Page 2 of 3

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:27 pm
by Doombrain
that would be where the top of his head was removed by the earth hitting him at 200mph.

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:32 pm
by Dr_Watson
i thought it was 300mph.... anyway his hair people should publish a book on how to fluff all your hair to the front and make it look natural. because they do a fucking excellent job at reducing forehead.

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:58 pm
by Doombrain
more like 980mph by the time the story made it to hollywood.

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:16 pm
by 4days
that review of the fiesta was brilliant

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:26 pm
by Doombrain
Very informative.

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 9:23 pm
by werldhed
That Veritas is WAY more embarrassing than the Caterham. Recently they seem to be talking out of their asses (more than usual).

Re: top gear

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:39 am
by Dr_Watson
the veritas looked completely fucking ridiculous. i've seen good looking can-am style cars and that was not one. It looked like some sort of jaguar prototype with the top hacked off.

Re: top gear

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:57 am
by SoM
Don Carlos wrote:
Eraser wrote:James May gets scared when he goes faster than 30mph.
I saw him get emotional doing 253mph in the Veyron

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=da0YhGoyT9w

Nice work :)
that gave me a hardon

Re: top gear

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:23 am
by Eraser
DTS wrote:
Eraser wrote:I know, I know. The Veyron and Pagani Zonda thing was brilliant. The review starts brilliantly with the following quote:
"I don't want to find some look-at-me two door Italian supercar with a 250mph speedo and a 250 thousand pound pricetag or any of that sort of rubbish. I want to drive something more like... well to be honest, so... some... oh cock..."

Here it is at YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BK9W4Kng04
That video is a mirror image of the actual video, which I didn't realise until I'd watched it and read the comments. I thought the title meant mirrorred as in file mirrored. Trust you to post a shit version. Thanks a lot cunt.
What has crawled up your ass?

Re: top gear

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:24 am
by Eraser
werldhed wrote:That Veritas is WAY more embarrassing than the Caterham. Recently they seem to be talking out of their asses (more than usual).
Was thinking the same thing when I saw it. To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.

Re: top gear

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 10:14 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
Dr_Watson wrote:is hamster hiding some hairline problems with his usual floppy hairdo?

that *IS* a little high, but i would need a picture of someone going 100MPH in an open cockpit car with no windshield for comparison...

Re: top gear

Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:20 pm
by Κracus
I saw their attempt to destroy that toyota 4x4 which was fucking amazing.

Re: top gear

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:08 am
by losCHUNK
anyone see from the new series where clarkson plows a truck through a brick wall ?

i was pissing myself, the stupid cunt

Re: top gear

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:48 am
by AmIdYfReAk
Clarkson has TONS of DVD's out now that he dose stupid shit like that... and i love each and everyone of them. :)

Re: top gear

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:04 am
by losCHUNK
aye seen them too, think the funniest was shooting clay pidgeons, only with a car and a bazooka instead of a clay plate and gun :up:

edit - http://www.snotr.com/video/1287

Re: top gear

Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:52 am
by Dr_Watson
AmIdYfReAk wrote:
Dr_Watson wrote:is hamster hiding some hairline problems with his usual floppy hairdo?

that *IS* a little high, but i would need a picture of someone going 100MPH in an open cockpit car with no windshield for comparison...
i'm just busting his gleaming chops.

Re: top gear

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 4:02 am
by DTS
Eraser wrote:To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.
I agree.

Re: top gear

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:01 am
by AmIdYfReAk
i'd hit it...

in fact, I've wanted one for a LONG time now... getting on 9 years.

i would still take the engineless/tranmissionless Kit... :)

Re: top gear

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:15 am
by Don Carlos
The Honda on yesterdays show was quite amazing. That is the future and the sooner they get it into production the better

Re: top gear

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:28 am
by Grandpa Stu
yeah that honda was way cool albeit a bit old news. speaking of old news; they just now got the tesla on their track?

Re: top gear

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:48 am
by Don Carlos
Yeah I know - A bit late to be fair. But I was really shocked at just how quick it was. Also if they planned things properly they could distribute the batteries around the car in the possitions of the engine and gear box etc to sort the balance out. why do people not thing of these things? :/

Re: top gear

Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 4:25 pm
by AmIdYfReAk
Grandpa Stu wrote:yeah that honda was way cool albeit a bit old news. speaking of old news; they just now got the tesla on their track?
a question that has been asked before, and the response was the needed to GET one... :)

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:50 am
by DTS
DTS wrote:
Eraser wrote:To be honest, I don't see what's so emberrassing about the Caterham. Looks like a 60's kind of sportscar to me.
I agree.
Having said that, when you're used to looking at modern aerodynamically designed sports and racing cars, it does look a bit stupid.

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:33 am
by Dr_Watson
its similar to the cool wall philosophy.
if you pulled up to the house of a hot professional lady to take her on a date... would she get in it; or just sneer?

Re: top gear

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:49 am
by AmIdYfReAk
Well, that is the kind of car that you would not do such a thing..

That would be a Race/summer/track/cruiser for me, nothing more.. i would have my standard car For the rest of the Stuffs :)