Quake3World

Mogul wrote:Injustice is injustice -- and I know Bush is a fagg0t. Still though, I wanted to contribute at least something to counter this ridiculous liberal cesspool that is q3w.

I am a liberal myself. But some of you are annoyingly LOUD-N-PROUD like some pencil-dick fag in a parade, only this time your hard-on is for Clinton or maybe Bush's corpse, instead of your boyfriend.

really, americans are idiots. you're getting fucked over time after time and still keep the apologetic stance. fucking pussies. i feel sorry for the few people that are actually trying to do something about it.

Mogul wrote:Injustice is injustice -- and I know Bush is a fagg0t. Still though, I wanted to contribute at least something to counter this ridiculous liberal cesspool that is q3w.

I am a liberal myself. But some of you are annoyingly LOUD-N-PROUD like some pencil-dick fag in a parade, only this time your hard-on is for Clinton or maybe Bush's corpse, instead of your boyfriend.

What the fuck are you talking about?

I'm trying to remember the last time I heard anybody here praising Clinton. I don't remember it at all.

You may see it as a bunch of people being "liberal gay clinton lovers" because they are calling a spade a spade, and you are simply bringing some balance.

But what is really happening in this thread, is that people are upset about the fact that the President of the US has just excused someone out of going to jail when they perjured themselves on a massive national security issue to try to hide the tracks of a person who outed a CIA agent. All this, after vowing that he desperately wanted to know who was behind this leak, and promised they would be punished.

This leak severely damaged our ability to track nuclear weapons on the black market and where they were being bought and sold. This isn't just some political issue, it's one of those rare, real issues of national security.

You know, a lot like Bin Laden was supposed to be. It turns out Bush lied about caring about him too, huh?

And what you are doing in this thread, is trying to take all this discussion, and say that it's simply a case of people having hard ons for Bill Clinton.

The fact that you really believe that says more about your political biases than anyone else's.

Not Clinton specifically -- liberal bias.

Mogul wrote:I wanted to contribute at least something to counter this ridiculous liberal cesspool that is q3w.

idiot.

Mogul wrote:Not Clinton specifically -- liberal bias.

Show me the liberal bias in disliking the fact that our national security was jeopardized by this administration and nobody was held accountable for it. Do only liberals care about national security?

You've got nothing.

Mogul wrote:this ridiculous liberal cesspool that is q3w

olol, funniest post this week

Mogul wrote:Not Clinton specifically -- liberal bias.

You believe everything Bill O'Reilly says, don't you?

bikkel -- I concede. I won't argue whether or not I am an idiot.

Rook -- q3w isn't full of liberal-biased threads pretty much every day? EDIT: Not to ignore your request. I hope national security of a concern for our citizens. But this board, in general, is heavily liberal-biased. And it comes out multiple times in multiple threads. And it pisses me off how "the other side" is practically never given a chance to be heard here.

Grudge -- same thing.

Nightshade -- I just SAID I was a liberal you cunt-tard.

This is exactly what I am talking about. One person gives a dissenting opinion against the majority on this board and I am the fucking town witch. That's OK. ^_^ Opinions are just that.

You didn't give a dissenting opinion. If you had, it would have been different.

You're just calling people names and making generalizations.

If you want to combat what you see as a liberal bias, why don't you do it by responding directly to threads with liberal bias in them, instead of attacking someone for saying something critical of Bush, and then justifying it by saying q3w is a liberal gay-loving cesspool?

saying you're a liberal in a post that is flagrant gay-bashing doesn't really lead anyone to take such a claim seriously.

and your's isn't a dissenting opinion, so much as a fucking moronic opinion. clinton did not do the same thing. that said, he got fucking thrashed in the press for it anyway.

edit: yea, you tell 'im rook

anyway, how bout that president? i hear he's got a nepotism fetish. unf unf!

What do you mean by "liberal-biased"?

Many things that conservatives claim to be "liberal" would be better off just called "non-retarded".

Mogul wrote: Nightshade -- I just SAID I was a liberal you cunt-tard.

Who the fuck cares? Label yourself whatever you want, you can still act dumb as a post and lead people to believe that you guzzle Bill's Kool-Aid.

Fuck this. 4v1.

EDIT: 5v1. Sorry Menkent, missed yours. I don't have the nerves or the time to defend myself in such an inter-riot. Funny how one post sets you cuntflaps off though.

ta-ta

To notice a certain direction, tendency in political viewpoints and labeling it is one thing, to base your own view on it is another.

What's the definition of a liberal?

Grudge wrote: Many things that conservatives claim to be "liberal" would be better off just called "non-retarded".

LOL

menkent wrote:anyway, how bout that president? i hear he's got a nepotism fetish. unf unf!

Seriously.

The whole crusade that was launched against Plame/Wilson to begin with, was supposed to be based on righteous indignation that the CIA would give such an important job to someone who was related to an agent.

Er..... Cheney family and Bush loyalists anyone? These guys have fucked our entire policy through cronyism and nepotism, and they still used it as justification for leaking the name of a covert agent -- and only then because their lies to the public were being revealed.

Seriously. All the hypocrisy, arrogance, disdain, etc. for this whole situation.... It makes such a horrid, bilious mixture that distilling it into even the most powerfully disgusting terms still weakens the overall sense of how wrong it is.

This commutation is not the issue, it's just the icing on the cake.

THE CAKE OF DOOM!!!!!


(sorry, guess i was getting a little dramatic there.....)

The only person to serve jail time in this whole thing is the fucking reporter who defended Libby's identity from the prosecutor. Not the guy who did the crime the prosecutor was investigating.

here are two interesting and contradictory reads:
1) http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... putations/

2) http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... lollipops/

tnf, that's totally fucked up

Grudge wrote:tnf, that's totally fucked up

Yea, it just sums up this whole administration's ability to deflect accountability well.

Grudge wrote:What do you mean by "liberal-biased"?

Many things that conservatives claim to be "liberal" would be better off just called "non-retarded".

I was going to say "correct" instead of "not-retarded" but I think yours captures the true flavor a bit better.

menkent wrote:http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/07/02/commutation-computations/

Wow, check out those comments... :icon14:

olbermann's class. i'd love to have heard him rip blair a new one. it's more than anyone over here has ever done, at least with that kind of eloquence