Page 7 of 535

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:35 am
by MKJ
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
MKJ wrote:
feedback wrote: Don't you fucking say a thing about christian bale like that, or I'll kill you.
the only batman is Keaton, i tells you!

and adam west for comedyvalue
Keaton :lol:

sorry, Mr. Mom was a better actor, but he didn't look the part.
he strikes me more as the serious rich business man than Kilmer, Clooney or Bale.
kilmer was a fucking joke. well actually Schumacher fucking ruined everything by equipping Gotham City with neon lights and fluorecent makeup :icon33:

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:02 am
by mik0rs
Thought I'd drag this back up.

"How To Get Ahead in Advertising" - Anybody else seen this? Richard E. Grant plays a guy working in the advertising business who goes a bit mad and grows a boil after having trouble coming up with a campaign to advertise pimple cream. Sounds strange and it is, but it's pretty good.

7.5/10

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:04 am
by feedback
oh, I saw Batman Begins today. Christian Bale is fucking well hard and I give his rippling muscles a 10/10
the movie is brilliant too

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:35 am
by Pauly
It sure is feedback. The movie is indeed brilliant.

In fact I am gonna go see it again. KAPOW!

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:38 am
by feedback
BAM lets smoke the time-reversal pipe so we can watch it again.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:42 am
by Pauly
Although I must say that the costume still doesn't look right. He always looks as flexible as a stick.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:46 am
by feedback
I thought his sam fisher ninja type outfit was fucking slick, but batman has never really looked that cool in his fursuit anyway

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:51 am
by Pauly
Yes the problem with the suit is that it's supposed to inflict fear, as in "oh my a GIANT BAT ARGH"

but if I saw it I would be "Look at that twat dressed in a rubber bat suit. Get him!"

He should stick with the Sam Fisher outfit. Much more menacing.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:38 am
by seremtan
Just saw Mr & Mrs Smith. The first movie where I've thought "actually, Angelina Jolie really is quite hot". The whole 'men are from mars (one agency), women are from venus (the other agency)' symbolism was heavyhanded but it had its moments. I give it a 6/10.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:03 am
by Pauly
Yeah Angelina jolie doesn't do much for me. She was hot in Tomb Raider but that's about it.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:12 pm
by plained
its takes me a week or so to spec a movie :paranoid:

so now its- Nevada Smith

its a western with Steve McQueen.

so far so good :shrug:

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:21 pm
by Pauly
Sideways
Excellent film. Really good characterisation and good script. 8 out of 10

The Aviator
Average at best. Good performances, well directed but the subject matter was pretty dull. Out of all the people in history you could make a film about, Howard Hughes seems a pretty shit choice.
6 out of 10

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:23 pm
by plained
haha im still specin it :P

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:26 pm
by Don Carlos
I shall be watching house of flying daggers tonight, i shall review it later

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:59 pm
by feedback
it's predictable, everbody dies in the end

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:02 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
BATMAN!

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:38 pm
by Pext
SIN CITY - 9/10

the film is allready a classic, even before it's release

APPLESEED - 7/10

most awesome animation i've seen. it even beats ghost in the shell: innocence. the whole movie is cell shaded and totally awesome!!!
the bad thing is: the story is narrated mediocre and the characters are soooooooooooo far away from their manga sources, becoming only clichee dolls.

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:51 pm
by Duhard
King Arthur 7.5/10

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 10:27 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Duhard wrote:King Arthur 7.5/10
why don't you just rate your crap on a scale of 1 to 20.

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2005 10:35 pm
by Jackal
lol @ king arthur and the samurai knight of the round table.

Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:07 am
by sliver
Mr & Mrs Smith: C+

the film kept using devices like the counselling sessions that were obviously thought by the writer/director to be a lot cuter than they really are. It didn't make sense that Jolie's outfit was all women -- what was the point? Pitt and Jolie didn't actually gain real chemistry until the second half of the movie. There were no stand-out gunfights or car chases or anything really. I often found myself wondering what the characters were talking about. Vince Vaughn was boring -- again. And the "revelation" that thin guy from the O.C. lays out to them about their agencies' real motivation was sorely uncreative.

If it hadn't been jolie and pitt in the leads, and they hadn't actually sparked a bit in the second half, i would have given it a D.

Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:55 am
by Geebs
I only just got round to Episode III. The cutting's fucking awful, and there's no need for lizard, but it's a lot better than expected. 7/10

Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:06 am
by sliver
did you find yourself irritated by Lucas's use of every transition known to man except the star-wipe? I think around the 16th radial wipe / 400th checkerboard wipe i found myself clenching my fists every time the scene changed.

The scary thing is, i rewatched the original trilogy on dvd a few weeks ago and he did it there too, i just never really noticed before.

Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:14 am
by MKJ
sliver wrote:
The scary thing is, i rewatched the original trilogy on dvd a few weeks ago and he did it there too, i just never really noticed before.
thats the point
gives it that starwarsy feeling

thats about the only consistency between the two trilogies though

Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:09 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
Cinderella Man - 7/10