Page 7 of 11
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:04 pm
by R00k
Not to mention the fact that there is a thoroughly-researched, 600-page book, that's the best-selling 9/11 book in the country - second only to the official 9/11 comission's book - which accuses cheney of being a murderer, and no one has refuted any of the facts in it, much less the accusations.
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:16 pm
by Freakaloin
nice shill piece for the govt...this little propaganda piece has been destroyed already...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:00 pm
by Fender
Thank you for bringing some sanity to this thread.
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:01 pm
by Freakaloin
lol...seriously...that popular mechanics piece was ripped to shreds point by point...i'll look for the link...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:19 pm
by Freakaloin
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:24 pm
by Nightshade
Freakaloin wrote:
nice shill piece for the govt...this little propaganda piece has been destroyed already...
You are a complete fucking idiot.
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:25 pm
by Freakaloin
no actually nerdshade...u r...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:29 pm
by losCHUNK
no actually, nerdshades right
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:29 pm
by Nightshade
The fact that you believe a tenth of the shit you post is frightening. You have no technical knowledge or experience whatsoever, and you blindly swallow all manner of wacked-out crap posted by every loon on the net.
I reiterate, you are a complete fucking idiot.
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:33 pm
by Freakaloin
the fact u believe what the govt and msm r telling u is sad in itself...next ur gonna say something retarded like jesus christ was the son of god...wow...just wow...
but leaders like george bush thank u for ur support and ignorance...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:40 pm
by losCHUNK
its no worse than you believing everything that is put against gwb
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:41 pm
by Freakaloin
i don't...and ur being dumb again...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:45 pm
by losCHUNK
looks like it to me and it seems like being dumb to you means disagreeing with everything you just said
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:47 pm
by Freakaloin
of course it looks like that to u...ur clueless...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:50 pm
by losCHUNK
just the same as you
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:50 pm
by Freakaloin
not really...just the opposite...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:52 pm
by losCHUNK
i bet you like to think that, just like most window lickers
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:53 pm
by Freakaloin
fox and friends is on...better go check it out dude...
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:54 pm
by losCHUNK
dont get that show over here
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:57 pm
by SplishSplash
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/tower ... index.html
After reading this, I'm pretty sure there is no way that both towers could have collapsed the way they did without explosives.
Making buildings come down like that is pretty hard to do even if you do use explosives. How big are the chances that two (2!!!) towers collapse
perfectly after such random attacks on their structure?
Not very high, I'd say.
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 4:03 pm
by Freakaloin
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 5:15 pm
by chopov
IMO it is irrelevant whether the collapsing of the towers was caused by intentional explosions or the planes/fire or both combined. They would have come down as smooth as they came down either way. How else they should have come down? Fall over? No way. Not a building that weights far over 500.000 tons (keyword: inertia).
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 5:31 pm
by R00k
http://www.robertscheer.com/
What We Don't Know About 9/11 Hurts Us
Suppressed portion of official report is damning
February 15, 2005 – Would George W. Bush have been reelected president if the public understood how much responsibility his administration bears for allowing the 9/11 attacks to succeed?
The answer is unknowable and, at this date, moot. Yet it was appalling to learn last week that the White House suppressed until after the election a damning report that exposes the administration as woefully incompetent if not criminally negligent. Belatedly declassified excerpts from still-secret sections of the 9/11 commission report, which focus on the failure of the Federal Aviation Administration to heed multiple warnings that Al Qaeda terrorists were planning to hijack planes as suicide weapons, make clear that this tragedy could have been avoided.
A federal judge also ruled the other day that another supressed report had to be released to the public. This one contains information about how many warnings the FBI received prior to 9/11, and why they failed to act on any of them.
It is now a matter of public record that the FAA, the CIA and the FBI all had specific advanced warnings about the attacks and nothing was done.
How much clearer can it be?
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 5:35 pm
by SplishSplash
chopov wrote:IMO it is irrelevant whether the collapsing of the towers was caused by intentional explosions or the planes/fire or both combined. They would have come down as smooth as they came down either way. How else they should have come down? Fall over? No way. Not a building that weights far over 500.000 tons (keyword: inertia).
LOL (keyword: retard)
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 5:42 pm
by Freakaloin
yeah and what about wtc7?