Echotrome. Video game innovation

Post by **Kracis** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:17 am

I'd wager it's not good.

Post by **DTS** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:19 am

Kracis wrote:I'd wager it's not good.

I guessed that much.

Post by **i think i am** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:42 am

like your head is so big it collapsed in on itself, like neutron stars do

Post by **DTS** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:58 am

i think i am wrote:like your head is so big it collapsed in on itself, like neutron stars do

I guessed he might be calling me big-headed, cause stars are big. But:
I just checked what you said, and Wikipidea says they are actually small dense stars, not big:

Wikipedia wrote:A typical neutron star has a mass between 1.35 to about 2.1 solar masses, with a corresponding radius between 20 and 10 km — 30,000 to 70,000 times smaller than the Sun. Thus, neutron stars have densities of 8×1013 to 2×1015 g/cm³, about the density of an atomic nucleus.

So actually he's saying I'm dense? I didn't post anything dense; strong opinion, not dense.
Perhaps he should point out what was wrong with what I posted. I guess he couldn't be bothered.

Resorting to insults just cause you disagree with someone is a bit lame.

Post by **andyman** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:00 am

did you even read the post you quoted?

Post by **andyman** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:01 am

DTS's reply:, yes but what does that have to do with anything huurrrrrR?????

Post by **DTS** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:12 am

andyman wrote:did you even read the post you quoted?

Yes. He was saying that neutron stars are big and collapse in on themselves, Wikipedia says they are small...

Ah, nevermind, I just read the Wikipedia page again and I realised I skipped over a bit before that said they are formed from collapsed massive stars. So he was right. (He was calling me big-headed.)

Edit: Actually he was wrong in a way, cause a neutron star is what's left after the collapse. It's not the neutron star that collapses.

Post by **DTS** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:17 am

riddla wrote:Dumb'n Totally Stupid strikes again, aka the new sucrak

I edited my message above. (You posted while I was editing it.)

Post by **andyman** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:18 am

DTS wrote:
riddla wrote:Dumb'n Totally Stupid strikes again, aka the new sucrak
I edited my message above. (You posted while I was editing it.)

that doesn't change anything

AND WHY DO YOU DERAIL EVERY FUCKING THREAD YOU POST IN.

Post by **DTS** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:29 am

andyman wrote:
DTS wrote:
riddla wrote:Dumb'n Totally Stupid strikes again, aka the new sucrak
I edited my message above. (You posted while I was editing it.)
that doesn't change anything

Yeah it does, cause I was reading it right in the first place. The only bit where he was right is that R00k was calling me big-headed.

Post by **andyman** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:31 am

And your head was SOOOOOO big, that it collapsed into an object that was comparable with a neutron star. DO YOU GET IT YET.

Post by **DTS** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:33 am

andyman wrote:AND WHY DO YOU DERAIL EVERY FUCKING THREAD YOU POST IN.

I don't.

There are people that do derail a lot of threads, but I'm not one of them.

It's just whenever people get in an arguement that can derail a thread. Actually it's always happened on Q3W, people would insult each other and the thread would get derailed and moved to R&R.

I was just trying to understand R00k's insult. You could say R00k derailed the thread by insulting.

Post by **DTS** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:35 am

andyman wrote:And your head was SOOOOOO big, that it collapsed into an object that was comparable with a neutron star. DO YOU GET IT YET.

Yeah, I thought I made it clear that I got it. Sorry I didn't make that clear enough for you...

Post by **andyman** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:39 am

DTS wrote:
andyman wrote:And your head was SOOOOOO big, that it collapsed into an object that was comparable with a neutron star. DO YOU GET IT YET.
Yeah, I thought I made it clear that I got it. Sorry I didn't make that clear enough for you...

no, you didn't, but back to the game.

Post by **R00k** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:15 am

DTS wrote:So actually he's saying I'm dense?

Why would I say something like that? Because you looked up the definition and STILL had to ask what it meant?

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:20 am

dont you just love people who want to argue everything even though they have a snowball's chance in hell they'll win?

admirable to say the least

Post by **Eraser** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:40 am

MKJ wrote:admirable to say the least

Er... don't confuse heroism with plain stupidity there.

Post by **Ryoki** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:17 am

A lot of times, it's the same thing.

Post by **Eraser** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:25 am

Depends on the outcome I guess

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:59 am

Eraser wrote:Depends on the outcome I guess

oh hey. vai tonite :icon32:

Post by **Eraser** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:06 am

MKJ wrote:
Eraser wrote:Depends on the outcome I guess
oh hey. vai tonite :icon32:

fuck yeah. You're going too right? My bro and dad (yes, the old man likes Mr Vai) are going as well.

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:19 am

why, thats potentially the same merry band as us

my dad couldnt make it (being in thailand n all. petty, hes a huge vai nut) but my bro will be there too.

im the ponytailed dude with 'DEMIA' written on his black shirt. so yea

Post by **Eraser** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:39 am

This morning, in some vague panick attack after the realization that I don't even have a Steve Vai t-shirt, I settled for a Joe Satriani t-shirt.

At this moment though, I'm wondering if that expresses the fact that not only do I like Steve Vai, I also know his old master, or that I am so utterly confused in the brain that I haven't got a clue whose concert I'm attending.

Post by **MKJ** » Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:49 am

my vai shirt is in the hamper :icon32:
would be a bit too groupieesque to show up in a sex n religion shirt that has been washed one too many times