how dumb r the brits?...
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
During Vietnam War, the United States suffered 58,119 killed, 153,303 wounded, and 1,948 missing in action. Casualty figures for the Republic of Vietnam are estimated at 230,000 killed and 1,169,763 wounded. Combined the North Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong suffered approximately 1,100,000 killed in action and an unknown number of wounded. It is estimated that between 2 to 4 million Vietnamese civilians were killed during the conflict.
And you still lost.
And you still lost.
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
You mean these guys?...Doombrain wrote:Run! The small yellow man half my weight is coming
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS36d9-VlM8
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
okay...and germany kicked ur asses in ww1 and ww2 yet u still won...but only becuz of us...lol?...Doombrain wrote:During Vietnam War, the United States suffered 58,119 killed, 153,303 wounded, and 1,948 missing in action. Casualty figures for the Republic of Vietnam are estimated at 230,000 killed and 1,169,763 wounded. Combined the North Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong suffered approximately 1,100,000 killed in action and an unknown number of wounded. It is estimated that between 2 to 4 million Vietnamese civilians were killed during the conflict.
And you still lost.
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
scared? wrote:
if it would have been u and the germans...without all the help...lol u guys would have been annihilated...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Britain
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
"us"? You mean a bunch of old aids infested anorexics won the war? I don't think so Twiggy.scared? wrote:okay...and germany kicked ur asses in ww1 and ww2 yet u still won...but only becuz of us...lol?...Doombrain wrote:During Vietnam War, the United States suffered 58,119 killed, 153,303 wounded, and 1,948 missing in action. Casualty figures for the Republic of Vietnam are estimated at 230,000 killed and 1,169,763 wounded. Combined the North Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong suffered approximately 1,100,000 killed in action and an unknown number of wounded. It is estimated that between 2 to 4 million Vietnamese civilians were killed during the conflict.
And you still lost.

Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
lol ur still upset about being smaller than me?...how cute...
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
lol you're still mad I'm twice your size. Expected.
Thick, solid and tight in all the right places.
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
If they'd thrown one more egg at you guys, you woulda folded like a pair of feedbacks pants. You had nuthin left after that. Brit diplomats begging Washington DC fer help. "Jerry's coming for you Yanks next." Yeah. Whatever.DRuM wrote:scared? wrote:
if it would have been u and the germans...without all the help...lol u guys would have been annihilated...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Britain

[color=#00FF00][b]"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?" Asked of a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.[/b][/color]
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
Eat a fat one, roo-bait.
[color=#00FF00][b]"How do you keep the natives off the booze long enough to pass the test?" Asked of a Scottish driving instructor in 1995.[/b][/color]
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
roo-bait? ffs that's just sad
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
US losses
1) Vietnam
2) Iraq (2003)?
1) Vietnam
2) Iraq (2003)?
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
Sorry, but geoof is correct.HM-PuFFNSTuFF wrote:yeah rightscared? wrote:we won every battle in vietnam...
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
yes...vietnam...iraq...we win every battle...but lose the war...
the brits on the other hand...can't win a battle unless they get help from a friend...
jesus...argentina almost kicked their asses...lol...
the brits on the other hand...can't win a battle unless they get help from a friend...
jesus...argentina almost kicked their asses...lol...
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
lol, just, no you fucking didn'tNightshade wrote:
Sorry, but geoof is correct.

Re: how dumb r the brits?...
brilliantDoombrain wrote:That's why the navy were pushing anything heavy off the ships to gain more speed

[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
we kicked their ass in their own backyard with a few boats, fucking ownedscared? wrote:yes...vietnam...iraq...we win every battle...but lose the war...
the brits on the other hand...can't win a battle unless they get help from a friend...
jesus...argentina almost kicked their asses...lol...
didnt the brits bail you out in korea n all ?
Last edited by losCHUNK on Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
[color=red] . : [/color][size=85] You knows you knows [/size]
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
*sigh* I know, I KNOW! But it's only about the winning battles thing. He's also partially correct in that they did push shit off carriers to make more room. Don't know about any other reasons.Doombrain wrote:lol, just, no you fucking didn'tNightshade wrote:
Sorry, but geoof is correct.
And yes, we got our asses kicked by the little yellow devils from a strategic point of view.
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
no...
germany owned the fuck out of the brits....
lol the germans even had to scuttle the bismark u morons couldn't sink with everything u had...
germany owned the fuck out of the brits....
lol the germans even had to scuttle the bismark u morons couldn't sink with everything u had...
-
- Posts: 17020
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:00 am
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
losCHUNK wrote:
didnt the brits bail you out in korea n all ?
uhh...no. Not to my knowledge.
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
The 'Bismarck' was sunk after an attack from the Royal Navy, you hick tard 

Re: how dumb r the brits?...
lol the germans scuttled it when u morons couldn't sink it...try harder idiot...
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedi ... p-Bismarck
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedi ... p-Bismarck
The American expedition's final conclusions were strikingly different from the findings of the Anglo-American team estimated that Bismarck could still float for at least a day when the British vessels ceased fire and could have been captured by the Royal Navy, a position supported by the historian Ludovic Kennedy[42]. Ballard found the hull sound, adding: "we found a hull that appears whole and relatively undamaged by the descent and impact."[43] They concluded the direct cause of sinking was due to scuttling: sabotage of engine-room valves by her crew, as claimed by German survivors.
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:56 pm
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
this is gay
Re: how dumb r the brits?...
She capsized and sank, with the loss of all but 110 of her crew of some 2300 men.
History vs. Geoff
History vs. Geoff
