera in the world and waste lots of money on it.
I know hardly anything about film. My Dad used to use film SLRs and I have a few of his old cameras/lenses around but that's generally all I know about them.
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 3:08 am
I've got one.. it's nothing special. You can get some nice Zeiss lenses for it. I stole mine from work since no one uses it any more
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 3:10 am
I've only ever used Tri-X 400. If I were going to use something else I'd probably use some 3200 film like TMX because I like the high contrast and thick grain it producesFanaticX wrote:Hey, just wondering if you still shoot any B&W film? If so, what are you shooting?Dave wrote:I'm borrowing one from the journalism school here. I've been thinking about getting one. You can pick up a used 'blad for "cheap" on KEH. I'm really liking the square format. Too bad getting it in digital isn't practical at the moment.
I've always wanted a blad but never really crazy enough to invest in it(lens cost). Instead I picked up a used M645 1000s w/prism, 55mm, 80mm macro for less than $900 many years ago. Prior to using this I had a Mamiya 7II w/80mm, 43mm.
I just bought a Nikon flash from KEH for $45(used). That same used flash here is $140 :icon27:
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:24 am
Ahh thanks. By the way, I was showing them your flickr page, they seemed impressedDave wrote:I've got one.. it's nothing special. You can get some nice Zeiss lenses for it. I stole mine from work since no one uses it any more
.Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:56 pm
page onedmmh wrote:maybe some of you people like to get into lomography....check an cool example @ http://www.absolut.com/lomo
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:55 pm
DB, I meant to ask you...what's the cheapest way to get to France from the UK? Ferry? Fly? I know the Eurostar is also an option. Have you been to France? Any tips you can share?
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:33 pm
Late night Eurostar will cost you £22 to get to the UK. Ferry is your best option if you aint driving as you can get plenty of buses to London then.
France is ok, just full of French people. Only thing that lets it down really
I'm not DB but i am from the same country...
France is ok, just full of French people. Only thing that lets it down really
I'm not DB but i am from the same country...
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:03 pm
Beautiful dancer!
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:17 am
okayDoombrain wrote:page onedmmh wrote:maybe some of you people like to get into lomography....check an cool example @ http://www.absolut.com/lomo
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:21 am
too much makeup
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:40 am
Is that Vista running on your PC?Dave wrote:
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:23 am
of course
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:27 am
Just couldn't remember when you posted that pic, if you're switched to Vista yet.
That scheme looks nice.
That scheme looks nice.
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:30 am
Maybe... :icon25:dmmh wrote:maybe some of you people like to get into lomography....check an cool example @ http://www.absolut.com/lomo
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:03 am
dave do you have that dell screen pic in a higher res, that is 1920x1200? :icon32: wanna make it my desktop and see how i liek it
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:12 am
that is a wonderful pic daev. it's more than a pic... it plays with my head.
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:11 pm
No, not that oneMKJ wrote:dave do you have that dell screen pic in a higher res, that is 1920x1200? :icon32: wanna make it my desktop and see how i liek it
:lub:mjrpes wrote:that is a wonderful pic daev. it's more than a pic... it plays with my head.
