Quake3World

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:57 pm**

yeah, if a bag of shit had wheels and some means of self-propulsion, and possessed cognitive faculties equal to the task of being even potentially reasoned with

doesn't seem likely, does it?

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:51 pm**

seremtan wrote:yeah, if a bag of shit had wheels and some means of self-propulsion, and possessed cognitive faculties equal to the task of being even potentially reasoned with

plained in a wheelchair going down a hill?

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:44 pm**

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:07 pm**

R00k wrote:She deserves to be raped by a giant, gay, deformed black man with an IQ of 80, and be forced to have the baby.

So cover yourself in shoe polish and get to work.

Posted: **Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:47 pm**

That was even more predictable than your gayc0k nick flames.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:10 pm**

You're right it sure is predictable that I'm going to CRUSH you.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:33 pm**

Apparently one of the Conference's award-winning poster boys - Corporal Matt Sanchez.... well, it turns out he used to be a gay porn star. You can see both Coulter and Michelle Malkin posing with him for a photo op below. Are they aware of it? Who knows.

http://rightsfield.com/2007/03/06/cpac- ... porn-star/

Now, if you’re like me, you might think, “Hmm, 36 years old and he’s a junior in college and only a corporal in the Marines?” Odd, but not totally implausible. But Sanchez’ face tinkled a few gay bells out there in fairyland, and last night I began to get emails letting me know that his rather late appearance on the Ivy League scene was because Sanchez has had a lengthy career in gay porn, working under the names Rod Majors (NSFW) and Pierre LaBranche, starring in such art films as Jawbreaker, Donkey Dick, and Glory Holes Of Fame 3, where his “11-inch uncut monster cock” earned him a devoted following.

Now, porn stars are entitled to enter the miliary, although Sanchez obviously had to do it on the downlow. Porn stars are entitled to have a right-wing ideology, even though the very people he supports would love to see gay porn stars strung up by the nuts. (Wait, have I seen that movie?) But, Oh.The.Irony. of Sanchez appearing with Bill O’Reilly who only a couple of days went apoplectic over San Francisco’s “Colt Studio Day.” And OH, the irony of Ann “Faggot” Coulter happily posing with Sanchez for a photo-op. The right-wing has gobbled this porn hunk up with a spoon, never knowing that tons of men have gobbled up his monster cock ON FILM. I love it, I love it, I love it.

You just can't even make up the kind of hypocritical stupidity that regularly manifests itself in the Republican ranks.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 5:37 pm**

LawL wrote:You're right it sure is predictable that I'm going to CRUSH you.

Oh no, you're GOING to? You can't think of a way to do it right now, so you're just using this opportunity to warn me that.... "One of these days -- I promise -- I'll do it!!" That's class.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:56 pm**

I don't see any teens in here, aside from the education level of your jokes.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:23 pm**

Really? Who in this thread is a teen?

As I suspected, you're just a moron. Probably been saving that picture up for a while now, eh?

Too bad it made you look like an idiot, instead of everyone else.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:06 pm**

R00k wrote:
LawL wrote:You're right it sure is predictable that I'm going to CRUSH you.
Oh no, you're GOING to? You can't think of a way to do it right now, so you're just using this opportunity to warn me that.... "One of these days -- I promise -- I'll do it!!" That's class.

Looks like S00k is too retarded to follow along.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:07 pm**

R00k wrote:Really? Who in this thread is a teen?

As I suspected, you're just a moron. Probably been saving that picture up for a while now, eh?

Too bad it made you look like an idiot, instead of everyone else.

Noone needs a pic to make a spastic like you look like an idiot.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:21 pm**

Then why did he post it, genius?

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:22 pm**

LawL wrote:
R00k wrote:
LawL wrote:You're right it sure is predictable that I'm going to CRUSH you.
Oh no, you're GOING to? You can't think of a way to do it right now, so you're just using this opportunity to warn me that.... "One of these days -- I promise -- I'll do it!!" That's class.
Looks like S00k is too retarded to follow along.

I'm still waiting for that CRUSHing you promised.

Posted: **Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:26 pm**

It bounced

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:05 am**

R00k wrote:Then why did he post it, genius?

Ask him you dumb cunt.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:06 am**

R00k wrote:
LawL wrote:
R00k wrote: Oh no, you're GOING to? You can't think of a way to do it right now, so you're just using this opportunity to warn me that.... "One of these days -- I promise -- I'll do it!!" That's class.
Looks like S00k is too retarded to follow along.
I'm still waiting for that CRUSHing you promised.

No need to wait seeing I'm already crushing you on a daily basis.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:10 am**

nay0k wrote:
R00k wrote:Really? Who in this thread is a teen?

As I suspected, you're just a moron. Probably been saving that picture up for a while now, eh?

Too bad it made you look like an idiot, instead of everyone else.
gee i dunno (i'm 16..), but maybe you shouldn't take pictures literally?

I'm sorry little kid, I didn't mean to hurt your feelings - I had no idea you were so young and sensitive.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:16 am**

LawL wrote:
R00k wrote:Then why did he post it, genius?
Ask him you dumb cunt.

Why would I do that? It was a rhetorical question - I guess that's PhD level stuff in the Outback school of law.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:18 am**

LawL wrote:
No need to wait seeing I'm already crushing you on a daily basis.

LawL wrote:no u

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 am**

As if we needed further confirmation that you don't know what you're talking about.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:23 am**

R00k wrote:
LawL wrote:
R00k wrote:Then why did he post it, genius?
Ask him you dumb cunt.
Why would I do that? It was a rhetorical question - I guess that's PhD level stuff in the Outback school of law.

Another failed comedy attempt from the queen of anti-comedy, S00k.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:25 am**

Maybe not little, but still a kid.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:26 am**

Hi Randy.

Posted: **Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:41 am**

LawL wrote:
R00k wrote:
LawL wrote: Ask him you dumb cunt.
Why would I do that? It was a rhetorical question - I guess that's PhD level stuff in the Outback school of law.
Another failed comedy attempt from the queen of anti-comedy, S00k.

Are you sure you're not a bot? You keep posting the same 3 sentences over and over again.

Quake3World

plained-like reasoning