Quake 4 ingame vids and pics Update 2*

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Post Reply
netrex
Posts: 810
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 8:00 am

Post by netrex »

reallyfull wrote:Here's a pretty good vid showing off the MP against other ppl.
http://renton.uams.edu/Quakecon2k5/Quake4Multi.mp4
Sweet! Dude! :icon28: I love this game already :icon30:
[color=#DFB257][b]کΛFŦ | netrex[/b][/color] of [url=http://www.saft-clan.net/]S.A.F.T. - The Pride of [color=#FF0000]No[/color]rw[color=#0000FF]ay[/color][/url]
Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Post by Mogul »

Is that the Q3 announcer? :D

Fucking ace, fellows.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

Ok regarding tweaking 'picmip' settings, anyone remember seeing screens of Doom 3 MP or trying it out for yourself, when you lower the mip it creates a really blurry crosshair and hud. I thnk that's just a fault with the D3 engine. Even if you could lower the eye candy a whole lot online, the bluriness of the hud would prolly turn you off from doing so.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

That MP movie looks ace. What Doom 3 MP should have been. =D
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

Well, the game looks great, but the only thing left to validate is IF regular online netcode is stable. It should be a lot better than D3 at least. All the videos so far where people playing on LAN so theres no knowing for sure.
Mogul
Posts: 1635
Joined: Wed May 23, 1973 12:48 pm

Post by Mogul »

Well, I can say at least that somebody from id (probably Hollenshead, but I forget) said that since they're not going per-poly hit detection, the netcode can be "normal Quake" netcode again. This is also probably how they were able to bump up the max players to 16 (which is also confirmed).
This line only remake is total rubbish I've ever seen!!! Fuck off!!! --CZghost
Duhard
Posts: 6216
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 1999 8:00 am

Post by Duhard »

dzjepp wrote:Well, the game looks great, but the only thing left to validate is IF regular online netcode is stable. It should be a lot better than D3 at least. All the videos so far where people playing on LAN so theres no knowing for sure.
It's basically the same netcode as in q3.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

Yeah, Mogul mentioned the standard hitboxes already twice and I managed to forget again. =D

Hopefully this could mean lighter processing on the MP part? I mean even with a 'decent' rig D3 MP manages to stutter here and there.
DRuM
Posts: 6841
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by DRuM »

I wonder if we'll hear 'WELCOME TO QUAKE 4 ARENA' in a deep and masculine voice.

And hopefully:

\callvote q4dm6

:idea:
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

There's no such thing as Quake 4 Arena.

That map in the video looks fun, but I hope there are remakes.

And by remakes, I don't mean, "Add normal maps to Tokay's Towers and The Longest Yard."

I don't like what SplashDamage did to The Edge. Maybe Raven will fix their failure?
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Post by Don Carlos »

reallyfull wrote:Here's a pretty good vid showing off the MP against other ppl.
http://renton.uams.edu/Quakecon2k5/Quake4Multi.mp4
Amazing....fucking amazing..!!!
Where were you when the West was defeated?
[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/doncarlos83][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/gbar/doncarlos83.gif[/img][/url]
DRuM
Posts: 6841
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by DRuM »

What do you reckon the chances will be of being able to have enemycolors? I REALLY hope I can make my enemy bright green. Unless of course a mod such as osp needs to be created for that.
On a sidenote, I also hope there's some player models with funny taunts. I use keel both as player and enemy model, simply because I love his sounds and taunt.
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

Fuck off. Brightskins are for straight up newbs.

Team colors are fine, though. It's not like armies and sports teams don't look different in real life.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

o'dium wrote:I have to say, on watching the videos, its very, very Quake 3 like in terms of speed, weapons, what you can do, how you do it, weapon switching etc etc...

Now all i can hope for is that they have ported a few DECENT levels from past quakes like they said they would.
I'd rather have new ones. Porting we can do for ourselves.
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

rep wrote:Fuck off. Brightskins are for straight up newbs.

Team colors are fine, though. It's not like armies and sports teams don't look different in real life.
Because playing video games has some relation to being in the army!
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
User avatar
duffman91
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by duffman91 »

rep wrote:Fuck off. Brightskins are for straight up newbs.

Team colors are fine, though. It's not like armies and sports teams don't look different in real life.
I love it how you can never back up any of your claims.
User avatar
DooMer
Posts: 3067
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 1999 8:00 am

Post by DooMer »

DRuM wrote:What do you reckon the chances will be of being able to have enemycolors? I REALLY hope I can make my enemy bright green. Unless of course a mod such as osp needs to be created for that.
On a sidenote, I also hope there's some player models with funny taunts. I use keel both as player and enemy model, simply because I love his sounds and taunt.
Zero. Good luck with the picmip thing too.

Making your graphics shitty is not a good thing. It's only done because people want every possible advantage.
DRuM
Posts: 6841
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by DRuM »

DooMer wrote:
DRuM wrote:What do you reckon the chances will be of being able to have enemycolors? I REALLY hope I can make my enemy bright green. Unless of course a mod such as osp needs to be created for that.
On a sidenote, I also hope there's some player models with funny taunts. I use keel both as player and enemy model, simply because I love his sounds and taunt.
Zero. Good luck with the picmip thing too.

Making your graphics shitty is not a good thing. It's only done because people want every possible advantage.
Damn, no enemy colours, that sucks. For me, not only does that and picmip give me an advantage, but it just gets rid of clutter and a lot easier to see the pickups and the enemy. I hope the community will get around to it.
SplishSplash
Posts: 4467
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2000 8:00 am

Post by SplishSplash »

Any news on the tech requirements for Quake4?
r3t
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 9:58 am

Post by r3t »

DRuM wrote:
DooMer wrote:
DRuM wrote:What do you reckon the chances will be of being able to have enemycolors? I REALLY hope I can make my enemy bright green. Unless of course a mod such as osp needs to be created for that.
On a sidenote, I also hope there's some player models with funny taunts. I use keel both as player and enemy model, simply because I love his sounds and taunt.
Zero. Good luck with the picmip thing too.

Making your graphics shitty is not a good thing. It's only done because people want every possible advantage.
Damn, no enemy colours, that sucks. For me, not only does that and picmip give me an advantage, but it just gets rid of clutter and a lot easier to see the pickups and the enemy. I hope the community will get around to it.
There WILL be an OSP-esque mod, probably within a few weeks after release that will allow teamcolors/models and fullbright skins.
Deji
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 6:42 pm

Post by Deji »

rep wrote:Fuck off. Brightskins are for straight up newbs.
Uh huh. Working overtime to fill in for Kracus?
rep
Posts: 2910
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 7:00 am

Post by rep »

The only things I used in Quake 3 were forcemodels, simpleitems, and team models.

I didn't want to come on a server and have to deal with Orbb, Anarki, and Slash, which were often used as an advantage by the player that selected those models because they weren't as easy to read as Grunt or TankJr.

I didn't want to chase down someone in a TDM game only to find it wasn't an enemy.

I didn't want a stupid floating box cockblocking my view of someone off in the distance.

I don't think those gave me any real advantage, if you compare it all to such ridiculous commands as r_vertexlight 1, r_picmip 5, and cg_shadows 2 (rofl).

Page six crushed.
[img]http://members.cox.net/anticsensue/rep_june.gif[/img]
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

rep wrote:Fuck off. Brightskins are for straight up newbs.

Team colors are fine, though. It's not like armies and sports teams don't look different in real life.
Brightskins advance the gameplay to new heights, with respect to raw combat. Enhanced and consistent visual acquisition of target means that the actual fighting can take place at a high level.

The motorvisual system is highly involved in combat. Having it functioning at a high level means that combat will take place at a higher complexity and intensity. Think of fullbright skins as a way of optimizing the visual feedback.

The cost is that, due to equalization of lighting conditions, tactics that revolve around variable lighting conditions are no longer feasible: you can't hide in the shadows, for example.
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Post by o'dium »

I dont like bright skins, cant stand them. I think they take the skinn out of the game.

Not that it matters, i ahven't seen oen dark area in any screenshot yet, which has me worried the game wont contain any real atmosphere (SP, too, remember).
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

on the rare occasion that i play SP games, I play with as much detail as my meagre system will allow.

For multiplayer, I'm more about the combat, tactics, and strat, not atmosphere.

I prefer geometric atmosphere, or the atmosphere of the map more broadly understood.
Post Reply