top gear

Open discussion about any topic, as long as you abide by the rules of course!
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Doombrain »

that would be where the top of his head was removed by the earth hitting him at 200mph.
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Dr_Watson »

i thought it was 300mph.... anyway his hair people should publish a book on how to fluff all your hair to the front and make it look natural. because they do a fucking excellent job at reducing forehead.
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Doombrain »

more like 980mph by the time the story made it to hollywood.
4days
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2002 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by 4days »

that review of the fiesta was brilliant
Doombrain
Posts: 23227
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2000 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Doombrain »

Very informative.
werldhed
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by werldhed »

That Veritas is WAY more embarrassing than the Caterham. Recently they seem to be talking out of their asses (more than usual).
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Dr_Watson »

the veritas looked completely fucking ridiculous. i've seen good looking can-am style cars and that was not one. It looked like some sort of jaguar prototype with the top hacked off.
SoM
Posts: 8489
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 1999 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by SoM »

Don Carlos wrote:
Eraser wrote:James May gets scared when he goes faster than 30mph.
I saw him get emotional doing 253mph in the Veyron

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=da0YhGoyT9w

Nice work :)
that gave me a hardon
[color=red][WYD][/color]S[color=red]o[/color]M
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Eraser »

DTS wrote:
Eraser wrote:I know, I know. The Veyron and Pagani Zonda thing was brilliant. The review starts brilliantly with the following quote:
"I don't want to find some look-at-me two door Italian supercar with a 250mph speedo and a 250 thousand pound pricetag or any of that sort of rubbish. I want to drive something more like... well to be honest, so... some... oh cock..."

Here it is at YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BK9W4Kng04
That video is a mirror image of the actual video, which I didn't realise until I'd watched it and read the comments. I thought the title meant mirrorred as in file mirrored. Trust you to post a shit version. Thanks a lot cunt.
What has crawled up your ass?
User avatar
Eraser
Posts: 19177
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Eraser »

werldhed wrote:That Veritas is WAY more embarrassing than the Caterham. Recently they seem to be talking out of their asses (more than usual).
Was thinking the same thing when I saw it. To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Dr_Watson wrote:is hamster hiding some hairline problems with his usual floppy hairdo?

that *IS* a little high, but i would need a picture of someone going 100MPH in an open cockpit car with no windshield for comparison...
User avatar
Κracus
Posts: 5972
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:38 am

Re: top gear

Post by Κracus »

I saw their attempt to destroy that toyota 4x4 which was fucking amazing.
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by losCHUNK »

anyone see from the new series where clarkson plows a truck through a brick wall ?

i was pissing myself, the stupid cunt
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Clarkson has TONS of DVD's out now that he dose stupid shit like that... and i love each and everyone of them. :)
losCHUNK
Posts: 16019
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by losCHUNK »

aye seen them too, think the funniest was shooting clay pidgeons, only with a car and a bazooka instead of a clay plate and gun :up:

edit - http://www.snotr.com/video/1287
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Dr_Watson »

AmIdYfReAk wrote:
Dr_Watson wrote:is hamster hiding some hairline problems with his usual floppy hairdo?

that *IS* a little high, but i would need a picture of someone going 100MPH in an open cockpit car with no windshield for comparison...
i'm just busting his gleaming chops.
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by DTS »

Eraser wrote:To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.
I agree.
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

i'd hit it...

in fact, I've wanted one for a LONG time now... getting on 9 years.

i would still take the engineless/tranmissionless Kit... :)
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Don Carlos »

The Honda on yesterdays show was quite amazing. That is the future and the sooner they get it into production the better
Grandpa Stu
Posts: 2362
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Grandpa Stu »

yeah that honda was way cool albeit a bit old news. speaking of old news; they just now got the tesla on their track?
Don Carlos
Posts: 17509
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Don Carlos »

Yeah I know - A bit late to be fair. But I was really shocked at just how quick it was. Also if they planned things properly they could distribute the batteries around the car in the possitions of the engine and gear box etc to sort the balance out. why do people not thing of these things? :/
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Grandpa Stu wrote:yeah that honda was way cool albeit a bit old news. speaking of old news; they just now got the tesla on their track?
a question that has been asked before, and the response was the needed to GET one... :)
DTS
Posts: 2879
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 7:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by DTS »

DTS wrote:
Eraser wrote:To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.
I agree.
Having said that, when you're used to looking at modern aerodynamically designed sports and racing cars, it does look a bit stupid.
Dr_Watson
Posts: 5237
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by Dr_Watson »

its similar to the cool wall philosophy.
if you pulled up to the house of a hot professional lady to take her on a date... would she get in it; or just sneer?
AmIdYfReAk
Posts: 6926
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am

Re: top gear

Post by AmIdYfReAk »

Well, that is the kind of car that you would not do such a thing..

That would be a Race/summer/track/cruiser for me, nothing more.. i would have my standard car For the rest of the Stuffs :)
Post Reply