Quake3World

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:25 pm**

eh

what part ?

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:29 pm**

Dave wrote:

Not HDR.

Crap++

2/10

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:31 pm**

It's funny I've posted a number of non-HDR photos on flickr which don't look like HDR's and still some morons keep thinking they are HDR images.

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:31 pm**

plained wrote:eh

what part ?

the part when you said have your ever seen something your eyes can't see.

don't talk to me about colour moron, there isn't anything i don't know about it.

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:41 pm**

FanaticX wrote:
Dave wrote:
Not HDR.

Crap++

2/10

Don't make me ignore you sir for your hurtful comments :icon23:

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:45 pm**

Doombrain wrote:
plained wrote:eh

what part ?
the part when you said have your ever seen something your eyes can't see.

don't talk to me about colour moron, there isn't anything i don't know about it.

well i was mostly refering too contrast

and with contrast processing a cam can see more than an eye in certain conditions

sony done it to vid for years and years b4 digi cams

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:58 pm**

plained wrote:
Doombrain wrote:
plained wrote:eh

what part ?
the part when you said have your ever seen something your eyes can't see.

don't talk to me about colour moron, there isn't anything i don't know about it.
well i was mostly refering too contrast

and with contrast processing a cam can see more than an eye in certain conditions

sony done it to vid for years and years b4 digi cams

lol, just, no. Rendering and D-max on any input CCD/CMOS can't be outside of the visual spectrum otherwise it becomes a UV input device, even then you’d need a UV light source.
Nice try though, idiot.

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:02 pm**

ok so you have no idea whats old for vid cams

so it makes sense youre in the imageing bidness

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:13 pm**

dave, edit. thanks.

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:51 pm**

holy shit aperture owns, hard.

anyone have any tips on batch, tweaking etc?

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:08 pm**

It's nice, but watch it slow down as you start loading it up with raws or tiffs.. My Mac with 4 gigs of ram swaps like mad. Maybe it would be better if I put my db on another drive it would be faster.

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:34 pm**

how the fuck do do i batch stuff?

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:54 pm**

The lift and stamp tools. Lift the settings from the master photo with the lift tool, change the drop down list on the lift and stamp window from replace to add (so you don't remove settings you don't want removed), remove the settings you don't want applied, change back to the selection tool, choose all the images you want to change, click the stamp tool again, click apply to selected at the bottom of the lift and stamp window, rinse and repeat.

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:13 pm**

thanks.

Posted: **Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:02 pm**

OK, stacking works better

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:58 pm**

Dave wrote: Don't make me ignore you sir for your hurtful comments :icon23:

You want real hurtful comments, post them on photo.net and you might just get some. I learned some good lessons from a few real photogs who took the time to really rip apart my photo(s) and pointed out how flawed and crappy they were. This was two or three years ago when I thought my photos were decent. LOL

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:03 pm**

I've just bagged myself a Pro3800 with 3 sets of carts for nothing

Girlfriend's going to kill me.

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:49 pm**

Hey I was checking out that printer too. Was planning on getting one when I got home. $1500CDN ++ price tag didn't bother much since I can sell prints and make that money back real fast.

What paper do you recommend?

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:34 pm**

I think it mostly depends on what kind of look you want your prints to have. Even though I just got a Canon printer, I'm going to keep using Epson media. I like the enhanced matte/premium presentation matte and their luster. I've never tried playing with any fine art media though

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:26 pm**

FanaticX wrote:Hey I was checking out that printer too. Was planning on getting one when I got home. $1500CDN ++ price tag didn't bother much since I can sell prints and make that money back real fast.

What paper do you recommend?

what you looking for, matte or gloss?

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:57 pm**

getting there. be good if i could knock some areas out in PS

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:32 pm**

saturn wrote:
Doombrain wrote:right, so who's with flickr?
FX, you, me (http://www.flickr.com/photos/quanle), macabre.......more?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/recorddelahora/

what's FX's profile?

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:40 pm**

bit better

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:42 pm**

prince1000 wrote:
saturn wrote:
Doombrain wrote:right, so who's with flickr?
FX, you, me (http://www.flickr.com/photos/quanle), macabre.......more?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/recorddelahora/

what's FX's profile?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bhophoto/

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:55 pm**

Doombrain wrote:
what you looking for, matte or gloss?

Matte and luster. What's the life span of the cartridge? I haven't done enough research as of yet.

Quake3World

PHOTOS PLEASE