top gear
Re: top gear
that would be where the top of his head was removed by the earth hitting him at 200mph.
Re: top gear
i thought it was 300mph.... anyway his hair people should publish a book on how to fluff all your hair to the front and make it look natural. because they do a fucking excellent job at reducing forehead.
Re: top gear
more like 980mph by the time the story made it to hollywood.
Re: top gear
that review of the fiesta was brilliant
Re: top gear
That Veritas is WAY more embarrassing than the Caterham. Recently they seem to be talking out of their asses (more than usual).
Re: top gear
the veritas looked completely fucking ridiculous. i've seen good looking can-am style cars and that was not one. It looked like some sort of jaguar prototype with the top hacked off.
Re: top gear
that gave me a hardonDon Carlos wrote:I saw him get emotional doing 253mph in the VeyronEraser wrote:James May gets scared when he goes faster than 30mph.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=da0YhGoyT9w
Nice work
[color=red][WYD][/color]S[color=red]o[/color]M
Re: top gear
What has crawled up your ass?DTS wrote:That video is a mirror image of the actual video, which I didn't realise until I'd watched it and read the comments. I thought the title meant mirrorred as in file mirrored. Trust you to post a shit version. Thanks a lot cunt.Eraser wrote:I know, I know. The Veyron and Pagani Zonda thing was brilliant. The review starts brilliantly with the following quote:
"I don't want to find some look-at-me two door Italian supercar with a 250mph speedo and a 250 thousand pound pricetag or any of that sort of rubbish. I want to drive something more like... well to be honest, so... some... oh cock..."
Here it is at YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BK9W4Kng04
Re: top gear
Was thinking the same thing when I saw it. To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.werldhed wrote:That Veritas is WAY more embarrassing than the Caterham. Recently they seem to be talking out of their asses (more than usual).
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
Re: top gear
Dr_Watson wrote:is hamster hiding some hairline problems with his usual floppy hairdo?
that *IS* a little high, but i would need a picture of someone going 100MPH in an open cockpit car with no windshield for comparison...
Re: top gear
I saw their attempt to destroy that toyota 4x4 which was fucking amazing.
Re: top gear
anyone see from the new series where clarkson plows a truck through a brick wall ?
i was pissing myself, the stupid cunt
i was pissing myself, the stupid cunt
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
Re: top gear
Clarkson has TONS of DVD's out now that he dose stupid shit like that... and i love each and everyone of them. 

Re: top gear
aye seen them too, think the funniest was shooting clay pidgeons, only with a car and a bazooka instead of a clay plate and gun 
edit - http://www.snotr.com/video/1287

edit - http://www.snotr.com/video/1287
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Re: top gear
i'm just busting his gleaming chops.AmIdYfReAk wrote:Dr_Watson wrote:is hamster hiding some hairline problems with his usual floppy hairdo?
that *IS* a little high, but i would need a picture of someone going 100MPH in an open cockpit car with no windshield for comparison...
Re: top gear
I agree.Eraser wrote:To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
Re: top gear
i'd hit it...
in fact, I've wanted one for a LONG time now... getting on 9 years.
i would still take the engineless/tranmissionless Kit...
in fact, I've wanted one for a LONG time now... getting on 9 years.
i would still take the engineless/tranmissionless Kit...

-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: top gear
The Honda on yesterdays show was quite amazing. That is the future and the sooner they get it into production the better
-
- Posts: 2362
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: top gear
yeah that honda was way cool albeit a bit old news. speaking of old news; they just now got the tesla on their track?
-
- Posts: 17509
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Re: top gear
Yeah I know - A bit late to be fair. But I was really shocked at just how quick it was. Also if they planned things properly they could distribute the batteries around the car in the possitions of the engine and gear box etc to sort the balance out. why do people not thing of these things? :/
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
Re: top gear
a question that has been asked before, and the response was the needed to GET one...Grandpa Stu wrote:yeah that honda was way cool albeit a bit old news. speaking of old news; they just now got the tesla on their track?

Re: top gear
Having said that, when you're used to looking at modern aerodynamically designed sports and racing cars, it does look a bit stupid.DTS wrote:I agree.Eraser wrote:To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.
Re: top gear
its similar to the cool wall philosophy.
if you pulled up to the house of a hot professional lady to take her on a date... would she get in it; or just sneer?
if you pulled up to the house of a hot professional lady to take her on a date... would she get in it; or just sneer?
-
- Posts: 6926
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2000 8:00 am
Re: top gear
Well, that is the kind of car that you would not do such a thing..
That would be a Race/summer/track/cruiser for me, nothing more.. i would have my standard car For the rest of the Stuffs
That would be a Race/summer/track/cruiser for me, nothing more.. i would have my standard car For the rest of the Stuffs
