Page 9 of 11
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 4:52 am
by prince1000
where's my location?

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:53 am
by MKJ
make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:51 am
by Mat Linnett
Any chance of the "Copy" function from the old Q3W that copied the URL of a particular post?
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:46 am
by Turbanator
MKJ wrote:make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..

that's todo with your browser, not the board...
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:51 am
by MKJ
Turbanator wrote:MKJ wrote:make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..

that's todo with your browser, not the board...
:E i havent changed browsers, only boards

q3w didnt have this problem before either btw, nor did raw-one..
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:21 pm
by Turbanator
MKJ wrote:Turbanator wrote:MKJ wrote:make it so that when you press back, the post reply/quickbox input field isnt cleared?
especially handy when the board tells you yer trying to flood..

that's todo with your browser, not the board...
:E i havent changed browsers, only boards

q3w didnt have this problem before either btw, nor did raw-one..
well, if i post this, and click back on the next screen, everything is still there for me..
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:36 pm
by MKJ
lemme test
[edit] nope, no dice :E how odd[/edit]
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:16 am
by Eraser
New Yahoo! Messenger icon. The old one didn't have a transparent background (on the dark post background you can see it's not transparant):

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:23 am
by Nightshade
Can we set the "Include Signature" checkbox to unchecked as default?
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:25 am
by U4EA
You can do that in your profile.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:49 pm
by SplishSplash
Someone try clicking the "WoW questions" thread.
It seems there are two "General Discussion" links at the top right. It's not a problem, just thought it might interest Turbie or whoever's hacking away at these boards.
Edit: Gone now, nevermind.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 1:17 pm
by MKJ
stop being on crack
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 1:25 pm
by SplishSplash
I can hear the forums in my dreams.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:13 pm
by Transient
"If you build it, they will come."
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:11 pm
by Fender
The Yahoo icon does not have a transparent background.

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:27 pm
by R00k
Look 7 posts up.

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:10 pm
by Turbanator
if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.
<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:06 am
by saturn
I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?

Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 7:01 am
by glossy
Turbanator wrote:if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.
<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:04 am
by Turbanator
saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?

I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:05 am
by Turbanator
glossy wrote:Turbanator wrote:if someone can be bothered, the msn, icq, aim and Y! icons all need remaking.
<img src="http://web.icq.com/whitepages/online?icq=16398296&img=5"><img src="http://www.quake3world.com/ubb/icq_text.gif">
remade how? do they need transparent background only, or do you actually want something remade ?
they need the text next to them, and some of them need to be smaller so it all blends together.
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:13 am
by U4EA
Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:34 pm
by Turbanator
U4EA wrote:Why does q3w insist on using only 90% of the page width?
because we can?
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 12:55 pm
by glossy
q3w is a rebel without a cause
rock on!
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:43 pm
by U4EA
Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.