Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:35 am
they've had the standalone since forever.
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:02 pm
fkn
yer nice red X
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:05 pm
hello sir,saturn wrote:new iPods/nano's/shuffle are out too
hows you?
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:08 pm
You mean a version of the thing I mentioned a month or two ago that someone said would probably never see the light of day? :icon26:Canis wrote:I'm looking forward to the "iTV" set-top device. They mentioned it today, and there are rumored product images on the web. It should be an interesting device. I hope it'll do things I'll find useful.
I fucking called that one.
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:14 pm
I doubt it's gonna be called iTV because ITV was a television network here in the UK, and though they don't broadcast anymore I would wager the trademark is still held.
I realise it's just a working/rumoured title, just saying don't get used to it...
I realise it's just a working/rumoured title, just saying don't get used to it...
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 1:20 pm
Apple showed this thing, it's real...Foo wrote:I doubt it's gonna be called iTV because ITV was a television network here in the UK, and though they don't broadcast anymore I would wager the trademark is still held.
I realise it's just a working/rumoured title, just saying don't get used to it...
Oh and here's where I called it
http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22981
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:43 pm
Hah!Dave wrote:You mean a version of the thing I mentioned a month or two ago that someone said would probably never see the light of day? :icon26:Canis wrote:I'm looking forward to the "iTV" set-top device. They mentioned it today, and there are rumored product images on the web. It should be an interesting device. I hope it'll do things I'll find useful.
I fucking called that one.
I was wrong, ok. I figured it would be a Mac Mini, and to be honest, I dont see why they didnt go that route. Maybe for the sake of keeping the price down?Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:24 pm
Does that mean I should charge my iPod Video I haven't used in 3 months?
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:29 pm
my iPod Mini is all but dead.
For whatever reason it started acting funky out of the blue.
Discharges even when not in use.
So, if I take it off my charger and immediately start listening all is well but
if I wait until the end of the day with the iPod not in use, the battery will be dead - or so the iPod says.
I stuck it back in the charger and not 5 seconds goes by when it says "Charged."
I'm thinking bad software now >>
For whatever reason it started acting funky out of the blue.
Discharges even when not in use.
So, if I take it off my charger and immediately start listening all is well but
if I wait until the end of the day with the iPod not in use, the battery will be dead - or so the iPod says.
I stuck it back in the charger and not 5 seconds goes by when it says "Charged."
I'm thinking bad software now >>
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:38 pm
Assuming they only make minor changes between .1 upgrades they could just use a patch system which takes the difference between the two exes etc and merges them. It would be pretty tiny.Canis wrote:Yeah, I was just clarifying that this was a full version update as opposed to an incremental one, but I do agree with that. For what the incremental updates are, ~40MB seems a bit much. Still, the program file itself is ~20MB, so that's going to be at least the size of the download.
It's still known as ITV isn't it?Foo wrote:I doubt it's gonna be called iTV because ITV was a television network here in the UK, and though they don't broadcast anymore I would wager the trademark is still held.
I realise it's just a working/rumoured title, just saying don't get used to it...
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:46 pm
They mentioned "iTV" as an interim codename.
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:25 pm
Well I got a tip from my friend on how to stop iTunes from recreating an iTunes folder in the All Programs part of the Start Menu. Delete all the shortcuts created by iTunes and create new shortcuts that lead to the iTunes program, usually C:\Program Files\iTunes\iTunes.exe. I am glad that the fix exists, because I would have uninstalled iTunes 7 and reinstalled iTunes 6 otherwise.
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:49 pm
nano pr0n!
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:50 pm
Ooohhh Seckseh!!!
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:50 pm
life's good, life's busybusetibi wrote:hello sir,saturn wrote:new iPods/nano's/shuffle are out too
hows you?
how's you mate?
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 7:51 pm
saturn wrote:nano pr0n!
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:14 pm
Anyone played around with the Retrieve Album Art option?
It's a half-ass implement if you ask me.. Now I realize you need proper tags, but it seems to be random when it does and doesn't work, even though 1) I keep proper tags, 2) the album art IS on iTunes. Or songs on the same album are listed seperately, even though I specify that they are part of the same compilation... anyone else have trouble with this?
It's a half-ass implement if you ask me.. Now I realize you need proper tags, but it seems to be random when it does and doesn't work, even though 1) I keep proper tags, 2) the album art IS on iTunes. Or songs on the same album are listed seperately, even though I specify that they are part of the same compilation... anyone else have trouble with this?
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:26 pm
[quote="saturn"][/quote]
hey look, the backsides of what i already posted.
OH I GET IT. BACKSIDES.
hey look, the backsides of what i already posted.
OH I GET IT. BACKSIDES.
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:32 pm
it's a much nicer pic you ol' cynic bastard
CREATIVE ROCKS!
CREATIVE ROCKS!
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:34 am
Yeah, I've noticed the randomness, but when it does work the album art stays, so sooner or later it'll fill your library with the proper artwork.Wizard .3 wrote:Anyone played around with the Retrieve Album Art option?
It's a half-ass implement if you ask me.. Now I realize you need proper tags, but it seems to be random when it does and doesn't work, even though 1) I keep proper tags, 2) the album art IS on iTunes. Or songs on the same album are listed seperately, even though I specify that they are part of the same compilation... anyone else have trouble with this?
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 2:59 am
New itunes:
gapless
fucking
playback.
finally. Foobar's had it forever, and they wait until just now to make it with itunes? wtf.
I hope it'll work with my older video ipod.
gapless
fucking
playback.
finally. Foobar's had it forever, and they wait until just now to make it with itunes? wtf.
I hope it'll work with my older video ipod.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:22 pm
Do anyone using this on WinXP haver problems with the alt-arrow key command for skipping albums? The key command doesnt work at all for me.
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:09 pm
The album art feature and view are excellent ideas except that I've run it a half a dozen time and it still hasn't found all of the album art (and all of the MP3s are fully tagged).
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:30 pm
Ya, I guess it isn't just me. Can't complain too much though, cause it's a great feature which will hopefully have the bugs eliminated in future releases.Tormentius wrote:The album art feature and view are excellent ideas except that I've run it a half a dozen time and it still hasn't found all of the album art (and all of the MP3s are fully tagged).
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 6:45 pm
If the albums are not on the iTunes music store they may not have the artwork available. Not sure how it works though. I've also noticed the artist and album names have to be right for it to retrieve the proper artwork. I've had stuff like "Disc 2" vs "Disc II" give me problems with retrieving the artwork.