Page 98 of 284

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 9:31 pm
by tnf
I'm saving all these pics you people take and putting them into my 'pics I've taken on my world travels' folder to show to people. Thanks for the contributions. I may need to be PS'd into a couple of them to make it more believable.

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 9:33 pm
by saturn
I'm kinda fond of this one. The moon was reflecting on a small spot in the river. Small aperture f/16 and 170 secs exposure at 300mm.

Image

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:25 pm
by Dave
eeeeeeenteresting.

Does your battery die quickly with long exposure saturn? old nikons (like really old) used to use a lot of power keeping the shutter open, but I don't know if the newer ones do. My xpan drains in a hurry on a long exposure, which is why I've never tried it.

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:36 pm
by saturn
I was shooting for 2 hours during the night....many very long exposures (>2 minutes).....I think the battery was half-empty, not really sure. It got colder and that might have influenced the charge.

My D50 is quite economically with the Li-Ion battery. I can do 1000-2000 shots without using flash. Less of course if flash is used.

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 10:44 pm
by Dave
It's not a battery thing.. I know my Canon's use a magnet to keep the shutter open, but some cams use electricity. I wasn't sure if Nikon changed their shutter mechanism. I think an article I read was talking about old film units.

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 11:04 pm
by saturn
I'm not sure either about the mirror lock-up technology. Only that I don't have true MLU prior to shooting :)

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:55 am
by Dave
You Nikon queers (fx, sat, dmmh) need to get one of these so you can make pics like these without photoshopping them with the lens blur.

Image

Image

Ken will tell you to use a 4x5, but then you have to start shooting film and buy a whole bunch of shit that weighs a ton.

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:08 pm
by saturn
ooh....tilt-shift lenses......funky photos :D

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:10 pm
by dmmh
Dave wrote:You Nikon queers (fx, sat, dmmh) need to get one of these so you can make pics like these without photoshopping them with the lens blur.

Image

Image

Ken will tell you to use a 4x5, but then you have to start shooting film and buy a whole bunch of shit that weighs a ton.
ive been looking into one of the PC lenses. You can get older ones for about $200 on ebay. Cool for architecture photography and stuff.

One major plus of the D40 over all other Nikon DSLR's is it will fit any F mount lenses, where the rest needs AI lenses. Fun shopping for second hand lenses :D

Took this one with a non-AI 50mm f/1.4 Nikkon-S Auto @ 1.4 couple of days ago...nothing special, like it though

Image

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:59 pm
by dmmh
so dave...are those Hasselblad to Nikon F mount adapters any good? :)

http://cgi.ebay.nl/Adapter-HASSELBLAD-a ... dZViewItem

any special, not insanely expensive lenses you can recommend? :)

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:01 pm
by Doombrain
oh god, don't do it

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:06 pm
by dmmh
wont do much good I think though, using medium format lenses on 35mm aight? ;)

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:07 pm
by dmmh
Doombrain wrote:oh god, don't do it
lol, that's what I reckoned ;)

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:09 pm
by Tsakali_
that peripheral blur effect is poor quality, nothing you could,'t duplicate with photoshop, I am starting to appreciate the quality of lens related effects, because they seem to come off as very natural, but this one is an exception :icon13:

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:23 pm
by Dave
You can't duplicate real tilt blur with photoshop... I did those above in PS and they look like shit. You also get the added (or main) benefit of being able to correct converging lines.

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:24 pm
by Dave
dmmh wrote:wont do much good I think though, using medium format lenses on 35mm aight? ;)
If I recall, MF lenses aren't designed as sharp as your average 35mm because the sheer size of the MF negative negates the need for an ultra sharp lens, so putting one on a 35 might not give you what you expect. That might all be bullshit, though

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:31 pm
by Doombrain
dmmh, you're probably better off looking for a cheap rangefinder if it's that kind of lens you're looking for.

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:40 pm
by Dave
Or an actual medium format cam with a 50 or 80mm lens

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:47 pm
by dmmh
Doombrain wrote:dmmh, you're probably better off looking for a cheap rangefinder if it's that kind of lens you're looking for.
nah, I'm just struck by lens fever and looking into what will fit and what not :)

Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:49 pm
by Doombrain
you need to be careful with that, it can fuck your camera up.

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:37 am
by l0g1c
Dave wrote:You Nikon queers (fx, sat, dmmh) need to get one of these so you can make pics like these without photoshopping them with the lens blur.
Or you could get a lensbaby.

http://lensbabies.com/

Dave, you should check out the miniature fake tilt-shifts group in flickr.

http://www.flickr.com/groups/tilt-shift-fakes/

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 4:13 am
by dmmh
Doombrain wrote:you need to be careful with that, it can fuck your camera up.
I know :)
all F mount Nikon fit mine though, so it's ok.

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:29 pm
by l0g1c
Scanned one on my way out today.

Image

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:35 pm
by MaCaBr3
Posting this from Sweden - Stockholm, staying at a mate's place for a couple of days:

Image

Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:36 pm
by Doombrain
i like that, i'd just play with the tonal range a bit if it was me.