What sort of computer does one require to play HDTV?

User avatar
Foo
Posts: 13840
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2000 7:00 am
Location: New Zealand

Post by Foo »

So have you guys determined whether it's the streaming that's causing the problem, or whether it happens even playing hi-def from your hard drive?
"Maybe you have some bird ideas. Maybe that’s the best you can do."
― Terry A. Davis
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

ToxicBug wrote:I can view 480p, but its not silky smooth. Therefore I don't feel like watching it, unless its absolutely perfectly smooth. For some people it would be perfectly watcheable though.
ok, but you know how i am with video/audio and streaming 480p didn't bother me one bit.

Foo, i just reformatted last week and i do have a copy of Step Into Liquid in hi-def, but i don't have anything on my hdd. I'll need to update WMP (since i never use it) but i'll check it out and post my results.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta ... laylang=en

There Microsoft recommends a 2.4GHz cpu to play these. They do definately slow-down on lower spec machines, even if you have them saved on a hard disk.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

dzjepp wrote:http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=abde1e02-b529-469e-ae6a-7417fcde9e12&displaylang=en

There Microsoft recommends a 2.4GHz cpu to play these. They do definately slow-down on lower spec machines, even if you have them saved on a hard disk.
yeah, they're referring to 720p and >

this is why i have no problems with 480p on my machine ;o
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Post by Massive Quasars »

What specs are required for playing 1080i video?
[url=http://www.marxists.org/][img]http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/3050/avatarmy7.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1736/leninzbp5.gif[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/1076/modulestalinat6.jpg[/img][img]http://img506.imageshack.us/img506/9239/cheds1.jpg[/img][/url]
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

The newest generation of GPUs should really help, as they accelerate decoding of formats like H.264. At least the hardware supports it currently, but not the drivers (for ATi, I'm not sure about nVidia).
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

I wasn't aware of this before, but the new QT7 apparently lets you save streams for watching later? That is kewl. QT Alrernative has been updated today with QT7 (and the Mega Codec Pack prolly tommorow or in a few days).

Toxic, don't know why you can't save these streams, but if you where able to, then you should be able to try the tip I posted, the alternative way of playing the HD .mov clips, it might work faster on your machine.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Massive Quasars wrote:What specs are required for playing 1080i video?
MS says:

Optimum Configuration
(to play 1080p video with 5.1 surround sound)
# Windows XP
# Windows Media Player 10
# DirectX 9.0
# 3.0 GHz processor or equivalent
# 512 MB of RAM
# 128 MB video card
# 1920 x 1440 screen resolution
# 24-bit 96 kHz multichannel sound card
# 5.1 surround sound speaker system

hey Toxic (or anyone), try this page at Microsoft.com that has 720p and 1080i downloadable clips

bink
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Toxic, here are Apple's recommendations for both MAC and Windows.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Thanks :lub:
Psyche911
Posts: 1742
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Psyche911 »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:Toxic, here are Apple's recommendations for both MAC and Windows.
:olo:
I can only do 480p.
Guest

Post by Guest »

Psyche911 wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:Toxic, here are Apple's recommendations for both MAC and Windows.
:olo:
I can only do 480p.
I can barely do 480p. ffs
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

i run em fine. loller.
dzjepp
Posts: 12839
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2001 8:00 am

Post by dzjepp »

So this codec is processor dependant then?
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

ToxicBug wrote:Thanks :lub:
=o
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

dzjepp wrote:So this codec is processor dependant then?
Well, unless your graphics card supplies hardware h.264 support.
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

Grudge wrote:
dzjepp wrote:So this codec is processor dependant then?
Well, unless your graphics card supplies hardware h.264 support.
what's that got to do with hi-def? am i that tired that i am confusing this?
Grudge
Posts: 8587
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 8:00 am

Post by Grudge »

+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
Grudge wrote:
dzjepp wrote:So this codec is processor dependant then?
Well, unless your graphics card supplies hardware h.264 support.
what's that got to do with hi-def? am i that tired that i am confusing this?
Isn't the h.264 the preferred codec for broadcasted HD content?
+JuggerNaut+
Posts: 22175
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 7:00 am

Post by +JuggerNaut+ »

i've not heard anything about it being "preferred" for broadcasting, but that could very well be. for Blu-Ray though, it's one of three. the other two are MPEG-4 AVC High Profile (previously called FRExt) and Microsoft's VC-1 video codec (the proposed SMPTE standard based on WMV9), which are mandatory.
Locked