Quake3World

Turbanator wrote:

saturn wrote:I just noticed that the lettertype of topics is in bold, it looks a bit cluttered IMO. What if this is changed?

I was thinking about this last night, should we put the topic titles back to unbold (as in ubb q3w)... and what about underlines... underlines look cluttered imho....

no bold and underlines

U4EA wrote:Wasted space innit? We could be using 96% or 98% instead and still have a decent amount of padding.

omfg!lol!rofl!lmao! UR right, U4EALOLRFLOLMAO! that extra 6% is going to waste!!! Fuck me, there are starving children in Mexico (ie. bliusca) who have NO forum whatsoever and like ravenous internet gluttons we're simply tossing unused forum away! your post is neither petty nor does it in any way make you out to be a whining trifling nerd!! :upupupupupupupupupupupupup:

kekeke ?

[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/1.jpg[/lvlshot]
[lvlshot]http://www.quake3world.com/turb/forum/2.jpg[/lvlshot]

I like the font in #2, but no underline.

Please, for the love of moses sandals, turn on the HTML in posts.

Underlined looks good.

Fender wrote:I like the font in #2, but no underline.

Same. :icon14:

center is a depricated tag :E

but yea

riddla wrote:Here's the list of completely safe HTML tags I have allowed on my phpbb boards:

b,i,u,p,pre,blockquote,br,strong,ul,ol,li,H1,H2,H3,H4,tt

"completely safe" is a bit of a overconfidant place to be.

by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)

Fender wrote:I like the font in #2, but no underline.

a.k.a. classic q3w

glossy wrote:by the way, i would heavily suggest rewriting the "allowed html" checking code, it's shitty with stock ubb (for example, you can't do <tag attribute="value">, it'll be blocked/disallowed -- only straight <tag> works. this means no <bgsound src="">/<iframe src="">/<img src=""> stuff if you wanted it)

I just did an <img src="" width=blah> right here .. presumably, it's working .. ?!

assuming yer still working on the css, i wont say anything about the colordifference between a new and visited link being too subtle

that sentence doesnt make any sense but you know what i mean :A

hows that?

:icon14: thats what im talking about
booya

Ok, maybe I'm the only one experiencing this, but:

The "New Reply" arrows don't work correctly (at least not all the time).
Links that I've visited appear as unvisited. This is the only site where I have this problem.

There was a thread moved from GD to Fix. I posted in it in Fix and the posts showed up in the same thread in GD.

http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=712

Well shit, nm then. Just assumed I was still in GD.

Don't know if it's been mentioned, but could either the quick reply box or the "Post Topic | Post Reply" buttons be moved away from eachother?
The amount of times I've entered a reply in quickly reply only to press the "Post Reply" button above and lose the post is rather irritating...

SplishSplash wrote:Ok, maybe I'm the only one experiencing this, but:

The "New Reply" arrows don't work correctly (at least not all the time).
Links that I've visited appear as unvisited. This is the only site where I have this problem.

This still stands btw. Deleting the cookies didn't help shit, or at least not permanently.

might want to think about adding a memberlist link again. maybe a link to the avatar gallery as well.

sorry about all that, upgrading to the latest version.

quite annoying

Turbanator wrote:sorry about all that, upgrading to the latest version.

I was wondering if that was the case when I clicked the phpBB link while Q3W was down

the forum code is so modified already that the update was a little more than tricky to perform. Seems to have worked though.... *shrug*