biggest 911 smoking gun yet!

Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:26 pm

stupid?

Post by **scared?** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:03 pm

Pooinyourmouth wrote:

I don't think anyone here likes bush. It's pretty fucking stupid to assume that just because no one believes your tin hat conspiracy, they are somehow pro-bush.

sorry, most ppl believe 911 was an inside job. so you are on the wrong side of history. you sound foolish acting like your opinion is the prevailing one or whatever you are thinking in that little mind. or is what you meant is your world is quake3world so thats all that matters? rofl!

Post by **losCHUNK** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:11 pm

scared? wrote:
Pooinyourmouth wrote:

I don't think anyone here likes bush. It's pretty fucking stupid to assume that just because no one believes your tin hat conspiracy, they are somehow pro-bush.
sorry, most ppl believe 911 was an inside job.

wheres your stats on that ?

if so, you stupid americans letting that nasty man getting away with it

Post by **Nightshade** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:34 pm

scared? wrote:
Pooinyourmouth wrote:

I don't think anyone here likes bush. It's pretty fucking stupid to assume that just because no one believes your tin hat conspiracy, they are somehow pro-bush.
sorry, most ppl believe 911 was an inside job. so you are on the wrong side of history. you sound foolish acting like your opinion is the prevailing one or whatever you are thinking in that little mind. or is what you meant is your world is quake3world so thats all that matters? rofl!

You sound like a similar idiot we had here a while back. By the way, YOU are the one coming across like an arrogant dickhead, acting as if your opinion "is the prevailing one", moron.

Post by **MKJ** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:34 pm

rofl@themornans

Post by **Denz** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:33 pm

Most People? I don't think so. More like Some people. And the small population that truly believe that the government is out to get them wear tin foil hats.

Post by **seremtan** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:40 pm

9/11 was carried out by strip-club-frequenting, coke-snorting, pork and liquor-imbibing al-qa'eda nutjobs with mediocre piloting skills, all of whom were the beneficiaries of an almost unbelievable run of luck and an equally amazing collective lapse into incompetence spread over several years on the part of the CIA, FBI, US Customs, consulate officals, FAA, NORAD, Secret Service and the NSA

IT'S SO OBVIOUS!

Post by **hate** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:54 pm

sweet

fucking

madness

Post by **Denz** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:25 pm

seremtan wrote:9/11 was carried out by strip-club-frequenting, coke-snorting, pork and liquor-imbibing al-qa'eda nutjobs with mediocre piloting skills, all of whom were the beneficiaries of an almost unbelievable run of luck and an equally amazing collective lapse into incompetence spread over several years on the part of the CIA, FBI, US Customs, consulate officals, FAA, NORAD, Secret Service and the NSA

IT'S SO OBVIOUS!

Well when you put it like that, then........

Post by **Turbine** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:40 pm

Holly shit mate, aren't you afraid of people in black (bright orange blazers) suits paying you a visit?

Post by **4days** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:08 am

is this the one where the camera's pointed at the side of the building that hasn't started to cave in yet?

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:43 am

actually, WTC-7's collapse made no sense whatsoever

it's a case of which theory you think is more plausible: that it was 'pulled' or that a 47 storey building collapse from a couple of small fires like it was made of balsa wood

both sound equally incredible imho, and i've yet to hear any other explanation that doesn't

Post by **Foo** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:51 am

With WTC7 I always figured that if they did pull it, it would be because it contained some next-level CIA/NSA shit (They had some offices there after all) and it was part of their disaster plan. So I never read much into the WTC7 thing one way or another.

Post by **GONNAFISTYA** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:35 am

I blame Syria.

Post by **Pooinyourmouth** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:41 am

scared? wrote:
Pooinyourmouth wrote:

I don't think anyone here likes bush. It's pretty fucking stupid to assume that just because no one believes your tin hat conspiracy, they are somehow pro-bush.
sorry, most ppl believe 911 was an inside job. so you are on the wrong side of history. you sound foolish acting like your opinion is the prevailing one or whatever you are thinking in that little mind. or is what you meant is your world is quake3world so thats all that matters? rofl!

Fuck, no way someone is this retarded. Obviously a troll of some sorts. It's a small, yet very loud (and overly obnoxious/idiotic) few that like to wear that tin foil hat.

On the faint possibility that you might be real, my only advise is to get medicated... and fast yah fucking loony.

Post by **Nightshade** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:00 am

seremtan wrote:actually, WTC-7's collapse made no sense whatsoever

it's a case of which theory you think is more plausible: that it was 'pulled' or that a 47 storey building collapse from a couple of small fires like it was made of balsa wood

both sound equally incredible imho, and i've yet to hear any other explanation that doesn't

WTC7 is the one part of the whole mess that leaves me scratching my head. It certainly looks like it was pulled, but that brings up a whole shitpot full of questions, ones that will never be answered.

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:07 am

http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-W ... -06%20.pdf

fuck off geoff

Post by **HM-PuFFNSTuFF** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:19 am

seremtan wrote:mediocre piloting skills

IT'S SO OBVIOUS!

see this is exactly the problem. misinformation gets taken as fact. buddy's flight instructor said he thought that the dude could indeed have pulled off the flying necessary. the common misconception is that the instructor said the opposite

Post by **Nightshade** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:33 am

I must reiterate that it is incredibly easy to fly an airliner. Spend some time on MS Flight Simulator, you can learn all of the necessary systems to fly from A to B. FFS, the FAA has allowed pilots to log time spent one Flight Simulator as actual simulator time for years, it's that accurate.

Post by **GONNAFISTYA** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:37 am

I've seen footage of a 757 coming in low over the runway and then pulling up hard and banking right.

I was fucking amazed a plane that big could move that quick.

Post by **Nightshade** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:43 am

That's yet another thing that the herd doesn't understand. Airline pilots make the absolute gentlest maneuvers possible so they don't upset the slugs on the bus. The planes are capable of sooooo much more than they're ever put through during normal flight operations. That's why I laugh when people wig out over turbulence. You can deflect the wing of a 747 TWENTY SEVEN FEET before it will fail.

Tex Johnston blew people's minds during the roll-out flight of the 707 in Washington. There were a ton of airline reps and the like there to see it fly, and he barrel rolled the fucking thing over the crowd. The Boeing execs shit pickles over it and tried to rip him a new one when he landed. They asked him what the fuck he thought he was doing rolling the airplane like that.
His response?

"Selling airplanes."

Post by **AmIdYfReAk** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:06 am

and the funny part is, its true.

But def a good one liner.

Post by **quarn** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:17 am

omg i thought we had rules here. eat my rl

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:14 am

Nightshade wrote:
seremtan wrote:actually, WTC-7's collapse made no sense whatsoever

it's a case of which theory you think is more plausible: that it was 'pulled' or that a 47 storey building collapse from a couple of small fires like it was made of balsa wood

both sound equally incredible imho, and i've yet to hear any other explanation that doesn't
WTC7 is the one part of the whole mess that leaves me scratching my head. It certainly looks like it was pulled, but that brings up a whole shitpot full of questions, ones that will never be answered.

also, the WTC-7 collapse wasn't covered by the 9/11 commission report. it's like they knew something was up, but just didn't want to go there

incidentally, the 'impact + burning jet fuel' story about the towers was a supposition made by totally unqualified people, that more qualified people later tried to make into a viable explanation. no one ever did a proper investigation, on account of the rubble being immediately shipped off to china for recycling. way to preserve a crime scene, rudy

Post by **seremtan** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:18 am

HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:
seremtan wrote:mediocre piloting skills

IT'S SO OBVIOUS!
see this is exactly the problem. misinformation gets taken as fact. buddy's flight instructor said he thought that the dude could indeed have pulled off the flying necessary. the common misconception is that the instructor said the opposite

actually, all that thierry meyssan crap about hani hanjour being a shit pilot: who says he even piloted flight 77 anyway? where did that come from?

edit: and btw hanjour's flight school instructors DID say he was a mediocre pilot. that's not misconception, it's fact