Call Of Duty: World At War

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
User avatar
Transient
Posts: 11357
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Transient »

seremtan wrote:the whole ww2 fps genre needs refreshing

we need games in the 2nd person
So... a game consisting entirely of cutscenes? SIGN ME UP!
[quote="YourGrandpa"]I'm satisfied with voicing my opinion and moving on.[/quote]
User avatar
seremtan
Posts: 36011
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by seremtan »

or we could skip the game part and use real people pretending to be characters in a story
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Captain »

Looking forward to Saving Private Ryan 2: Son of Ryan.
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by o'dium »

Transient wrote:
seremtan wrote:the whole ww2 fps genre needs refreshing

we need games in the 2nd person
So... a game consisting entirely of cutscenes? SIGN ME UP!
I already played it... It was called Metal Gear 4... :(
tnf
Posts: 13010
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by tnf »

Captain Mazda wrote:Shortest. Single player. Ever.
Buy or rent based on that?
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by o'dium »

Are you kidding? Its Mazda? His views on things are even worse than mine on this board...
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Captain »

tnf wrote:
Captain Mazda wrote:Shortest. Single player. Ever.
Buy or rent based on that?
Buy it if you liked CoD4 online. Otherwise it's a renter.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Doombrain »

creep wrote:coop single player, eh.
moron :olo:
YourGrandpa
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2000 7:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by YourGrandpa »

The PC version seems to be ok. Though I still need to spend some more time on it.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by scared? »

i liked cod4 sp better...
feedback
Posts: 7449
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by feedback »

Hey guys how about another WW2 FPS?
I love quake!
Plan B
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Plan B »

Played some sp at a friend's yesterday, and this really looks the business.
It's cod4+, in that they seem to have succesfully optimized an already great engine. Looks better and runs smoother.
Yeah, it's another ww2 shooter, but although that genre seems to have been pretty much milked to death, I don't really mind the setting that much. It's just classic cod shoot em up goodness.
I actually like using the older weaponry. Having something modern like a red dot is nice, but just using aiming down the sight without crosshairs, especially with single shot weapons, has a quality 'organic' feel to it.
I don't like how the developers apparently got complacent about sp duration, though.
They seem to think that since they got away with it with cod4, it doesn't really matter anyway, and that it's purely a prelude to the mp experience.
Maybe they're right, but still...
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by scared? »

only fucking no0bs use the red dot in cod4...
obsidian
Posts: 10970
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by obsidian »

Plan B wrote:great engine.
Of course, it's (somewhat) based off of the Quake 3 Engine.
[size=85][url=http://gtkradiant.com]GtkRadiant[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com]Q3Map2[/url] | [url=http://q3map2.robotrenegade.com/docs/shader_manual/]Shader Manual[/url][/size]
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by scared? »

/cg_fuckyou...
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by scared? »

btw... why doesn't cg_drawfps 1, 2 or 3 not showing up on my shit? whats the story?...
User avatar
MKJ
Posts: 32581
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by MKJ »

drawfps was disabled in the beta...
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by scared? »

and the full version too?...
Massive Quasars
Posts: 8696
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Massive Quasars »

We're out of good wars to develop games around. Could use new material, maybe get some great adventure conservatives on this.
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Tsakali »

how about looking into the past for some good material? are guns that crucial in fps? can't they use more primitive weapons and create good gameplay that actually requires skill? different swords, bows and knives...maybe bring to life some theoretical advanced weapons they were developing back in those days.

you want vehicles? throw in there some horses, elephants, even carriages....

all these things can all have diff. strength, speed and effectiveness...in the same way diff. props and weapons balance out gameplay in a modern day fps.
User avatar
Captain
Posts: 20410
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:50 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Captain »

Unfortunately all the good developers are too scared to try something new and cool :down:
o'dium
Posts: 11712
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by o'dium »

Are guns important in a first person shooter...?

I think so, yes.
scared?
Posts: 20988
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by scared? »

Tsakali wrote:how about looking into the past for some good material? are guns that crucial in fps? can't they use more primitive weapons and create good gameplay that actually requires skill? different swords, bows and knives...maybe bring to life some theoretical advanced weapons they were developing back in those days.

you want vehicles? throw in there some horses, elephants, even carriages....

all these things can all have diff. strength, speed and effectiveness...in the same way diff. props and weapons balance out gameplay in a modern day fps.
u must be joking...or ur a fucking joke...

btw...tanks r gay as shit in this game...and the more i play it the more i wanna go back to cod4...
Tsakali
Posts: 7175
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2000 8:00 am

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by Tsakali »

are you crying about the obvious f.p.s. pun ? if not elaborate...unless you're a moron
andyman
Posts: 11198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:20 pm

Re: Call Of Duty: World At War

Post by andyman »

Tsakali wrote:how about looking into the past for some good material? are guns that crucial in fps? can't they use more primitive weapons and create good gameplay that actually requires skill? different swords, bows and knives...maybe bring to life some theoretical advanced weapons they were developing back in those days.

you want vehicles? throw in there some horses, elephants, even carriages....

all these things can all have diff. strength, speed and effectiveness...in the same way diff. props and weapons balance out gameplay in a modern day fps.
how about just making shit up? does it really have to be based on anything at all?
Post Reply