Page 2 of 4
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:23 pm
by Eraser
hax103 wrote:
Just look at "repeat offenders" - these guys
clearly don't learn the first or second or third time...
Well I'm strictly talking about people that are first time offenders obviously. Maybe facing a judge is indeed something the guy needs, but don't push him into the courtroom facing the theoretical possibility of 10 years in jail.
I also find it interesting to see how some people refer to this incident as "drugging others" while other people refer to it as "a prank gone wrong". There's quite a different mental approach to drugging others and pranking others.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:26 pm
by plained
blood came outta thier asses ffs
fuckin tricked and poisoned and who knows what internal damage
fuck that idiot and his idiot parents
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:28 pm
by MKJ
this is a traumatic event for plained. too close to home perhaps ?
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:29 pm
by plained
are you daft?
if blood come outta ur ass cuz some idiot thought id be funny to fuc you up
yould be all "fuck was that funny thanks"
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
by MKJ
definitely struck a nerve there, eraser
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:31 pm
by plained
paint my opinion any way you want.
that wasnt comedy what he did
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:44 pm
by +JuggerNaut+
hax103 wrote:I don't think he should serve jail time, but I do think that a kid
who would drug others does need a reality check and that
check could come in the form of facing a judge in a courtroom
and being let off with some community service and apologies.
I know alot of highschoolers who really don't get the ramifications
of their actions, regardless of whether its playing nasty
pranks or even stealing. The world is their playpen and they
just keep doing it.
Just look at "repeat offenders" - these guys
clearly don't learn the first or second or third time...
yes
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:45 pm
by plained
MKJ wrote: definitely struck a nerve there, eraser
actually i was thinking that about the people defending him.
why would someone defend that.
thats is a struck nerve
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:51 pm
by R00k
plained wrote:MKJ wrote: definitely struck a nerve there, eraser
actually i was thinking that about the people defending him.
why would someone defend that.
thats is a struck nerve
Nobody's defending him. Personally, I'm just saying the charges are overkill.
But, as tnf said, it sounds like that was the only appropriate statute under the circumstances.
Maybe there should be a separate legal statute for pranks gone wrong, with sentencing dependent on the severity of the outcome - and some kind of procedure to scare the hell out of the kid and let him know that irresponsible acts toward others can be serious business.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:58 pm
by plained
there is directions and warnings on that shit.
if its fine for you to accept getting tricked into poisioning
thats just great for you.
not me tho, fuck them and thier parents.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:04 pm
by plained
btw you people are very nieve
fucking haters will kill you and laugh and say
"oh whoops i was pranking so i dont have to take responsability"
yay
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:18 pm
by MKJ
i think a prank gone wrong is what got plained in his wheelchair
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:27 pm
by plained
eh
you dont think so good when it comes to me.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:30 pm
by R00k
plained wrote:btw you people are very nieve
fucking haters will kill you and laugh and say
"oh whoops i was pranking so i dont have to take responsability"
yay
So every time there really is a prank gone wrong, we should assume the worst and that the kid was intentionally trying to harm people, and lock him up?
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:33 pm
by Tsakali_
that would be pretty reasonable for some pricks out there, but not for this one, and definately not for such a long term
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:35 pm
by plained
R00k wrote:plained wrote:btw you people are very nieve
fucking haters will kill you and laugh and say
"oh whoops i was pranking so i dont have to take responsability"
yay
So every time there really is a prank gone wrong, we should assume the worst and that the kid was intentionally trying to harm people, and lock him up?
you cant read comprehend for reals ey?
a prank is harmless, like a squirting lapel flower.
when someone deliberatly prepares a drug wayyy over recomended doses and hides it in food and gives it to unsuspecting trusting people-thats not a prank, its a fucking crime.
like i sayd you wanna attack me, make a fucin thread.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:39 pm
by MKJ
how was that an attack? the man was asking a fair question.
talk about lack of reading comprehension
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:42 pm
by plained
look ffs
they dint lay down these charges cuz plained sayd ey you dig?
and its not a fair question , its a fucking stoopid question.
i have my opinion and thats that.
fuc people who trick poison people.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:07 pm
by R00k
You've never heard of people putting laxatives in people's food as a prank?
There are dosages on the bottle, but those dosages don't translate to making a tub full of brownies. Therefore, using too high a dosage could have completely been accidental.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:08 pm
by R00k
I wasn't attacking you FFS. There's no reason for a drumb-style meltdown here.
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:12 pm
by feedback
sounds like somebody got fed laxitive brownies!
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:13 pm
by Tsakali_
and had seconds
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:26 pm
by plained
nah i never had a laxitive in my life.
thanks for the lamma parade in my honer tho
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:30 pm
by plained
R00k wrote:You've never heard of people putting laxatives in people's food as a prank?
There are dosages on the bottle, but those dosages don't translate to making a tub full of brownies. Therefore, using too high a dosage could have completely been accidental.
i give you a tip.
stoopid idiots that that do this shit and think this is a "funny prank" need to be punished for thier crimes.
that way other stooppid lammas that think its funny will think twice and maybe not do the crime when they have to pay a price .
you guys know plaineds opinion dint make that law ey
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:33 pm
by plained
R00k wrote:I wasn't attacking you FFS. There's no reason for a drumb-style meltdown here.
typical "rook" style propaganda.
everytime someone cant read we should jus say,
its a rook flake-out
lols