I had to start teaching evolution today...

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
[xeno]Julios
Posts: 6216
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 1999 8:00 am

Post by [xeno]Julios »

Hannibal wrote:Well, I am on a mission to become an 'expert' on (modern) ID theory since this issue is now pissing me off to no end.
I believe michael behe is considered one of the primary proponents.

You might also find this page useful:

http://www.evcforum.net/

the forums are excellent, though it seems they've switched to yahoo groups
:icon27:

http://www.evcforum.net/WebPages/DiscussionBoards.html

http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/evolutionv ... gentdesign
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

God I hate people sometimes.
User avatar
GONNAFISTYA
Posts: 13369
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:20 pm

Post by GONNAFISTYA »

Don't feel bad.....Kracus hates people all the time.
Billy Bellend
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:02 pm

Post by Billy Bellend »

y'know giving this some thought(.5 sec) i see far more sighns of de'evolution in a way
Iccy (temp)
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 1:32 am

Post by Iccy (temp) »

sys0p wrote:I always thought, if evolution is a fact, how come there aren't loads of half evolved things running around? Does it not work like that?


Look around at the human race at all ? I dont know, when i look around i see many things still very unevolved or maybe a better angle is "still have much evolution to go". If you mean like goo balls with legs it probably cause this planet is well beyond its primordial evolutionary path.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

GONNAFISTYA wrote:Don't feel bad.....Kracus hates people all the time.
That's just because the people he knows are too poor or wanted by the police and can't afford to buy vacation packages from him. :(
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

BWAHAHAHAHAHAH what a load of bullshit

http://www.learnthebible.org/q_a_adaption.htm

As an aside: I know atleast 3 people who were not born with wisdom teeth. My girlfriend, my mom, and myself all had our wisdom teeth taken out so I wonder if maybe my kids wont have them. That would own. I think if we were more selective in our mating we would have evolved WAY more than we have.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

bitWISE wrote:BWAHAHAHAHAHAH what a load of bullshit

http://www.learnthebible.org/q_a_adaption.htm

As an aside: I know atleast 3 people who were not born with wisdom teeth. My girlfriend, my mom, and myself all had our wisdom teeth taken out so I wonder if maybe my kids wont have them. That would own. I think if we were more selective in our mating we would have evolved WAY more than we have.
Yes...we are seeing that happen.

I thought it would be interesting to examine the prevelance of wisdom teeth in populations that have never been introduced to modern dentistry (i.e. tribes in the deep jungle, the Brits, etc.) vs. those that have. Perhaps, and this is just a hypothesis, we might see a difference. For example, lets say that having wisdom teeth imparts some sort of selective advantage or, more likely (again, just theorizing) a selective disadvantage. Maybe having them makes you more prone to infections or something....

But in the states and other developed nations, we simply take them out...in effect negating whatever selective advantage or disadvantage they may have imparted.

This is a smaller example of something I always wanted to look into - how modern medicine is influencing our own evolution...using different populations to collect data (main problem would probaby be sample size with the real remote tribes) as well as a number of uncontrolled variables...
Billy Bellend
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:02 pm

Post by Billy Bellend »

i'm not curios about that at all.

i feel i understand so its not nessasary
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Billy Bellend wrote:i'm not curios about that at all.

i feel i understand so its not nessasary
you understand very little

but if you're happy that way, more power to you.
Billy Bellend
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:02 pm

Post by Billy Bellend »

you dont know me.

so all youve done is insult me.

and that is the least intelligent way of expressing your feelings toward the topic at hand.

there i taught some.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

I haven't insulted you in the least.

You said you feel you understand...but there was nothing to 'understand.' There was simply an idea that I thought might be interesting to pursue. You can't 'understand' what I was describing because the data that would require understanding were not presented. So, you understood very little.
Billy Bellend
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:02 pm

Post by Billy Bellend »

i cant be botherd with helping you understand.

it would take alot and your with your tone i dont think youd be very appreciative.

i mean the whole "angrey" tone .
bitWISE
Posts: 10704
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 1999 8:00 am

Post by bitWISE »

tnf wrote:
bitWISE wrote:BWAHAHAHAHAHAH what a load of bullshit

http://www.learnthebible.org/q_a_adaption.htm

As an aside: I know atleast 3 people who were not born with wisdom teeth. My girlfriend, my mom, and myself all had our wisdom teeth taken out so I wonder if maybe my kids wont have them. That would own. I think if we were more selective in our mating we would have evolved WAY more than we have.
Yes...we are seeing that happen.

I thought it would be interesting to examine the prevelance of wisdom teeth in populations that have never been introduced to modern dentistry (i.e. tribes in the deep jungle, the Brits, etc.) vs. those that have. Perhaps, and this is just a hypothesis, we might see a difference. For example, lets say that having wisdom teeth imparts some sort of selective advantage or, more likely (again, just theorizing) a selective disadvantage. Maybe having them makes you more prone to infections or something....

But in the states and other developed nations, we simply take them out...in effect negating whatever selective advantage or disadvantage they may have imparted.

This is a smaller example of something I always wanted to look into - how modern medicine is influencing our own evolution...using different populations to collect data (main problem would probaby be sample size with the real remote tribes) as well as a number of uncontrolled variables...
Mine actually do need taken out. They are titled and covered by my gums partially. The centers are beginning to decay since I can't brush them so its either fill teeth that I don't room for or remove them.
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Post by tnf »

Billy Bellend wrote:i cant be botherd with helping you understand.

it would take alot and your with your tone i dont think youd be very appreciative.

i mean the whole "angrey" tone .
Is your other name 'pete'? :lol:

Don't worry, either. I'm not "angrey," I understand completely, and I appreciate you taking the time to respond.
R00k
Posts: 15188
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:00 am

Post by R00k »

Billy Bellend wrote:i cant be botherd with helping you understand.

it would take alot and your with your tone i dont think youd be very appreciative.

i mean the whole "angrey" tone .
No reason to antagonize tnf there buddy.
Billy Bellend
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 6:02 pm

Post by Billy Bellend »

heh no

pete is def his ownself far as i know .



hehe rook

jus putting in some posts is all
Post Reply