Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:23 pm
by YourGrandpa
reefsurfer wrote:You can go as high as 25ms on a tft/lcd without loosing anything in picture/frames... i've tried a few...im using 14ms now and i cant see any differance from 2 friends that have 8ms and 12ms..
Dont stare yourself blind on the ms response shit.
I'm sure if you spent some time looking at an 8ms LCD(like a few weeks), then went back to a 25, you'd notice.
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:41 pm
by equivo
I do everything on my ancient Samsung 151bm. Never had an issue with gaming, I don't see what all the fuss is about.
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:48 pm
by Psyche911
[rep]
OLED > *
[/rep]
Seriously though, I'm sticking with this CRT until I see what pans out with the intro of OLEDs.
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:56 pm
by Zyte
I'm very content with my IIyama ProLite E431S. 8ms i think.
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 7:48 am
by MaCaBr3
While I do like my 19" 16ms HP monitor, I can't aim shit in Quake 3 :/
But on the other hand, I don't game that often anymore, so i'm content.
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 3:37 pm
by KingManULTRA
I won't have a lot of space when I go to college and so I need an LCD one way or another.
btw, still looking at this monitor:
http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/Fee ... 6824001185
One review says:
No DVI
No digital input so you're not going to be getting the claimed 8ms of response time....more like around 15-30 depending on the application...sorry guys there's a reason it's so cheap.
Translation?
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 3:48 pm
by Grudge
No DVI = fucking stupid
Why make a digital device with only analog input? It makes no sense.