Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:21 am
fuck the MP, what about the fucking game?
Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:05 am
Looks quite good, i'll be getting it i think
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Yeah, too bad the visual design (characters especially) is still bullshit. God I fucking hate Halo.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:20 pm
lol promodeskins
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:19 pm
looks gay.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:25 pm
I'll make up my mind after playing the beta...
Re: Halo 3 shots - FUCK.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:29 pm
o'dium wrote:I mean. FUCK. When did this game get a face lift...? I know I'm usually a graphics whore but... FUCK.
Its just... FUCK?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:49 pm
Indeed.
Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:44 pm
I think the shots look great and the game looks to be a lot of fun. I only have Halo for the Xbox, so I've never played the MP. I've heard all the good stuff about it and can't wait to try it.
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:09 am
sorry but thoose screenies look shit.. i mean compare that to gears of war ..its like looking at high res halo1 screen shots. what the hell where they working on all thoose years?!
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 1:09 am
o'dium is blown away by the screenshots but no one else is that impressed?
what is the world coming to?
FYI: i dont see what all the praise about the graphics is about either.
what is the world coming to?
FYI: i dont see what all the praise about the graphics is about either.
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 11:08 am
content?mac wrote:sorry but thoose screenies look shit.. i mean compare that to gears of war ..its like looking at high res halo1 screen shots. what the hell where they working on all thoose years?!
balancing?
gameplay perhaps?
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 11:18 am
Maybe because all the previous shots of Halo 3 have been Halo 2, but in higher res.Chupacabra wrote:o'dium is blown away by the screenshots but no one else is that impressed?
what is the world coming to?
FYI: i dont see what all the praise about the graphics is about either.
These shots show some serious texture work in some spaces, great use of colours. Compared to Gears its not as good, but Gears is usually tiny maps with 4 Vs 4. This is 16 player Quake style gameplay, fast and fun.
Graphics dont mean everything to a game, but these are Multiplayer graphics, these are the WORST it can look, and I think they have done a half decent job. Compare it to Crysis and it looks poor, compare it to everything else out atm and it looks great. Remember the specs of a 360, and what level of detail 99.9% of us will be running Crysis at, and THEN remember Halo 3 is a full 60FPS locked, and it looks GREAT.
Now we just need some decent SP screens. But at least Bungie listened, and it seems they listened well.
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 11:31 am
They look ok, nothing that special if you just look at them, BUt given the size of the maps and the level of detail it does look good.
Compare it to ET:QW and then you will have a good comparrison...
Compare it to ET:QW and then you will have a good comparrison...
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 8:04 am
more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 8:24 am
that first shot looks pretty good.
also. beta's this week right?
guess Live is gonna be hammered
also. beta's this week right?
guess Live is gonna be hammered
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:38 am
Yeah, UK time Wednesday, 1pm.MKJ wrote:that first shot looks pretty good.
also. beta's this week right?
guess Live is gonna be hammered
Live is gonna be fisted for the entire day, if not down. That many people all signing on doing one thing is going to cause some serious issues.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:58 am
Real vids are better than screensEraser wrote:more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/13/today ... a-footage/
:icon32:
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:28 am
wow, that looks ALOT better than those shit screens.Don Carlos wrote:Real vids are better than screensEraser wrote:more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/13/today ... a-footage/
:icon32:
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 12:44 pm
All you guys are hating because o'dium likes it
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:00 pm
looks like ut 2004 to meDon Carlos wrote:Real vids are better than screensEraser wrote:more shtos from the beta:
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=76317
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/05/13/today ... a-footage/
:icon32:
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:31 pm
I still feel Q3 had THE best MP of any FPS out there.
Halo is too slow, and doesn't have a good selection of weapons.
Halo is too slow, and doesn't have a good selection of weapons.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:42 pm
I agree 100%. Halo also allows for bullshit 1-shot kills to the head but if you hit anywhere else it takes like 100. Then there is the homing sword and the rocket launcher that blocks 75% of your view.Deathshroud wrote:I still feel Q3 had THE best MP of any FPS out there.
Halo is too slow, and doesn't have a good selection of weapons.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:54 pm
it does look nice.+JuggerNaut+ wrote:wow, that looks ALOT better than those shit screens.
that's the first bit of footage i've watched of an mp console game. don't think i'll ever be able to play one with a controller instead of kb/mouse. it just looks so spastic.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:22 pm
never got into Goldeneye64?4days wrote:it does look nice.+JuggerNaut+ wrote:wow, that looks ALOT better than those shit screens.
that's the first bit of footage i've watched of an mp console game. don't think i'll ever be able to play one with a controller instead of kb/mouse. it just looks so spastic.