Quake3World

best feature is the porn mode obviously...

re: EULA
http://tapthehive.com/discuss/This_Post ... EULA_Sucks

needs to be as extensible as firefox to win. i use like 4 or 5 extensions on a regular basis, and can't imagine not having them. (downthemall, flashblock, adblock, zotero, firebug on work boxes).

until that's there, it's just another platform to test against.

Just what we all need, another browser. I foresee frustrated web developers around the world committing suicide in the next week.

Therac-25 wrote:needs to be as extensible as firefox to win. i use like 4 or 5 extensions on a regular basis, and can't imagine not having them. (downthemall, flashblock, adblock, zotero, firebug on work boxes).

until that's there, it's just another platform to test against.

obsidian wrote:Just what we all need, another browser. I foresee frustrated web developers around the world committing suicide in the next week.

Not exactly. Chrome uses the same render that Safari and Konquero already use, WebKit.

Isn't the mozilla framework stuff called Chrome? What a mess.

No Seahawk skin. No Peenyuh use. FF2 my friend.

Too bad they own you with their EULA.

11. Content license from you
11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.

They backed down.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2329414,00.asp

I uninstalled it yesterday, before the change and gave the EULA as my reason.

what kind of moron reads the eula?...

who cares about a fucking browser...

ms will just fuck with it anyways...

works fantastically well for me so far.

so does i.e.

so why switch?

Why bother trying anything new?

if it ain't broke?

Works amazingly well, fast as fuck too, very impressed...

Too bad it looks ugly as shite and I couldn't show people I was using it...

Kinda like wearing HiTec trainers in school. I feel like I would get the shit kicked out of me if people saw it on my screen.

hate wrote:who cares about a fucking browser...

ms will just fuck with it anyways...

hate wrote:so does i.e.

so why switch?

hate wrote:if it ain't broke?

hate wrote:who cares about a fucking browser...

oh, you care.

Go to http://www.yahoo.com in any browser aside from Firefox

and

Doombrain wrote:

hate wrote:who cares about a fucking browser...

ms will just fuck with it anyways...

hate wrote:so does i.e.

so why switch?

hate wrote:if it ain't broke?

hate wrote:who cares about a fucking browser...

oh, you care.

your woman's intuition has failed you

again..

bitWISE wrote:Go to http://www.yahoo.com in any browser aside from Firefox

Firefox 3, IE 8 Beta, and Chrome all look alike.

^ no it doesn't
look @ the top

Owned.

Ryoki wrote:jesus christ

EDIT: Okay, this is interesting because the dutch version is actually rather different. This is the part that looks most like what you posted:

Google behoudt zich het recht voor (maar is niet verplicht) om sommige of alle Inhoud van een Service vooraf te controleren, te bekijken, te markeren, te filteren, te wijzigen, te weigeren of te verwijderen.

Which means that google has the right to check, look at, mark, filter, refuse or remove content. Seems far less drastical than your text, especially since later on there's a disclaimer:

Met uitzondering van de beperkte licentie die wordt beschreven in Artikel 11, erkent en stemt Google ermee in op grond van deze Voorwaarden geen rechten, aanspraken of belangen aangaande enige Inhoud van u (of uw licentiegevers) te verkrijgen die u door of via de Services verstrekt, publiceert, verstuurt of weergeeft, met inbegrip van eventuele intellectuele-eigendomsrechten die verbonden zijn aan die Inhoud (ongeacht of deze rechten al dan niet zijn geregistreerd en waar ter wereld deze rechten ook van kracht zijn).

Basically means they won't seek to own intellectual property of any data you send.

fyi the eula states that where there's a conflict of meaning between the english eula and translations of it, the english eula takes precedent

sorry dutchie