Quake3World

shaft wrote:Everyone thought D3 sucked becasue the MP wasnt like Q3, same with Q4...everyone just wanted Q3 all over again...more of the same.

i thought D3 sucked because the SP was pants. same with Q4. plus i wasn't impressed with the game engine

SOAPboy wrote:
Infinity Ward didnt make it. There working on a PC title.. Guess thats the word on the street anyways.

umm..yea Cpt. obvious.. he dident ask that, he asked why CoD 3 dident come to pc.. not who is making the next cod.

iluvquake4 wrote:Did they give any reason for not making a PC version?

Because Gray Matter was folded into Treyarch, which does console-only development, we had 5 platforms to make it on, 2 of them old-gen, and less than a year of solid development time to do it in. IW had 2+ years for 2 platforms and neither of them had the limitations of the PS2.

reefsurfer wrote:

SOAPboy wrote:
Infinity Ward didnt make it. There working on a PC title.. Guess thats the word on the street anyways.

umm..yea Cpt. obvious.. he dident ask that, he asked why CoD 3 dident come to pc.. not who is making the next cod.

Thats why. Because a PC TITLE IS SLATED ALREADY FROM INFINITY WARD.

Back to bowling you fucking idiot.

SOAPboy wrote:

reefsurfer wrote:

iluvquake4 wrote:Did they give any reason for not making a PC version?

Not that i know... guess pc is so last year?
Alot of games are coming for the consoles firts/or exclusive... why is beyond my knowledge.

All i know is that im drooling for gears and vegas.

Guess thats the word on the street anyways.

You must hang out on Pasty Nerd Street.

Nightshade wrote:

SOAPboy wrote:

reefsurfer wrote: Not that i know... guess pc is so last year?
Alot of games are coming for the consoles firts/or exclusive... why is beyond my knowledge.

All i know is that im drooling for gears and vegas.

Guess thats the word on the street anyways.

You must hang out on Pasty Nerd Street.

Yea, he does, and i do to... Got beef?

*trys to look for the "Street Brawlin, CUNT" pic*
Damnit!

How many players does CoD3 online support on the PS2?

Massive Quasars wrote:How many players does CoD3 online support on the PS2?

I don't think I'd want to even try playing it online with the PS2

how would it be different from any other console?

MKJ wrote:how would it be different from any other console?

Let me guess... You never played wit hthe PS2 online, have you?

Think of playing Quake 3, with a 700ping, and then your half way there.

And thats on the decent servers.

And thats once you get into a game, after five hours of trying to get it all working.

i have actually, and apart from the crappy (or actually, non existant) masterserver theres really nothing different.
that is, the service sucks but the games are still the same

and thus, the PS2 loses all online credibility

eepberries wrote:

Massive Quasars wrote:How many players does CoD3 online support on the PS2?

I don't think I'd want to even try playing it online with the PS2

Thanks, but that's not answering my question moron.

o'dium wrote:Let me guess... You never played wit hthe PS2 online, have you?

Think of playing Quake 3, with a 700ping, and then your half way there.

And thats on the decent servers.

And thats once you get into a game, after five hours of trying to get it all working.

Yeah the PS2's online functionality was a let down when compared to the Xbox. Now how about that question I brought up?

Massive Quasars wrote:

eepberries wrote:

Massive Quasars wrote:How many players does CoD3 online support on the PS2?

I don't think I'd want to even try playing it online with the PS2

Thanks, but that's not answering my question moron.

16

ty.

o'dium wrote:

MKJ wrote:how would it be different from any other console?

Let me guess... You never played wit hthe PS2 online, have you?

Think of playing Quake 3, with a 700ping, and then your half way there.

And thats on the decent servers.

And thats once you get into a game, after five hours of trying to get it all working.

he speaks the truth. it is absolutely pathetic (compared to xblive)

seremtan wrote:BF1942 = YourSargepa
BF Vietnam = DaNangpa
BF2 = YourQuagpa
BF2142 = Robopa

robopa HAHAHA

Massive Quasars wrote:

eepberries wrote:

Massive Quasars wrote:How many players does CoD3 online support on the PS2?

I don't think I'd want to even try playing it online with the PS2

Thanks, but that's not answering my question moron.

Fucking cunt, Google :icon10:

I don't care for too many WW2 shooters.

I wish COD2 was a bit more open in the maps - i.e. my guy is some hardcore soldier who can't jump a 2 foot fence? Shit like that bugs me when a game is trying to really immerse you in the action in a slightly more realistic fashion. COD2 just felt a bit on rails in some of the missions, not all. Some of it was great though. Brothers in Arms kind of ruined me for anymore ww2 games...that overhyped piece of crap made you really appreciate good squad AI, because it certainly didn't have it.

How many more WW2 games will there be you think?

tnf wrote:
How many more WW2 games will there be you think?

Saving Private Ryan: The game

I like how the Soviet Vasili Koslov character in CoD2 is based on Vasili Zaitsev, the legendary sniper in the Red Army.

so COD3 online really fuking sucks ..

single player is reasonably distracting and looks very nice ..

movement is clumsy as hell - maps FULL of sticky points ..

on the whole is usual arcade bs shooter - its just about ok tbh

I got bored with the WW2 theme once the third bloody Medal of Honor expansion got announced, and that was before anyone had even heard of Call of Duty.

cod:uo is a brilliant mp shooter, everything after that is fluff.