Page 2 of 3

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:08 am
by bikkeldesnikkel
SOAPboy wrote:
ok, in that case, he could run Win98..

Ram is cheap.. and any laptop is gonna come with 256 now a days..



As far as somethign for ONLY movies and shit, a 500+mhz is fine for a cpu.. 128-256 ram is more than enough depending on os..

dont need anything special.. its just video.
well id say win98 is way too unstable and 2k is the best pick, but thats just my opinion.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:08 am
by bikkeldesnikkel
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
bikkeldesnikkel wrote:well i got win2k running on it with 128mb ram. I used to run it with 64mb and it still ran fine, so i think you can do fine with 128
sorry, no.
bikkeldesnikkel wrote:thats right, your post was pointless.
so was the time you spent registering here.
lame

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:46 am
by Kills On Site
Well of course we could ask ToxicBug what OS he plans on running. If most machines in his house are 2k then 2k be best for him, if most are XP then XP would be best for him; this is because 2k and XP usually don't play nice together when networked. Also he might perfer one over the other for any number of reasons. Hell I have a 300MHz laptop with 256MB of RAM and XP and it could watch movies, but you would be able to do nothing else while a movie was playing, not to mention that the LCD hinges are coming off and the ATI graphics card won't allow any form of alleceration; otherwise a good laptop considering that it was made in 1998 and still can do many functions

If you can muster the money for a new laptop I would recommend a WinBook. They have one starting at 699, altho to get one worth a damn 799 is needed

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:53 am
by bikkeldesnikkel
well i figured if he was considering a mobile dvd player, the better choice would be a laptop. no hassle with converting videos etc., n if you can get one for the same price, why not.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:05 pm
by Tormentius
bikkeldesnikkel wrote:well i figured if he was considering a mobile dvd player, the better choice would be a laptop. no hassle with converting videos etc., n if you can get one for the same price, why not.
Good point.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:41 pm
by Guest
I'm planning on using WinXP, the original question was "can I get a laptop that will play dvd/divx flawlessly for $400".

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:48 pm
by bikkeldesnikkel
ToxicBug wrote:I'm planning on using WinXP, the original question was "can I get a laptop that will play dvd/divx flawlessly for $400".
so ru getting a laptop or that dvd playa thingy?

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:55 pm
by Tormentius
ToxicBug wrote:I'm planning on using WinXP, the original question was "can I get a laptop that will play dvd/divx flawlessly for $400".
If you're planning on using XP the laptop would have to be purchased from the back of a van in order to give decent performance at that cost.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:56 pm
by Guest
So what do I need as min specs, 1ghz, 256mb + a 3d accel card?

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:10 pm
by Tormentius
ToxicBug wrote:So what do I need as min specs, 1ghz, 256mb + a 3d accel card?
256 at least. I'd strongly recommend 512.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:18 pm
by Guest
I bet a laptop with a 1ghz but a 512mb ram would be sort of rare :paranoid:

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:23 pm
by bikkeldesnikkel
256 is plenty if ur gonna play dvd/divx on it dont worry

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:26 pm
by 4g3nt_Smith
and 1 ghz is also overkill, though I doubt there are new notebooks with sub ghz CPUs.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:36 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
i got a P3 700 Laptop sitting here with 64megs of ram, its basically useless except for playing video's on, the first ~5 mins are reletivly choppy.. but then she smoothens out.. im sure with more ram she would poot.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:26 pm
by Guest
4g3nt_Smith wrote:and 1 ghz is also overkill, though I doubt there are new notebooks with sub ghz CPUs.
I specifically stated that I'm planning on getting a used laptop.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:33 pm
by 4g3nt_Smith
Well then, I know for a fact 700 mhz PIII and 256 megs of RAM will play a DVD fine, so thats a top level for what you need. Check ebay for cheap notebooks, but be aware that half the shit on there has fine print reading something is fucked and it doesn't actually work.

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 11:34 pm
by Kills On Site
Well I guess one could look at eBay Laptop Listings and you can specify RAM, HDD, CPU and brand. Of course the faster the better, also the newer the better; especially in laptops, they get more abuse then a PC and break faster.

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:20 am
by AmIdYfReAk
yea, and dont expect the batt to be any good..

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:33 am
by Kills On Site
AmIdYfReAk wrote:yea, and dont expect the batt to be any good..
Yes, I did forget that, older laptops not only had less effecient batteries, but also will die more quickly. I had two batteries with my 1998 laptop, both have been dead for quite a while

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:36 am
by Guest
The battery life isn't a problem for me, my home and my school luckily don't have a shortage of outlets :)

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:52 am
by +JuggerNaut+
bikkeldesnikkel wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:I'm planning on using WinXP, the original question was "can I get a laptop that will play dvd/divx flawlessly for $400".
so ru getting a laptop or that dvd playa thingy?
you're quite dense.

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:41 am
by Tormentius
+JuggerNaut+ wrote: you're quite dense.

Play nice with the n00bs :p

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:33 am
by bikkeldesnikkel
+JuggerNaut+ wrote:
bikkeldesnikkel wrote:
ToxicBug wrote:I'm planning on using WinXP, the original question was "can I get a laptop that will play dvd/divx flawlessly for $400".
so ru getting a laptop or that dvd playa thingy?
you're quite dense.
fuck off, it was just a question.

ps. i just noticed you haven't given any advice here... all you do is bitch :confused:

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:33 am
by bikkeldesnikkel
Tormentius wrote:
+JuggerNaut+ wrote: you're quite dense.

Play nice with the n00bs :p
i iz no a noob :icon27:

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 3:34 pm
by Tormentius
bikkeldesnikkel wrote:i iz no a noob :icon27:
:icon19: Then who did you post as before?